Exeter HS
W-L: ( 3- 0) PR = 98.5547
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
413 H Windham ( 3- 1, 93.7) 18- 4
417 A Concord ( 2- 3, 89.9) 17- 4
420 H Salem ( 0- 4, 82.9) 16- 3
427 A Nashua North ( 1- 3, 87.4)
429 H Bedford ( 3- 0, 98.5)
501 H Portsmouth ( 5- 0, 97.4)
504 H Pinkerton Academy ( 4- 0, 99.9)
506 A Merrimack ( 3- 1, 95.0)
508 A Dover ( 3- 2, 94.9)
511 H Londonderry ( 1- 3, 92.0)
515 A Keene-Monadnock ( 1- 2, 84.4)
518 A Bishop Guertin ( 2- 0, 96.8)
520 A Nashua South ( 2- 3, 93.7)
526 A Bedford ( 3- 0, 98.5)
527 H Bishop Guertin ( 2- 0, 96.8)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
413 H Windham 18- 4 14 5 0.10
417 A Concord 17- 4 13 9 0.00
420 H Salem 16- 3 13 16 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
|
Exeter HS PairWisePlus Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
| Alvirne |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Bedford |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Bishop Brady |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Bishop Guertin |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Bow |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Campbell |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Coe-Brown |
Coe-Brown |
|
 
| Coe-Brown |
| Concord |
Exeter HS |
Exeter HS |
 
| |
| ConVal |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Derryfield |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Dover |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Gilford |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Goffstown |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Hanover |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Hollis-Brookline |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Hopkinton |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| John Stark |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Kearsarge |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Keene-Monadnock |
Exeter HS |
|
Exeter HS   2- 0 vs 1- 1 |
|
| Kennett |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Kingswood |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Laconia |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Lebanon |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Londonderry |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Manchester Memorial- |
Exeter HS |
|
Exeter HS   1- 0 vs 0- 1 |
|
| Merrimack |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Merrimack Valley |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Milford |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Nashua North |
Exeter HS |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Exeter HS |
| Nashua South |
Exeter HS |
|
Exeter HS   1- 0 vs 0- 1 |
|
| Oyster River-Newmark |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Pelham |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Pembroke Academy |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Pinkerton Academy |
Pinkerton Academy |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Pinkerton Academy |
| Plymouth Regional |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Portsmouth |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Salem |
Exeter HS |
Exeter HS |
 
| |
| Souhegan |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Spaulding |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| St Thomas Aquinas |
Exeter HS |
|
Exeter HS   1- 0 vs 0- 1 |
|
| Stevens |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Timberlane |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Trinity Manchester |
Exeter HS |
|
 
| Exeter HS |
| Windham |
Exeter HS |
Exeter HS |
 
| |
| Winnacunnet |
Exeter HS |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Exeter HS |
PairWisePlus = 44

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 3.83
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Windham ( 3- 1, 93.7) 18- 4 -6.20 12.53 -0.04 1.28 15.94
0 A Concord ( 2- 3, 89.9) 17- 4 -10.03 8.70 0.04 1.28 11.16
0 H Salem ( 0- 4, 82.9) 16- 3 -17.03 1.70 -0.04 1.28 2.11
------
29.22
|
winning pts = 29.2159 losing points = 0.0000
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------