Galena
W-L: ( 4- 4) PR = 87.7966Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 226 H Reed ( 1- 8, 75.5) 17- 0 304 A Douglas ( 5- 4, 84.6) 13- 7 310 H Truckee/North Tahoe ( 4- 2, 90.9) 9-18 312 H Reno ( 4- 4, 80.6) 15- 0 317 H Spanish Springs ( 8- 3, 92.2) 10-13 408 H Spanish Springs ( 8- 3, 92.2) 4-17 409 H Bishop Manogue ( 5- 0, 95.5) 6-12 412 A McQueen ( 1- 5, 79.4) 14- 3 417 A Bishop Manogue ( 5- 0, 95.5) 428 A Truckee/North Tahoe ( 4- 2, 90.9) 501 H Damonte Ranch ( 1- 5, 76.1)
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
226 H Reed 17- 0 17 13 0.00
304 A Douglas 13- 7 6 3 + 2.26
310 H Truckee/North Tahoe 9-18 -9 -3 - -2.31
312 H Reno 15- 0 15 8 0.00
317 H Spanish Springs 10-13 -3 -4 1.02
408 H Spanish Springs 4-17 -13 -4 -0.98
409 H Bishop Manogue 6-12 -6 -7 0.00
412 A McQueen 14- 3 11 8 0.00
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 310 H Truckee/North Tahoe 9-18 -9 -3 - -2.31 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 304 A Douglas 13- 7 6 3 + 2.26 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bishop Gorman | |
| Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | ||
| Centennial | Centennial | Centennial | ||
| Clark County | Galena | Galena | ||
| Coronado | Coronado | Coronado | ||
| Damonte Ranch | Galena | Galena 3- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Douglas | Galena | Galena | ||
| Faith Lutheran | Faith Lutheran | Faith Lutheran | ||
| Foothill Hendersonvi | Galena | Galena | ||
| McQueen | Galena | Galena | ||
| Palo Verde | Palo Verde | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Palo Verde | |
| Reed | Galena | Galena | ||
| Reno | Galena | Galena | ||
| Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | Spanish Springs | ||
| Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe | Truckee/North Tahoe |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Reed ( 1- 8, 75.5) 17- 0 -24.45 1.00 -0.41 0.72 0.42
0 A Douglas ( 5- 4, 84.6) 13- 7 -15.25 9.20 0.41 0.72 6.91
0 H Truckee/North ( 4- 2, 90.9) 9-18 -9.00 15.45 -0.41 0.72 -6.77
0 H Reno ( 4- 4, 80.6) 15- 0 -19.28 5.17 -0.41 0.72 3.42
0 H Spanish Spring ( 8- 3, 92.2) 10-13 -7.67 16.78 -0.41 0.72 -5.81
0 H Spanish Spring ( 8- 3, 92.2) 4-17 -7.67 16.78 -0.41 0.72 -5.81
0 H Bishop Manogue ( 5- 0, 95.5) 6-12 -4.37 20.08 -0.41 0.72 -3.44
0 A McQueen ( 1- 5, 79.4) 14- 3 -20.52 3.93 0.41 0.72 3.12
------
-7.95
|