Bow
W-L: ( 4- 0) PR = 93.7422Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 415 A Kearsarge ( 1- 4, 85.8) 11- 2 417 H Bishop Brady ( 1- 2, 89.5) 10- 7 420 H Trinity Manchester ( 1- 3, 89.4) 16- 4 422 A John Stark ( 1- 3, 90.4) 10- 6 504 H Gilford ( 2- 2, 91.2) 506 A Stevens ( 0- 3, 81.2) 509 A Campbell ( 2- 3, 91.4) 512 H Lebanon ( 1- 1, 93.8) 513 H Milford ( 1- 3, 85.9) 518 A Laconia ( 3- 2, 92.2) 520 H Pelham ( 2- 2, 90.0) 522 A Plymouth Regional ( 4- 1, 95.8) 526 H ConVal ( 2- 1, 92.2) 527 A Coe-Brown ( 5- 0, 98.7)
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
415 A Kearsarge 11- 2 9 8 0.00
417 H Bishop Brady 10- 7 3 4 -1.28
420 H Trinity Manchester 16- 4 12 4 0.57
422 A John Stark 10- 6 4 3 0.68
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Bow | Bow | ||
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford | ||
| Bishop Brady | Bow | Bow | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Campbell | Bow | Bow | ||
| Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | ||
| Concord | Bow | Bow | ||
| ConVal | Bow | tied - 1- 0 | Bow | |
| Derryfield | Derryfield | Derryfield | ||
| Dover | Dover | Dover | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Bow | tied - 1- 0 | Bow | |
| Goffstown | Bow | Bow | ||
| Hanover | Bow | Bow | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Bow | Bow | ||
| Hopkinton | Bow | tied - 1- 0 | Bow | |
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Bow | Bow | ||
| John Stark | Bow | Bow | ||
| Kearsarge | Bow | Bow | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Bow | Bow | ||
| Kennett | Bow | tied - 1- 0 | Bow | |
| Kingswood | Bow | Bow | ||
| Laconia | Bow | tied - 2- 0 | Bow | |
| Lebanon | Lebanon | Lebanon | ||
| Londonderry | Bow | Bow | ||
| Manchester Memorial- | Bow | Bow | ||
| Merrimack | Merrimack | Merrimack | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Bow | Bow | ||
| Milford | Bow | Bow | ||
| Nashua North | Bow | Bow | ||
| Nashua South | Bow | Bow | ||
| Oyster River-Newmark | Bow | Bow | ||
| Pelham | Bow | Bow 2- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Bow | Bow 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | tied - 1- 0 | Plymouth Regional | |
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | Bow | Bow | ||
| Souhegan | Bow | Bow | ||
| Spaulding | Bow | Bow | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | Bow | Bow | ||
| Stevens | Bow | Bow 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Timberlane | Timberlane | Timberlane | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Bow | Bow | ||
| Windham | Bow | Bow | ||
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Kearsarge ( 1- 4, 85.8) 11- 2 -14.14 4.59 0.04 0.96 4.44
0 H Bishop Brady ( 1- 2, 89.5) 10- 7 -10.39 8.34 -0.04 0.96 7.94
0 H Trinity Manche ( 1- 3, 89.4) 16- 4 -10.54 8.19 -0.04 0.96 7.79
0 A John Stark ( 1- 3, 90.4) 10- 6 -9.53 9.20 0.04 0.96 8.85
------
29.03
|