UPDATED: 04-04-26 09:08 PDT

boys Davis 1
  
Davis                 
W-L: ( 5- 3) PR = 88.1151

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 304 H Logan ( 0- 4, 72.5) 20- 0 310 A Woods Cross ( 1- 8, 83.9) 9- 7 313 H Cedar Valley ( 0- 8, 82.0) 13- 2 317 A Riverton ( 6- 3, 90.1) 9-11 320 H Park City ( 7- 0, 99.9) 3-16 323 A Highland ( 3- 5, 84.4) 16- 3 325 A Viewmont ( 4- 5, 81.6) 16- 4 327 H Bingham ( 6- 2, 90.6) 8-10 407 H Syracuse ( 6- 2, 85.3) 409 A Layton ( 1- 5, 77.4) 410 A Bountiful ( 7- 1, 93.0) 414 H Farmington ( 5- 1, 96.3) 417 A Weber ( 6- 2, 91.1) 421 A Alta ( 6- 1, 95.5) 423 A Syracuse ( 6- 2, 85.3) 428 H Layton ( 1- 5, 77.4) 430 A Farmington ( 5- 1, 96.3) 505 H Weber ( 6- 2, 91.1)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   304 H Logan                  20- 0      20    16           0.00
   310 A Woods Cross             9- 7       2     4          -1.95
   313 H Cedar Valley           13- 2      11     6           0.00
   317 A Riverton                9-11      -2    -2           0.20
   320 H Park City               3-16     -13   -12           0.00
   323 A Highland               16- 3      13     3           1.58
   325 A Viewmont               16- 4      12     6           0.00
   327 H Bingham                 8-10      -2    -2           0.23

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Davis Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alta Alta insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Alta
American Fork Davis tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Davis
Bear River Bear River tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bear River
Bingham Bingham Bingham  
Bonneville Davis   Davis
Bountiful Bountiful insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Bountiful
Box Elder Box Elder   Box Elder
Brighton Brighton tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Brighton
Canyon View Davis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Davis
Cedar Davis insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Davis
Cedar Valley Davis Davis  
Clearfield Davis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Davis
Copper Hills Davis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Davis
Corner Canyon Corner Canyon tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Corner Canyon
Crimson Cliffs Davis   Davis
Desert Hills Davis   Davis
Dixie Davis tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Davis
East East tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) East
Farmington Farmington tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Farmington
Fremont Davis   Davis
Green Canyon Davis tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Davis
Herriman Herriman   Herriman
Highland Davis Davis  
Hillcrest Davis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Davis
Hurricane Davis   Davis
Jordan Davis   Davis
Juan Diego Catholic Juan Diego Catholic tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Juan Diego Catholic
Judge Memorial Catho Judge Memorial Catho insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Judge Memorial Catho
Layton Davis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Davis
Lehi Davis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Davis
Logan Davis Davis  
Lone Peak Davis tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Davis
Maple Mountain Davis tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Davis
Mountain Crest Davis   Davis
Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge   Mountain Ridge
Mountain View Davis   Davis
Northridge Davis   Davis
Olympus Olympus   Olympus
Orem Davis   Davis
Park City Park City Park City  
Payson Payson tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Payson
Pine View Davis   Davis
Pleasant Grove Pleasant Grove tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Pleasant Grove
Provo Davis tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Davis
Ridgeline Ridgeline   Ridgeline
Riverton Riverton Riverton  
Roy Davis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Davis
Salem Hills Davis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Davis
Sky View Sky View   Sky View
Skyline Davis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Davis
Skyridge Skyridge insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Skyridge
Snow Canyon Davis   Davis
Spanish Fork Davis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Davis
Springville Davis tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Davis
Syracuse Davis   Davis
Timpanogos Davis   Davis
Timpview Timpview tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Timpview
Viewmont Davis Davis  
Wasatch Wasatch insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Wasatch
Waterford Waterford   Waterford
Weber Weber tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Weber
West Davis   Davis
West Field West Field   West Field
West Jordan Davis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Davis
Westlake Westlake   Westlake
Woods Cross Davis Davis  

PowerWise = 39


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.36

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Logan           ( 0- 4, 72.5)    20- 0      -27.38       1.00      -0.26         1.04             0.77
   0 A Woods Cross     ( 1- 8, 83.9)     9- 7      -16.00      11.38       0.26         1.04            12.17
   0 H Cedar Valley    ( 0- 8, 82.0)    13- 2      -17.89       9.49      -0.26         1.04             9.64
   0 A Riverton        ( 6- 3, 90.1)     9-11       -9.84      17.54       0.26         1.04           -10.01
   0 H Park City       ( 7- 0, 99.9)     3-16       -0.00      27.38      -0.26         1.04            -0.27
   0 A Highland        ( 3- 5, 84.4)    16- 3      -15.46      11.92       0.26         1.04            12.73
   0 A Viewmont        ( 4- 5, 81.6)    16- 4      -18.33       9.05       0.26         1.04             9.73
   0 H Bingham         ( 6- 2, 90.6)     8-10       -9.29      18.09      -0.26         1.04            -9.99
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        24.76

winning pts = 45.0336 losing points = -20.2690

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------