UPDATED: 04-05-26 08:40 PDT

boys Boiling Springs 1
  
Boiling Springs       
W-L: ( 7- 5) PR = 86.3314

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 224 H Lexington ( 5- 6, 85.7) 12- 9 228 A Mauldin ( 6- 4, 88.2) 7-11 307 H Hammond School ( 2- 4, 84.8) 11- 7 310 A Christ Church Episco ( 6- 3, 85.9) 9-10 313 H Eastside ( 4- 4, 85.9) 11-10 314 H Hillcrest ( 1- 6, 76.5) 19- 1 317 H Fort Mill ( 7- 1, 89.3) 5- 7 320 A Dorman ( 8- 2, 90.3) 9-16 323 H Wade Hampton ( 4- 4, 81.8) 18- 4 326 A Dutch Fork ( 4-10, 83.5) 11-10 331 H JL Mann Academy ( 3- 9, 83.4) 17- 8 403 A Spartanburg (10- 2, 89.4) 8-16 413 H Greenville ( 1- 8, 83.5) 417 H Byrnes ( 6- 4, 85.9) 421 A Riverside ( 5- 3, 84.8)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   224 H Lexington              12- 9       3     1           1.83
   228 A Mauldin                 7-11      -4    -2          -1.63
   307 H Hammond School         11- 7       4     2           1.95
   310 A Christ Church Episco    9-10      -1     0          -0.91
   313 H Eastside               11-10       1     1           0.03
   314 H Hillcrest              19- 1      18    10           0.00
   317 H Fort Mill               5- 7      -2    -2           0.38
   320 A Dorman                  9-16      -7    -5          -0.47
   323 H Wade Hampton           18- 4      14     5           0.00
   326 A Dutch Fork             11-10       1     2          -1.26
   331 H JL Mann Academy        17- 8       9     3           1.53
   403 A Spartanburg             8-16      -8    -4          -1.42

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Boiling Springs Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
AC Flora AC Flora tied - ( 4- 0) ( 4- 0) AC Flora
Academic Magnet Char Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Aiken Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Atlantic Collegiate Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Beaufort Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Bishop England Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Bluffton Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Blythewood Boiling Springs insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Boiling Springs
Byrnes Boiling Springs insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 3) Boiling Springs
Camden Military Acad Boiling Springs insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Boiling Springs
Carolina Forest Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Catawba Ridge Boiling Springs Boiling Springs   2- 2 vs 0- 4
Chapin Chapin tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Chapin
Christ Church Episco Christ Church Episco Christ Church Episco  
Clover Clover Clover   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Dorman Dorman Dorman  
Dutch Fork Boiling Springs Boiling Springs  
Eastside Boiling Springs Boiling Springs  
Fort Mill Fort Mill Fort Mill  
Fox Creek Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Gilbert Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Greenville Boiling Springs insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Boiling Springs
Hammond School Boiling Springs Boiling Springs  
Heathwood Hall Boiling Springs tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Boiling Springs
Hillcrest Boiling Springs Boiling Springs  
Hilton Head Boiling Springs tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Boiling Springs
Hilton Head Christia Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
James Island Charter Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
JL Mann Academy Boiling Springs Boiling Springs  
Laurence Manning Aca Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Legion Collegiate Ac Legion Collegiate Ac tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Legion Collegiate Ac
Lexington Boiling Springs Boiling Springs  
Lucy Beckham Lucy Beckham   Lucy Beckham
Mauldin Mauldin Mauldin  
May River May River May River   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Myrtle Beach Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Nation Ford Nation Ford tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Nation Ford
North Myrtle Beach Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Oceanside Academy Oceanside Academy insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Oceanside Academy
Philip Simmons Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Porter-Gaud Porter-Gaud   Porter-Gaud
River Bluff River Bluff insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) River Bluff
Riverside Boiling Springs tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Boiling Springs
Socastee Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Spartanburg Spartanburg Spartanburg  
Spring Valley Boiling Springs Boiling Springs   3- 0 vs 0- 3
St James Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
St Joseph Catholic Boiling Springs Boiling Springs   2- 1 vs 0- 3
TL Hanna Boiling Springs insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Boiling Springs
Trinity Collegiate Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Waccamaw Boiling Springs   Boiling Springs
Wade Hampton Boiling Springs Boiling Springs  
Wando Wando   Wando
Westside Boiling Springs insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Boiling Springs
White Knoll Boiling Springs Boiling Springs   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Woodmont Boiling Springs insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Boiling Springs

PowerWise = 40


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.14

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Lexington       ( 5- 6, 85.7)    12- 9      -14.19      14.37      -0.55         0.68             9.37
   0 A Mauldin         ( 6- 4, 88.2)     7-11      -11.74      16.81       0.55         0.68            -7.60
   0 H Hammond School  ( 2- 4, 84.8)    11- 7      -15.07      13.48      -0.55         0.68             8.77
   0 A Christ Church   ( 6- 3, 85.9)     9-10      -14.03      14.53       0.55         0.68            -9.14
   0 H Eastside        ( 4- 4, 85.9)    11-10      -13.99      14.56      -0.55         0.68             9.51
   0 H Hillcrest       ( 1- 6, 76.5)    19- 1      -23.39       5.17      -0.55         0.68             3.14
   0 H Fort Mill       ( 7- 1, 89.3)     5- 7      -10.64      17.92      -0.55         0.68            -7.59
   0 A Dorman          ( 8- 2, 90.3)     9-16       -9.58      18.97       0.55         0.68            -6.13
   0 H Wade Hampton    ( 4- 4, 81.8)    18- 4      -18.08      10.47      -0.55         0.68             6.73
   0 A Dutch Fork      ( 4-10, 83.5)    11-10      -16.38      12.17       0.55         0.68             8.63
   0 H JL Mann Academ  ( 3- 9, 83.4)    17- 8      -16.49      12.07      -0.55         0.68             7.81
   0 A Spartanburg     (10- 2, 89.4)     8-16      -10.54      18.01       0.55         0.68            -6.78
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        16.73

winning pts = 53.9692 losing points = -37.2362

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------