Bismarck-Mandan LC
W-L: ( 7- 7) PR = 95.0559Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 502 N Watertown LC ( 0-12, 90.2) 12- 1 502 A Red River Valley LC (15- 0, 99.9) 1-13 503 N Grand Cities LC ( 7- 8, 95.1) 7-10 509 N Red River Valley LC (15- 0, 99.9) 4- 9 509 N Grand Cities LC ( 7- 8, 95.1) 10- 9 509 A Black Hills LC ( 5- 7, 94.6) 8- 7 516 A Grand Cities LC ( 7- 8, 95.1) 12- 8 516 N Red River Valley LC (15- 0, 99.9) 4-10 517 N Black Hills LC ( 5- 7, 94.6) 8-11 530 N Red River Valley LC (15- 0, 99.9) 3- 8 531 A Watertown LC ( 0-12, 90.2) 14- 3 531 N Black Hills LC ( 5- 7, 94.6) 10- 9 606 H Black Hills LC ( 5- 7, 94.6) 7- 6 607 N Red River Valley LC (15- 0, 99.9) 3-13
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
502 N Watertown LC 12- 1 11 5 0.11
502 A Red River Valley LC 1-13 -12 -5 -0.15
503 N Grand Cities LC 7-10 -3 0 - -2.91
509 N Red River Valley LC 4- 9 -5 -5 -0.16
509 N Grand Cities LC 10- 9 1 0 1.09
509 A Black Hills LC 8- 7 1 0 0.57
516 A Grand Cities LC 12- 8 4 0 ++ 4.10
516 N Red River Valley LC 4-10 -6 -5 -0.16
517 N Black Hills LC 8-11 -3 0 - -3.44
530 N Red River Valley LC 3- 8 -5 -5 -0.16
531 A Watertown LC 14- 3 11 5 0.12
531 N Black Hills LC 10- 9 1 0 0.56
606 H Black Hills LC 7- 6 1 0 0.55
607 N Red River Valley LC 3-13 -10 -5 -0.16
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 503 N Grand Cities LC 7-10 -3 0 - -2.91 517 N Black Hills LC 8-11 -3 0 - -3.44 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 516 A Grand Cities LC 12- 8 4 0 ++ 4.10 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Black Hills LC | Bismarck-Mandan LC | Bismarck-Mandan LC | ||
| Grand Cities LC | Bismarck-Mandan LC | Bismarck-Mandan LC | ||
| Red River Valley LC | Red River Valley LC | Red River Valley LC | ||
| Watertown LC | Bismarck-Mandan LC | Bismarck-Mandan LC |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 N Watertown LC ( 0-12, 90.2) 12- 1 -9.73 1.00 -0.00 0.97 0.97
0 A Red River Vall (15- 0, 99.9) 1-13 -0.00 9.73 0.01 0.97 -0.01
0 N Grand Cities L ( 7- 8, 95.1) 7-10 -4.75 4.98 -0.00 0.97 -4.62
0 N Red River Vall (15- 0, 99.9) 4- 9 -0.00 9.73 -0.00 0.97 -0.00
0 N Grand Cities L ( 7- 8, 95.1) 10- 9 -4.75 4.98 -0.00 0.97 4.83
0 A Black Hills LC ( 5- 7, 94.6) 8- 7 -5.28 4.45 0.01 0.97 4.33
0 A Grand Cities L ( 7- 8, 95.1) 12- 8 -4.75 4.98 0.01 0.97 4.84
0 N Red River Vall (15- 0, 99.9) 4-10 -0.00 9.73 -0.00 0.97 -0.00
0 N Black Hills LC ( 5- 7, 94.6) 8-11 -5.28 4.45 -0.00 0.97 -5.13
0 N Red River Vall (15- 0, 99.9) 3- 8 -0.00 9.73 -0.00 0.97 -0.00
0 A Watertown LC ( 0-12, 90.2) 14- 3 -9.73 1.00 0.01 0.97 0.98
0 N Black Hills LC ( 5- 7, 94.6) 10- 9 -5.28 4.45 -0.00 0.97 4.32
0 H Black Hills LC ( 5- 7, 94.6) 7- 6 -5.28 4.45 -0.01 0.97 4.31
0 N Red River Vall (15- 0, 99.9) 3-13 -0.00 9.73 -0.00 0.97 -0.00
------
14.84
|