Bishop Gorman
W-L: ( 4- 3) PR = 94.8597Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 224 H Faith Lutheran ( 3- 1, 98.6) 7-15 303 H Palo Verde ( 6- 0, 99.9) 6-10 306 H Spanish Springs ( 8- 3, 92.2) 13- 5 310 H Clark County ( 0- 3, 85.5) 19- 2 324 A Coronado ( 0- 1, 92.9) 12-11 403 A Palo Verde ( 6- 0, 99.9) 7-19 410 A Foothill Hendersonvi ( 0- 3, 85.0) 20- 4 417 H Coronado ( 0- 1, 92.9) 424 A Faith Lutheran ( 3- 1, 98.6) 428 A Clark County ( 0- 3, 85.5) 429 H Foothill Hendersonvi ( 0- 3, 85.0)
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
224 H Faith Lutheran 7-15 -8 -3 -1.65
303 H Palo Verde 6-10 -4 -5 0.63
306 H Spanish Springs 13- 5 8 3 1.96
310 H Clark County 19- 2 17 10 0.00
324 A Coronado 12-11 1 2 -0.51
403 A Palo Verde 7-19 -12 -5 0.00
410 A Foothill Hendersonvi 20- 4 16 9 0.00
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop Manogue | Bishop Manogue | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Bishop Manogue | |
| Centennial | Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | ||
| Clark County | Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | ||
| Coronado | Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | ||
| Damonte Ranch | Bishop Gorman | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Gorman | |
| Douglas | Bishop Gorman | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Gorman | |
| Faith Lutheran | Faith Lutheran | Faith Lutheran | ||
| Foothill Hendersonvi | Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | ||
| Galena | Bishop Gorman | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Gorman | |
| McQueen | Bishop Gorman | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Gorman | |
| Palo Verde | Palo Verde | Palo Verde | ||
| Reed | Bishop Gorman | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Gorman | |
| Reno | Bishop Gorman | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Gorman | |
| Spanish Springs | Bishop Gorman | Bishop Gorman | ||
| Truckee/North Tahoe | Bishop Gorman | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Bishop Gorman |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Faith Lutheran ( 3- 1, 98.6) 7-15 -1.28 23.17 -0.41 0.82 -1.39
0 H Palo Verde ( 6- 0, 99.9) 6-10 -0.00 24.45 -0.41 0.82 -0.34
0 H Spanish Spring ( 8- 3, 92.2) 13- 5 -7.67 16.78 -0.41 0.82 13.45
0 H Clark County ( 0- 3, 85.5) 19- 2 -14.41 10.04 -0.41 0.82 7.91
0 A Coronado ( 0- 1, 92.9) 12-11 -6.96 17.48 0.41 0.82 14.70
0 A Palo Verde ( 6- 0, 99.9) 7-19 -0.00 24.45 0.41 0.82 -0.34
0 A Foothill Hende ( 0- 3, 85.0) 20- 4 -14.90 9.55 0.41 0.82 8.18
------
42.17
|