UPDATED: 04-04-26 09:07 PDT

boys Kings 1
  
Kings                 
W-L: ( 3- 1) PR = 92.9498

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 313 A Anderson ( 2- 3, 88.8) 11- 8 320 H Milford ( 3- 0, 98.8) 8-15 324 H Bishop Fenwick ( 3- 2, 87.4) 10- 5 326 A Lakota West ( 2- 2, 89.0) 10- 4 410 A La Salle ( 4- 1, 87.2) 413 A Oak Hills ( 4- 2, 88.1) 415 H Little Miami ( 4- 0, 96.5) 417 H Elder Cincinnati ( 3- 1, 90.1) 420 A Sycamore ( 0- 4, 84.3) 422 H Wyoming ( 0- 0, 87.3) 424 A Springboro ( 1- 2, 89.0) 429 A Lebanon ( 1- 3, 86.1) 505 H Loveland ( 4- 0, 96.8) 506 A Walnut Hills ( 0- 0, 87.3) 511 H Lakota East ( 2- 3, 86.6) 513 H Turpin ( 4- 1, 85.7)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   313 A Anderson               11- 8       3     3          -0.17
   320 H Milford                 8-15      -7    -5          -0.19
   324 H Bishop Fenwick         10- 5       5     7           0.00
   326 A Lakota West            10- 4       6     3    +      2.04

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   326 A Lakota West            10- 4       6     3    +      2.04

