UPDATED: 04-29-26 08:54 PDT

boys Bishop Kelly 1
  
Bishop Kelly          
W-L: ( 6- 2) PR = 95.4338

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 311 A Mountain View ( 4- 5, 91.6) 15- 3 325 H Rocky Mountain ( 6- 1, 96.2) 11-12 401 A Eagle ( 2- 6, 88.9) 15-10 410 H Vallivue ( 1- 6, 86.2) 20- 1 415 H Timberline ( 5- 0, 99.9) 3-13 421 H Kuna ( 3- 5, 89.1) 18- 1 423 A Boise ( 4- 5, 91.0) 12- 2 428 H Middleton ( 1- 5, 84.2) 22- 3

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   311 A Mountain View          15- 3      12     3           1.79
   325 H Rocky Mountain         11-12      -1     0          -0.81
   401 A Eagle                  15-10       5     6           0.00
   410 H Vallivue               20- 1      19    10           0.00
   415 H Timberline              3-13     -10    -4          -1.12
   421 H Kuna                   18- 1      17     7           0.00
   423 A Boise                  12- 2      10     4           1.11
   428 H Middleton              22- 3      19    12           0.00

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Bishop Kelly PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Ammon Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Boise Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly  
Borah/Capital Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly   4- 0 vs 3- 1
Centennial Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Chesterton of Notre Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Coeur d'Alene Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Eagle Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly  
Emmett Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly   2- 1 vs 1- 2
Idaho Falls Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Immaculate Conceptio Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Jackson Hole Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly   2- 1 vs 1- 2
Kuna Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly  
Lake City Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Logos Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Magic Valley Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Meridian Bishop Kelly tied -  5- 0 Bishop Kelly
Middleton Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly  
Mountain View Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly  
Owyhee Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Pocatello Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain Rocky Mountain  
Sandpoint Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Spokane Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Spokane Valley Spokane Valley   Spokane Valley
Sun Valley Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Teton Valley Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Timberline Timberline Timberline  
Vallivue Bishop Kelly Bishop Kelly  
Gonzaga Prep Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Lewis & Clark Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Mead Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly
Mount Spokane Bishop Kelly   Bishop Kelly

PairWisePlus = 29


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 5.21

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Mountain View   ( 4- 5, 91.6)    15- 3       -8.26      11.51       0.58         0.65             7.88
   0 H Rocky Mountain  ( 6- 1, 96.2)    11-12       -3.69      16.08      -0.58         0.65            -2.78
   0 A Eagle           ( 2- 6, 88.9)    15-10      -11.02       8.75       0.58         0.65             6.08
   0 H Vallivue        ( 1- 6, 86.2)    20- 1      -13.69       6.08      -0.58         0.65             3.58
   0 H Timberline      ( 5- 0, 99.9)     3-13       -0.00      19.77      -0.58         0.65            -0.38
   0 H Kuna            ( 3- 5, 89.1)    18- 1      -10.79       8.97      -0.58         0.65             5.47
   0 A Boise           ( 4- 5, 91.0)    12- 2       -8.93      10.84       0.58         0.65             7.44
   0 H Middleton       ( 1- 5, 84.2)    22- 3      -15.65       4.12      -0.58         0.65             2.30
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        29.58

winning pts = 32.7428 losing points = -3.1620

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------