UPDATED: 04-28-26 08:46 PDT

boys Hudson 1
  
Hudson                
W-L: ( 4- 2) PR = 96.5326

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 331 H Superior ( 0- 1, 88.0) 19- 0 410 A Madison ( 6- 1, 96.6) 10-12 411 A Verona ( 5- 3, 94.8) 10- 8 418 H Middleton ( 7- 1, 98.1) 10-11 424 A Kimberly ( 4- 3, 89.8) 15- 5 425 A Neenah ( 3- 2, 92.7) 15- 9

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   331 H Superior               19- 0      19     9           0.00
   410 A Madison                10-12      -2     0          -1.94
   411 A Verona                 10- 8       2     2           0.29
   418 H Middleton              10-11      -1    -2           0.55
   424 A Kimberly               15- 5      10     7           0.00
   425 A Neenah                 15- 9       6     4           1.21

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Hudson PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Appleton Hudson   Hudson
Arrowhead Hudson   Hudson
Bay Port Hudson Hudson   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Brookfield Hudson   Hudson
Catholic Memorial Hudson   Hudson
Cedarburg Hudson   Hudson
De Pere Hudson Hudson   2- 0 vs 0- 2
DeForest Hudson   Hudson
Elkhorn Hudson   Hudson
Franklin Hudson   Hudson
Hamilton Hudson   Hudson
Homestead Hudson Hudson   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Janesville Hudson Hudson   1- 2 vs 0- 3
Kenosha Hudson   Hudson
Kettle Moraine Kettle Moraine   Kettle Moraine
Kimberly Hudson Hudson  
La Crosse Hudson Hudson   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Madison Madison Madison  
Marquette University Hudson tied -  1- 2 Hudson
Middleton Middleton Middleton  
Mukwonago Hudson Hudson   1- 1 vs 0- 2
Muskego Hudson   Hudson
Neenah Hudson Hudson  
Notre Dame Green Ba Hudson   Hudson
Oak Creek Hudson   Hudson
Oconomowoc Hudson   Hudson
Oneida Nation Hudson   Hudson
Oregon Hudson Hudson   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Pulaski Hudson Hudson   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Sauk Prairie Hudson Hudson   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Sun Prairie Hudson tied -  0- 1 Hudson
Superior Hudson Hudson  
University Milwauke Hudson   Hudson
Verona Hudson Hudson  
Waukesha Hudson   Hudson
Waunakee Waunakee Waunakee   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Wausau Hudson Hudson   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Wauwatosa Hudson   Hudson
West Bend Hudson   Hudson
Whitefish Bay Hudson   Hudson

PairWisePlus = 36


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 6.00

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Superior        ( 0- 1, 88.0)    19- 0      -11.91      13.11      -0.01         1.00            13.10
   0 A Madison         ( 6- 1, 96.6)    10-12       -3.32      21.71       0.01         1.00            -3.31
   0 A Verona          ( 5- 3, 94.8)    10- 8       -5.09      19.94       0.01         1.00            19.95
   0 H Middleton       ( 7- 1, 98.1)    10-11       -1.81      23.22      -0.01         1.00            -1.82
   0 A Kimberly        ( 4- 3, 89.8)    15- 5      -10.12      14.91       0.01         1.00            14.92
   0 A Neenah          ( 3- 2, 92.7)    15- 9       -7.17      17.86       0.01         1.00            17.87
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        60.72

winning pts = 65.8489 losing points = -5.1320

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------