Kings Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Anderson Kings Kings  
Anthony Wayne Kings   Kings
Archbishop Alter Kings   Kings
Archbishop Hoban Kings   Kings
Archbishop McNichola Kings insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Kings
Archbishop Moeller Archbishop Moeller   Archbishop Moeller
Aurora Kings   Kings
Avon Kings   Kings
Avon Lake Kings   Kings
Bay Kings   Kings
Beavercreek Kings   Kings
Bellbrook Kings tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Kings
Benedictine Clevela Kings   Kings
Bexley Kings   Kings
Big Walnut Kings   Kings
Bishop Fenwick Kings Kings  
Bishop Watterson Bishop Watterson   Bishop Watterson
Boardman Kings   Kings
Bowling Green Kings   Kings
Brecksville-Broadvie Kings   Kings
Brunswick Kings   Kings
Buckeye Valley Kings   Kings
Canal Winchester Kings   Kings
Canfield Kings   Kings
Canton Central Catho Kings   Kings
Cardinal Mooney Kings   Kings
Carroll Kings   Kings
Centerville Kings   Kings
Chagrin Falls Chagrin Falls   Chagrin Falls
Chaminade Julienne Kings insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Kings
Chardon Kings   Kings
Cincinnati Hills Chr Kings   Kings
Clay Kings   Kings
Cleveland Heights Kings   Kings
Clinton-Massie Kings   Kings
Columbus Academy Kings   Kings
Copley Kings   Kings
Cuyahoga Valley Chri Kings   Kings
Delaware Hayes Delaware Hayes   Delaware Hayes
Dublin Coffman Dublin Coffman   Dublin Coffman
Dublin Jerome Dublin Jerome   Dublin Jerome
Dublin Scioto Kings   Kings
Edgewood Kings   Kings
Elder Cincinnati Kings   Kings
Elyria Catholic Kings   Kings
Fairfield Kings   Kings
Fairmont Kettering Kings Kings   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Findlay Kings   Kings
Franklin Kings   Kings
Gilmour Academy Kings   Kings
GlenOak-Canton Kings   Kings
Granville Kings   Kings
Green Kings   Kings
Grove City Kings   Kings
Hawken School Kings   Kings
Highland Kings   Kings
Hilliard Bradley Kings   Kings
Hilliard Darby Kings   Kings
Hilliard Davidson Kings   Kings
Holy Name Kings   Kings
Hoover North Canton Kings   Kings
Hudson Hudson   Hudson
Hudson Blue Kings   Kings
Indian Hill Kings   Kings
Jackson Massillon Kings   Kings
John Glenn Kings   Kings
Johnstown Kings   Kings
Jonathan Alder Kings   Kings
Kenston Kings   Kings
Kent Roosevelt Kings   Kings
Keystone Kings   Kings
Kirtland Kings   Kings
La Salle Kings   Kings
Lake Uniontown Kings   Kings
Lakewood Kings   Kings
Lakota East Kings   Kings
Lakota West Kings Kings  
Lebanon Kings insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Kings
Licking Valley Kings   Kings
Lima Kings   Kings
Lincoln Gahanna Kings   Kings
Little Miami Little Miami   Little Miami
Louisville Kings   Kings
Loveland Loveland tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Loveland
Madeira Kings   Kings
Mariemont Kings   Kings
Marysville Kings   Kings
Mason Kings   Kings
Medina Medina   Medina
Mentor Mentor   Mentor
Miamisburg Kings insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Kings
Milford Milford Milford  
Monroe Kings   Kings
New Albany New Albany   New Albany
Newark Kings   Kings
North Ridgeville Kings   Kings
Northmont Kings   Kings
Notre Dame-Cathedral Kings   Kings
Oak Hills Kings insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Kings
Oakwood Kings   Kings
Olentangy Berlin Kings   Kings
Olentangy HS Kings   Kings
Olentangy Liberty Olentangy Liberty   Olentangy Liberty
Olentangy Orange Kings   Kings
Olmsted Falls Kings   Kings
Orange Kings   Kings
Ottawa Hills Kings   Kings
Padua Franciscan Kings   Kings
Perrysburg Kings   Kings
Pickerington Central Kings   Kings
Pickerington North Kings   Kings
Poland Seminary Kings   Kings
Revere Kings   Kings
Riverside Painesvill Kings   Kings
Rocky River Rocky River   Rocky River
Seven Hills Kings   Kings
Shaker Heights Kings   Kings
Solon Kings   Kings
Southeast Ravenna Kings   Kings
Springboro Kings tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Kings
St Charles Prep Kings   Kings
St Edward St Edward   St Edward
St Francis De Sales Kings   Kings
St Francis DeSales - Kings   Kings
St Ignatius Cle Blu Kings   Kings
St Ignatius Clevelan St Ignatius Clevelan   St Ignatius Clevelan
St Johns Jesuit Kings   Kings
St Vincent-St Mary Kings   Kings
St Xavier Cincinnat St Xavier Cincinnat   St Xavier Cincinnat
Stow-Munroe Falls Kings   Kings
Strongsville Kings   Kings
Summit CDS Kings   Kings
Sycamore Kings   Kings
Sylvania Northview Kings   Kings
Sylvania Southview Kings   Kings
Thomas Worthington Kings   Kings
Tipp City Kings   Kings
Toledo United Kings   Kings
Turpin Kings   Kings
University School Cl Kings   Kings
Upper Arlington Upper Arlington   Upper Arlington
Wadsworth Wadsworth   Wadsworth
Walnut Hills Kings   Kings
Walsh Jesuit Kings   Kings
Waynesville Kings   Kings
West Geauga Kings   Kings
Western Reserve B Kings   Kings
Westerville Central Kings   Kings
Westerville North Kings   Kings
Westerville South Kings   Kings
Westlake Kings   Kings
Willoughby South Kings   Kings
Wilmington Kings   Kings
Winton Woods Kings   Kings
Wooster Kings   Kings
Worthington Kilbourn Worthington Kilbourn   Worthington Kilbourn
Wyoming Kings   Kings
Xenia Kings   Kings

PowerWise = 137


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 3.45

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Anderson        ( 2- 3, 88.8)    11- 8      -11.12      16.79       1.00         0.86            15.33
   0 H Milford         ( 3- 0, 98.8)     8-15       -1.14      26.77      -1.00         0.86            -1.84
   0 H Bishop Fenwick  ( 3- 2, 87.4)    10- 5      -12.49      15.42      -1.00         0.86            12.43
   0 A Lakota West     ( 2- 2, 89.0)    10- 4      -10.91      17.00       1.00         0.86            15.51
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        41.42

winning pts = 43.2657 losing points = -1.8423

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------