UPDATED: 05-01-26 10:12 PDT

boys Barrington 1
  
Barrington            
W-L: ( 5- 2) PR = 94.1891

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 330 H North Kingstown ( 2- 4, 94.6) 6- 5 401 H Bishop Hendricken ( 3- 3, 92.0) 8- 7 408 H La Salle Academy ( 4- 0, 99.9) 3-15 413 H Moses Brown School ( 4- 0, 99.9) 5-11 415 A Portsmouth ( 9- 2, 94.0) 6- 5 417 H Smithfield ( 0-11, 85.4) 15- 2 427 H Cumberland ( 1- 4, 89.5) 9- 3 430 A La Salle Academy ( 4- 0, 99.9) 511 A North Kingstown ( 2- 4, 94.6)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   330 H North Kingstown         6- 5       1     0           0.71
   401 H Bishop Hendricken       8- 7       1     3          -1.88
   408 H La Salle Academy        3-15     -12    -5           0.00
   413 H Moses Brown School      5-11      -6    -5           0.00
   415 A Portsmouth              6- 5       1     0           1.45
   417 H Smithfield             15- 2      13     9           0.00
   427 H Cumberland              9- 3       6     5           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Barrington PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Bishop Hendricken Barrington Barrington  
Burrillville Barrington   Barrington
Chariho Barrington Barrington   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Classical Barrington   Barrington
Coventry Barrington   Barrington
Cranston East Barrington   Barrington
Cranston West Barrington Barrington   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Cumberland Barrington Barrington  
East Greenwich East Greenwich tied -  2- 0 East Greenwich
East Providence Barrington   Barrington
La Salle Academy La Salle Academy La Salle Academy  
Lincoln Barrington   Barrington
Middletown Barrington tied -  1- 0 Barrington
Moses Brown School Moses Brown School Moses Brown School  
Mount Hope Barrington tied -  1- 0 Barrington
Narragansett Barrington   Barrington
North Kingstown Barrington Barrington  
North Providence Barrington   Barrington
North Smithfield Barrington   Barrington
Pilgrim Barrington Barrington   3- 2 vs 2- 3
Ponaganset Barrington   Barrington
Portsmouth Barrington Barrington  
Prout/Exeter-West Gr Barrington Barrington   3- 0 vs 2- 1
Providence CDS-St Ra Barrington   Barrington
Rogers Barrington   Barrington
Scituate Barrington   Barrington
Smithfield Barrington Barrington  
South Kingstown Barrington Barrington   3- 1 vs 1- 3
Tiverton Barrington   Barrington
Toll Gate Barrington Barrington   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Westerly Barrington Barrington   1- 0 vs 0- 1

PairWisePlus = 28


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 6.44

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H North Kingstow  ( 2- 4, 94.6)     6- 5       -5.33      21.83      -0.68         0.92            19.45
   0 H Bishop Hendric  ( 3- 3, 92.0)     8- 7       -7.91      19.24      -0.68         0.92            17.07
   0 H La Salle Acade  ( 4- 0, 99.9)     3-15       -0.00      27.16      -0.68         0.92            -0.63
   0 H Moses Brown Sc  ( 4- 0, 99.9)     5-11       -0.00      27.16      -0.68         0.92            -0.63
   0 A Portsmouth      ( 9- 2, 94.0)     6- 5       -5.94      21.22       0.68         0.92            20.14
   0 H Smithfield      ( 0-11, 85.4)    15- 2      -14.47      12.69      -0.68         0.92            11.04
   0 H Cumberland      ( 1- 4, 89.5)     9- 3      -10.42      16.74      -0.68         0.92            14.77
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        81.23

winning pts = 82.4766 losing points = -1.2500

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------