UPDATED: 03-03-26 16:15 PDT

boys Coppell 1
  
Coppell               
W-L: ( 2- 1) PR = 83.7192

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 213 H Flower Mound ( 1- 3, 83.1) 8- 9 221 H Cumberland Academy ( 0- 4, 75.5) 18- 1 228 A Fort Worth CDS ( 1- 1, 80.2) 13- 7 307 A Bridge LC ( 2- 1, 83.8) 313 A John Paul II ( 3- 3, 80.9) 327 A Parish Episcopal ( 1- 2, 78.5) 403 H Guyer ( 1- 2, 79.7) 407 H Trinity Valley ( 0- 1, 75.4) 411 A Plano West ( 3- 2, 81.9) 417 A Grapevine ( 4- 0, 88.6)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   213 H Flower Mound            8- 9      -1     1    -     -2.06
   221 H Cumberland Academy     18- 1      17     9           0.00
   228 A Fort Worth CDS         13- 7       6     3           1.93

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   213 H Flower Mound            8- 9      -1     1    -     -2.06

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Coppell Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alamo Heights Alamo Heights   Alamo Heights
All Saints Episcopal Coppell   Coppell
Allen Allen   Allen
Anderson Anderson   Anderson
Antonian College Pre Antonian College Pre   Antonian College Pre
Atascocita Coppell   Coppell
Austin Austin   Austin
Awty International Coppell   Coppell
Bellaire Coppell   Coppell
Bishop Lynch Coppell insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coppell
Boerne Coppell   Coppell
Bowie Bowie   Bowie
Bridge LC Bridge LC   Bridge LC
Canyon Coppell   Coppell
Central Catholic Coppell   Coppell
Clear Springs Coppell   Coppell
Concordia Lutheran Coppell   Coppell
Coronado El Paso Coronado El Paso   Coronado El Paso
Cumberland Academy Coppell Coppell  
Cypress Woods Cypress Woods   Cypress Woods
Dallas Jesuit Dallas Jesuit   Dallas Jesuit
Dallas Jesuit B Dallas Jesuit B   Dallas Jesuit B
Dripping Springs Dripping Springs   Dripping Springs
Emery-Weiner Coppell   Coppell
Episcopal Houston Episcopal Houston   Episcopal Houston
Episcopal Dallas Episcopal Dallas   Episcopal Dallas
Flower Mound Flower Mound Flower Mound  
Fort Worth CDS Coppell Coppell  
Friendswood Coppell   Coppell
Frisco Frisco   Frisco
Gateway Gateway   Gateway
George Ranch George Ranch   George Ranch
Georgetown Georgetown   Georgetown
Grapevine Grapevine insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Grapevine
Greenhill Coppell tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coppell
Guyer Coppell   Coppell
Hebron Hebron insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Hebron
Highland Park Highland Park   Highland Park
Highland Park B Highland Park B insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Highland Park B
Hillcrest Coppell tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coppell
Houston Christian Coppell   Coppell
Hyde Park Coppell   Coppell
John Paul II Coppell   Coppell
Katy Katy   Katy
Keller Keller   Keller
Kingwood Kingwood   Kingwood
Kinkaid Kinkaid   Kinkaid
Klein Klein   Klein
Lake Travis Lake Travis   Lake Travis
Lamar Lamar   Lamar
Liberty Hill Liberty Hill   Liberty Hill
Lovejoy Coppell   Coppell
Magnolia Magnolia   Magnolia
McKinney McKinney   McKinney
Memorial Memorial   Memorial
New Braunfels Coppell   Coppell
Parish Episcopal Coppell   Coppell
Pearland Coppell   Coppell
Plano Plano   Plano
Plano East Coppell   Coppell
Plano West Coppell tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coppell
Prosper Prosper   Prosper
Reagan Coppell   Coppell
Regents School Aust Coppell   Coppell
Ridge Point Ridge Point   Ridge Point
Rockwall Rockwall   Rockwall
Rouse Coppell   Coppell
Santa Fe LC Santa Fe LC   Santa Fe LC
Smithson Valley Coppell   Coppell
Southlake Southlake   Southlake
St Andrews St Andrews   St Andrews
St Johns Coppell   Coppell
St Marks St Marks   St Marks
St Marys Hall Coppell   Coppell
St Michaels Coppell   Coppell
St Pius X Coppell   Coppell
St Stephens Coppell   Coppell
St Thomas Coppell   Coppell
Stony Point Coppell   Coppell
Strake Jesuit Strake Jesuit   Strake Jesuit
Stratford Stratford   Stratford
Tascosa Tascosa   Tascosa
TMI Episcopal TMI Episcopal   TMI Episcopal
Trinity Valley Coppell   Coppell
Vandegrift Vandegrift   Vandegrift
Vista Ridge Vista Ridge   Vista Ridge
Westlake Westlake   Westlake
Westlake B Coppell   Coppell
Westside Coppell   Coppell
Westwood Westwood   Westwood
Woodlands Woodlands   Woodlands
Woodlands B Woodlands B   Woodlands B

PowerWise = 40


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 3.51

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Flower Mound    ( 1- 3, 83.1)     8- 9      -16.81       9.31      -0.42         1.17           -20.14
   0 H Cumberland Aca  ( 0- 4, 75.5)    18- 1      -24.41       1.71      -0.42         1.17             1.51
   0 A Fort Worth CDS  ( 1- 1, 80.2)    13- 7      -19.68       6.44       0.42         1.17             8.02
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -10.61

winning pts = 9.5304 losing points = -20.1413

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------