Reno
W-L: ( 4- 4) PR = 80.6247Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 228 H Damonte Ranch ( 1- 5, 76.1) 16- 0 302 A Reed ( 1- 8, 75.5) 11- 2 305 A McQueen ( 1- 5, 79.4) 10- 8 309 A Douglas ( 5- 4, 84.6) 4-15 312 A Galena ( 4- 4, 87.8) 0-15 319 H Spanish Springs ( 8- 3, 92.2) 2-24 321 H Reed ( 1- 8, 75.5) 8- 1 406 H Douglas ( 5- 4, 84.6) 4-13 414 A Damonte Ranch ( 1- 5, 76.1) 420 H Bishop Manogue ( 5- 0, 95.5) 426 H Truckee/North Tahoe ( 4- 2, 90.9) 430 A McQueen ( 1- 5, 79.4)
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
228 H Damonte Ranch 16- 0 16 5 0.11
302 A Reed 11- 2 9 5 0.24
305 A McQueen 10- 8 2 1 1.17
309 A Douglas 4-15 -11 -4 -0.56
312 A Galena 0-15 -15 -8 0.00
319 H Spanish Springs 2-24 -22 -11 0.00
321 H Reed 8- 1 7 6 0.00
406 H Douglas 4-13 -9 -4 -1.39
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bishop Gorman | |
| Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Centennial | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Clark County | Clark County | Clark County | ||
| Coronado | Coronado | Coronado | ||
| Damonte Ranch | Reno | Reno | ||
| Douglas | Douglas | Douglas | ||
| Faith Lutheran | Faith Lutheran | Faith Lutheran | ||
| Foothill Hendersonvi | Foothill Hendersonvi | Foothill Hendersonvi | ||
| Galena | Galena | Galena | ||
| McQueen | Reno | Reno | ||
| Palo Verde | Palo Verde | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Palo Verde | |
| Reed | Reno | Reno | ||
| Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | ||
| Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe 4- 1 vs 2- 3 |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Damonte Ranch ( 1- 5, 76.1) 16- 0 -23.75 1.00 -0.41 0.72 0.42
0 A Reed ( 1- 8, 75.5) 11- 2 -24.45 1.00 0.41 0.72 1.02
0 A McQueen ( 1- 5, 79.4) 10- 8 -20.52 3.93 0.41 0.72 3.12
0 A Douglas ( 5- 4, 84.6) 4-15 -15.25 9.20 0.41 0.72 -10.67
0 A Galena ( 4- 4, 87.8) 0-15 -12.10 12.35 0.41 0.72 -8.40
0 H Spanish Spring ( 8- 3, 92.2) 2-24 -7.67 16.78 -0.41 0.72 -5.81
0 H Reed ( 1- 8, 75.5) 8- 1 -24.45 1.00 -0.41 0.72 0.42
0 H Douglas ( 5- 4, 84.6) 4-13 -15.25 9.20 -0.41 0.72 -11.26
------
-31.16
|