John Stark
W-L: ( 3- 7) PR = 83.3178
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
413 H Stevens ( 0- 7, 78.7) 21- 1
415 A Laconia ( 3- 7, 84.7) 5- 6
417 A Gilford ( 3- 6, 83.6) 4- 5
422 H Bow ( 8- 1, 88.2) 6-10
424 H ConVal ( 5- 4, 86.1) 6- 9
504 H Kearsarge ( 3- 8, 83.1) 5- 8
506 H Hopkinton ( 6- 3, 85.6) 10-14
508 A Lebanon ( 6- 1, 87.8) 12-13
511 A Milford ( 1- 9, 80.8) 7- 4
513 A Manchester Memorial- ( 1- 8, 82.3) 6- 5
515 H Campbell ( 4- 6, 84.9)
520 A Bishop Brady ( 4- 3, 84.4)
522 A Coe-Brown (10- 0, 91.1)
526 H Pelham ( 6- 4, 85.5)
527 A Kennett ( 5- 3, 85.9)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
413 H Stevens 21- 1 20 5 0.02
415 A Laconia 5- 6 -1 -2 0.79
417 A Gilford 4- 5 -1 -1 -0.36
422 H Bow 6-10 -4 -5 0.53
424 H ConVal 6- 9 -3 -2 -0.63
504 H Kearsarge 5- 8 -3 1 - -3.57
506 H Hopkinton 10-14 -4 -2 - -2.15
508 A Lebanon 12-13 -1 -5 + 3.91
511 A Milford 7- 4 3 2 0.89
513 A Manchester Memorial- 6- 5 1 1 0.37
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
504 H Kearsarge 5- 8 -3 1 - -3.57
506 H Hopkinton 10-14 -4 -2 - -2.15
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
508 A Lebanon 12-13 -1 -5 + 3.91
|
John Stark PairWisePlus Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
| Alvirne |
John Stark |
|
John Stark   1- 0 vs 0- 1 |
|
| Bedford |
Bedford |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Bedford |
| Bishop Brady |
Bishop Brady |
|
Bishop Brady   3- 2 vs 1- 4 |
|
| Bishop Guertin |
Bishop Guertin |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Bishop Guertin |
| Bow |
Bow |
Bow |
 
| |
| Campbell |
Campbell |
|
Campbell   3- 3 vs 0- 6 |
|
| Coe-Brown |
Coe-Brown |
|
Coe-Brown   6- 0 vs 2- 4 |
|
| Concord |
Concord |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Concord |
| ConVal |
ConVal |
ConVal |
 
| |
| Derryfield |
Derryfield |
|
 
| Derryfield |
| Dover |
Dover |
|
 
| Dover |
| Exeter HS |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Gilford |
Gilford |
Gilford |
 
| |
| Goffstown |
Goffstown |
|
 
| Goffstown |
| Hanover |
Hanover |
|
 
| Hanover |
| Hollis-Brookline |
Hollis-Brookline |
|
 
| Hollis-Brookline |
| Hopkinton |
Hopkinton |
Hopkinton |
 
| |
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb |
Inter-Lakes-Moultonb |
|
 
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb |
| Kearsarge |
Kearsarge |
Kearsarge |
 
| |
| Keene-Monadnock |
Keene-Monadnock |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Keene-Monadnock |
| Kennett |
Kennett |
|
Kennett   3- 1 vs 2- 2 |
|
| Kingswood |
Kingswood |
|
 
| Kingswood |
| Laconia |
Laconia |
Laconia |
 
| |
| Lebanon |
Lebanon |
Lebanon |
 
| |
| Londonderry |
Londonderry |
|
 
| Londonderry |
| Manchester Memorial- |
John Stark |
John Stark |
 
| |
| Merrimack |
Merrimack |
|
 
| Merrimack |
| Merrimack Valley |
John Stark |
|
 
| John Stark |
| Milford |
John Stark |
John Stark |
 
| |
| Nashua North |
Nashua North |
|
 
| Nashua North |
| Nashua South |
Nashua South |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Nashua South |
| Oyster River-Newmark |
Oyster River-Newmark |
|
 
| Oyster River-Newmark |
| Pelham |
Pelham |
|
Pelham   4- 1 vs 1- 4 |
|
| Pembroke Academy |
John Stark |
|
 
| John Stark |
| Pinkerton Academy |
Pinkerton Academy |
|
 
| Pinkerton Academy |
| Plymouth Regional |
Plymouth Regional |
|
Plymouth Regional   6- 1 vs 2- 5 |
|
| Portsmouth |
Portsmouth |
|
 
| Portsmouth |
| Salem |
John Stark |
|
John Stark   1- 0 vs 0- 1 |
|
| Souhegan |
Souhegan |
|
 
| Souhegan |
| Spaulding |
John Stark |
|
 
| John Stark |
| St Thomas Aquinas |
St Thomas Aquinas |
|
 
| St Thomas Aquinas |
| Stevens |
John Stark |
John Stark |
 
| |
| Timberlane |
Timberlane |
|
 
| Timberlane |
| Trinity Manchester |
Trinity Manchester |
|
tied -  1- 2 |
Trinity Manchester |
| Windham |
Windham |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Windham |
| Winnacunnet |
Winnacunnet |
|
 
| Winnacunnet |
PairWisePlus = 8

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 9.36
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Stevens ( 0- 7, 78.7) 21- 1 -21.16 3.23 -0.40 0.94 2.66
0 A Laconia ( 3- 7, 84.7) 5- 6 -15.19 9.20 0.40 0.94 -13.85
0 A Gilford ( 3- 6, 83.6) 4- 5 -16.34 8.06 0.40 0.94 -14.93
0 H Bow ( 8- 1, 88.2) 6-10 -11.65 12.74 -0.40 0.94 -11.28
0 H ConVal ( 5- 4, 86.1) 6- 9 -13.82 10.58 -0.40 0.94 -13.30
0 H Kearsarge ( 3- 8, 83.1) 5- 8 -16.76 7.64 -0.40 0.94 -16.06
0 H Hopkinton ( 6- 3, 85.6) 10-14 -14.34 10.06 -0.40 0.94 -13.79
0 A Lebanon ( 6- 1, 87.8) 12-13 -12.07 12.33 0.40 0.94 -10.93
0 A Milford ( 1- 9, 80.8) 7- 4 -19.09 5.31 0.40 0.94 5.34
0 A Manchester Mem ( 1- 8, 82.3) 6- 5 -17.61 6.79 0.40 0.94 6.72
------
-79.42
|
winning pts = 14.7179 losing points = -94.1368
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------