UPDATED: 04-05-26 08:40 PDT

boys Coppell 1
  
Coppell               
W-L: ( 5- 1) PR = 83.5049

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 213 H Flower Mound ( 2- 8, 80.0) 8- 9 221 H Cumberland Academy ( 0- 6, 71.4) 18- 1 228 A Fort Worth CDS ( 3- 5, 79.2) 13- 7 307 A Bridge LC ( 3- 3, 80.3) 14- 9 313 A John Paul II ( 7- 5, 79.7) 10- 5 327 A Parish Episcopal ( 5- 5, 76.9) 14- 3 403 H Guyer ( 3- 2, 79.3) 407 H Trinity Valley ( 0- 6, 70.3) 411 A Plano West ( 4- 6, 77.9) 417 A Grapevine ( 7- 0, 83.2)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   213 H Flower Mound            8- 9      -1     4    --    -4.94
   221 H Cumberland Academy     18- 1      17    12           0.00
   228 A Fort Worth CDS         13- 7       6     4           1.11
   307 A Bridge LC              14- 9       5     3    +      2.19
   313 A John Paul II           10- 5       5     3           1.57
   327 A Parish Episcopal       14- 3      11     6           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   213 H Flower Mound            8- 9      -1     4    --    -4.94

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   307 A Bridge LC              14- 9       5     3    +      2.19

Coppell Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alamo Heights Alamo Heights   Alamo Heights
All Saints Episcopal Coppell insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Coppell
Allen Coppell   Coppell
Anderson Anderson   Anderson
Antonian College Pre Coppell   Coppell
Atascocita Coppell   Coppell
Austin Austin   Austin
Awty International Coppell   Coppell
Bellaire Coppell   Coppell
Bishop Lynch Coppell Coppell   4- 0 vs 0- 4
Boerne Coppell   Coppell
Bowie Bowie   Bowie
Bridge LC Coppell Coppell  
Canyon Coppell   Coppell
Central Catholic Coppell insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coppell
Clear Springs Coppell   Coppell
Concordia Lutheran Coppell insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Coppell
Coronado El Paso Coppell   Coppell
Cumberland Academy Coppell Coppell  
Cypress Woods Cypress Woods   Cypress Woods
Dallas Jesuit Dallas Jesuit   Dallas Jesuit
Dallas Jesuit B Dallas Jesuit B insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Dallas Jesuit B
Dripping Springs Dripping Springs   Dripping Springs
Emery-Weiner Coppell   Coppell
Episcopal Houston Episcopal Houston   Episcopal Houston
Episcopal Dallas Episcopal Dallas   Episcopal Dallas
Flower Mound Flower Mound Flower Mound  
Fort Worth CDS Coppell Coppell  
Friendswood Coppell   Coppell
Frisco Coppell tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coppell
Gateway Gateway   Gateway
George Ranch Coppell   Coppell
Georgetown Coppell   Coppell
Grapevine Coppell insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 5- 0) Coppell
Greenhill Coppell Coppell   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Guyer Coppell insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Coppell
Hebron Hebron insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Hebron
Highland Park Highland Park   Highland Park
Highland Park B Coppell insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Coppell
Hillcrest Coppell insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Coppell
Houston Christian Coppell   Coppell
Hyde Park Coppell   Coppell
John Paul II Coppell Coppell  
Katy Katy   Katy
Keller Keller   Keller
Kingwood Coppell   Coppell
Kinkaid Kinkaid   Kinkaid
Klein Coppell   Coppell
Lake Travis Lake Travis   Lake Travis
Lamar Coppell   Coppell
Liberty Hill Coppell insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Coppell
Lovejoy Coppell   Coppell
Magnolia Magnolia   Magnolia
McKinney McKinney   McKinney
Memorial Memorial   Memorial
New Braunfels Coppell   Coppell
Parish Episcopal Coppell Coppell  
Pearland Coppell   Coppell
Plano Plano   Plano
Plano East Coppell tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Coppell
Plano West Coppell Coppell   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Prosper Prosper   Prosper
Reagan Coppell   Coppell
Regents School Aust Coppell tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coppell
Ridge Point Ridge Point   Ridge Point
Rockwall Rockwall insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Rockwall
Rouse Coppell   Coppell
Santa Fe LC Coppell   Coppell
Smithson Valley Coppell   Coppell
Southlake Southlake   Southlake
St Andrews Coppell tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coppell
St Johns St Johns   St Johns
St Marks St Marks   St Marks
St Marys Hall Coppell   Coppell
St Michaels Coppell insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coppell
St Pius X Coppell   Coppell
St Stephens Coppell tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Coppell
St Thomas Coppell   Coppell
Stony Point Coppell tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Coppell
Strake Jesuit Strake Jesuit   Strake Jesuit
Stratford Stratford   Stratford
Tascosa Coppell   Coppell
TMI Episcopal Coppell   Coppell
Trinity Valley Coppell insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Coppell
Vandegrift Vandegrift   Vandegrift
Vista Ridge Coppell   Coppell
Westlake Westlake   Westlake
Westlake B Coppell   Coppell
Westside Coppell   Coppell
Westwood Coppell   Coppell
Woodlands Woodlands   Woodlands
Woodlands B Coppell   Coppell

PowerWise = 59


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 7.12

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Flower Mound    ( 2- 8, 80.0)     8- 9      -19.92      12.46      -0.41         1.19           -24.12
   0 H Cumberland Aca  ( 0- 6, 71.4)    18- 1      -28.45       3.92      -0.41         1.19             4.17
   0 A Fort Worth CDS  ( 3- 5, 79.2)    13- 7      -20.70      11.68       0.41         1.19            14.34
   0 A Bridge LC       ( 3- 3, 80.3)    14- 9      -19.62      12.76       0.41         1.19            15.62
   0 A John Paul II    ( 7- 5, 79.7)    10- 5      -20.23      12.14       0.41         1.19            14.89
   0 A Parish Episcop  ( 5- 5, 76.9)    14- 3      -23.04       9.34       0.41         1.19            11.57
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        36.47

winning pts = 60.5939 losing points = -24.1194

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------