UPDATED: 04-23-26 10:35 PDT

boys Kennett 1
  
Kennett               
W-L: ( 2- 1) PR = 90.2407

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 415 H Gilford ( 2- 2, 91.2) 5- 6 416 H Trinity Manchester ( 1- 3, 89.4) 5- 4 417 A Stevens ( 0- 3, 81.2) 15- 5 424 A Laconia ( 3- 2, 92.2) 504 H Milford ( 1- 3, 85.9) 506 A Coe-Brown ( 5- 0, 98.7) 508 A Trinity Manchester ( 1- 3, 89.4) 511 H Pelham ( 2- 2, 90.0) 513 H Bishop Brady ( 1- 2, 89.5) 515 A Kearsarge ( 1- 4, 85.8) 518 H Lebanon ( 1- 1, 93.8) 520 H Hopkinton ( 2- 2, 91.1) 525 A Plymouth Regional ( 4- 1, 95.8) 527 H John Stark ( 1- 3, 90.4)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   415 H Gilford                 5- 6      -1    -1          -0.13
   416 H Trinity Manchester      5- 4       1     1           0.07
   417 A Stevens                15- 5      10     9           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Kennett PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alvirne Kennett   Kennett
Bedford Bedford   Bedford
Bishop Brady Kennett   Kennett
Bishop Guertin Bishop Guertin   Bishop Guertin
Bow Bow tied -  1- 0 Bow
Campbell Campbell   Campbell
Coe-Brown Coe-Brown   Coe-Brown
Concord Kennett   Kennett
ConVal ConVal ConVal   2- 0 vs 1- 1
Derryfield Derryfield   Derryfield
Dover Dover   Dover
Exeter HS Exeter HS   Exeter HS
Gilford Gilford Gilford  
Goffstown Kennett   Kennett
Hanover Hanover   Hanover
Hollis-Brookline Kennett   Kennett
Hopkinton Hopkinton   Hopkinton
Inter-Lakes-Moultonb Inter-Lakes-Moultonb   Inter-Lakes-Moultonb
John Stark John Stark tied -  1- 1 John Stark
Kearsarge Kennett tied -  1- 0 Kennett
Keene-Monadnock Kennett   Kennett
Kingswood Kingswood   Kingswood
Laconia Laconia   Laconia
Lebanon Lebanon   Lebanon
Londonderry Londonderry   Londonderry
Manchester Memorial- Kennett   Kennett
Merrimack Merrimack   Merrimack
Merrimack Valley Kennett   Kennett
Milford Kennett   Kennett
Nashua North Kennett   Kennett
Nashua South Nashua South   Nashua South
Oyster River-Newmark Oyster River-Newmark   Oyster River-Newmark
Pelham Kennett Kennett   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Pembroke Academy Kennett   Kennett
Pinkerton Academy Pinkerton Academy   Pinkerton Academy
Plymouth Regional Plymouth Regional Plymouth Regional   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Portsmouth Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Salem Kennett   Kennett
Souhegan Souhegan   Souhegan
Spaulding Kennett   Kennett
St Thomas Aquinas Kennett   Kennett
Stevens Kennett Kennett  
Timberlane Timberlane   Timberlane
Trinity Manchester Kennett Kennett  
Windham Windham   Windham
Winnacunnet Winnacunnet   Winnacunnet

PairWisePlus = 18


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 3.83

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Gilford         ( 2- 2, 91.2)     5- 6       -8.75       9.98      -0.04         1.28           -11.22
   0 H Trinity Manche  ( 1- 3, 89.4)     5- 4      -10.54       8.19      -0.04         1.28            10.39
   0 A Stevens         ( 0- 3, 81.2)    15- 5      -18.73       1.00       0.04         1.28             1.33
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                         0.50

winning pts = 11.7260 losing points = -11.2248

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------