UPDATED: 04-04-26 09:08 PDT

boys Bountiful 1
  
Bountiful             
W-L: ( 7- 1) PR = 93.0039

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 303 H Box Elder ( 5- 3, 89.7) 8- 4 309 H Payson ( 6- 4, 88.6) 16- 4 311 H Northridge ( 3- 5, 84.7) 16- 7 313 A Park City ( 7- 0, 99.9) 5-16 317 H Bingham ( 6- 2, 90.6) 9- 6 320 H Syracuse ( 6- 2, 85.3) 20- 5 324 H Lone Peak ( 3- 7, 86.7) 11- 8 327 A East ( 6- 4, 90.3) 17-10 410 H Davis ( 5- 3, 88.1) 417 A Viewmont ( 4- 5, 81.6) 420 A Highland ( 3- 5, 84.4) 422 H Olympus ( 5- 2, 95.2) 424 H Brighton ( 5- 2, 96.9) 429 A Woods Cross ( 1- 8, 83.9) 501 H Skyline ( 2- 6, 86.2) 506 A Alta ( 6- 1, 95.5)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   303 H Box Elder               8- 4       4     4           0.40
   309 H Payson                 16- 4      12     5           0.32
   311 H Northridge             16- 7       9     9           0.00
   313 A Park City               5-16     -11    -7           0.00
   317 H Bingham                 9- 6       3     3           0.34
   320 H Syracuse               20- 5      15     8           0.00
   324 H Lone Peak              11- 8       3     7    -     -2.00
   327 A East                   17-10       7     2    +      2.56

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   324 H Lone Peak              11- 8       3     7    -     -2.00

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   327 A East                   17-10       7     2    +      2.56

Bountiful Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alta Alta tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Alta
American Fork Bountiful   Bountiful
Bear River Bountiful insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bountiful
Bingham Bountiful Bountiful  
Bonneville Bountiful Bountiful   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Box Elder Bountiful Bountiful  
Brighton Brighton tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Brighton
Canyon View Bountiful   Bountiful
Cedar Bountiful   Bountiful
Cedar Valley Bountiful insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bountiful
Clearfield Bountiful Bountiful   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Copper Hills Bountiful   Bountiful
Corner Canyon Corner Canyon tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Corner Canyon
Crimson Cliffs Bountiful insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bountiful
Davis Bountiful insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Bountiful
Desert Hills Bountiful   Bountiful
Dixie Bountiful   Bountiful
East Bountiful Bountiful  
Farmington Farmington tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Farmington
Fremont Bountiful Bountiful   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Green Canyon Bountiful   Bountiful
Herriman Bountiful tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bountiful
Highland Bountiful insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bountiful
Hillcrest Bountiful tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Bountiful
Hurricane Bountiful   Bountiful
Jordan Bountiful Bountiful   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Juan Diego Catholic Bountiful tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bountiful
Judge Memorial Catho Judge Memorial Catho   Judge Memorial Catho
Layton Bountiful Bountiful   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Lehi Bountiful tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bountiful
Logan Bountiful   Bountiful
Lone Peak Bountiful Bountiful  
Maple Mountain Bountiful Bountiful   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Mountain Crest Bountiful   Bountiful
Mountain Ridge Bountiful tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bountiful
Mountain View Bountiful insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bountiful
Northridge Bountiful Bountiful  
Olympus Olympus tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Olympus
Orem Bountiful   Bountiful
Park City Park City Park City  
Payson Bountiful Bountiful  
Pine View Bountiful   Bountiful
Pleasant Grove Bountiful insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bountiful
Provo Bountiful   Bountiful
Ridgeline Bountiful   Bountiful
Riverton Bountiful   Bountiful
Roy Bountiful Bountiful   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Salem Hills Bountiful insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bountiful
Sky View Bountiful   Bountiful
Skyline Bountiful Bountiful   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Skyridge Skyridge   Skyridge
Snow Canyon Bountiful insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bountiful
Spanish Fork Bountiful insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Bountiful
Springville Bountiful   Bountiful
Syracuse Bountiful Bountiful  
Timpanogos Bountiful insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bountiful
Timpview Bountiful   Bountiful
Viewmont Bountiful   Bountiful
Wasatch Wasatch tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Wasatch
Waterford Bountiful tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bountiful
Weber Bountiful   Bountiful
West Bountiful   Bountiful
West Field Bountiful tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Bountiful
West Jordan Bountiful   Bountiful
Westlake Bountiful tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bountiful
Woods Cross Bountiful Bountiful   4- 0 vs 0- 4

PowerWise = 57


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.36

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Box Elder       ( 5- 3, 89.7)     8- 4      -10.23      17.15      -0.26         1.04            17.65
   0 H Payson          ( 6- 4, 88.6)    16- 4      -11.32      16.07      -0.26         1.04            16.51
   0 H Northridge      ( 3- 5, 84.7)    16- 7      -15.18      12.20      -0.26         1.04            12.48
   0 A Park City       ( 7- 0, 99.9)     5-16       -0.00      27.38       0.26         1.04            -0.27
   0 H Bingham         ( 6- 2, 90.6)     9- 6       -9.29      18.09      -0.26         1.04            18.62
   0 H Syracuse        ( 6- 2, 85.3)    20- 5      -14.64      12.75      -0.26         1.04            13.04
   0 H Lone Peak       ( 3- 7, 86.7)    11- 8      -13.18      14.21      -0.26         1.04            14.57
   0 A East            ( 6- 4, 90.3)    17-10       -9.60      17.79       0.26         1.04            18.86
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       111.45

winning pts = 111.7241 losing points = -0.2743

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------