UPDATED: 04-04-26 09:08 PDT

boys Bingham 1
  
Bingham               
W-L: ( 6- 2) PR = 90.6052

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 306 H Alta ( 6- 1, 95.5) 6- 9 310 H Spanish Fork ( 6- 4, 86.2) 13- 4 312 H Payson ( 6- 4, 88.6) 8- 7 317 A Bountiful ( 7- 1, 93.0) 6- 9 319 H Layton ( 1- 5, 77.4) 16- 2 321 A Woods Cross ( 1- 8, 83.9) 17- 5 325 A Salem Hills ( 2- 6, 82.6) 16- 4 327 A Davis ( 5- 3, 88.1) 10- 8 410 A West Jordan ( 1- 8, 79.6) 414 A Cedar Valley ( 0- 8, 82.0) 416 H Westlake ( 7- 2, 90.0) 421 H Riverton ( 6- 3, 90.1) 423 A Herriman ( 5- 3, 89.0) 428 A Mountain Ridge ( 6- 2, 90.2) 501 A American Fork ( 7- 4, 84.3) 505 H Copper Hills ( 2- 5, 84.4) 508 H Pleasant Grove ( 8- 2, 88.6)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   306 H Alta                    6- 9      -3    -5           1.63
   310 H Spanish Fork           13- 4       9     5           0.30
   312 H Payson                  8- 7       1     2          -1.28
   317 A Bountiful               6- 9      -3    -3          -0.34
   319 H Layton                 16- 2      14    13           0.00
   321 A Woods Cross            17- 5      12     6           0.00
   325 A Salem Hills            16- 4      12     8           0.00
   327 A Davis                  10- 8       2     2          -0.23

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Bingham Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alta Alta Alta  
American Fork Bingham insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Bingham
Bear River Bingham tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bingham
Bonneville Bingham   Bingham
Bountiful Bountiful Bountiful  
Box Elder Bingham tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Bingham
Brighton Brighton   Brighton
Canyon View Bingham insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bingham
Cedar Bingham   Bingham
Cedar Valley Bingham Bingham   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Clearfield Bingham insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bingham
Copper Hills Bingham   Bingham
Corner Canyon Corner Canyon tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 0) Corner Canyon
Crimson Cliffs Bingham insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bingham
Davis Bingham Bingham  
Desert Hills Bingham   Bingham
Dixie Bingham tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bingham
East Bingham tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Bingham
Farmington Farmington tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Farmington
Fremont Bingham   Bingham
Green Canyon Bingham tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bingham
Herriman Bingham   Bingham
Highland Bingham Bingham   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Hillcrest Bingham   Bingham
Hurricane Bingham   Bingham
Jordan Bingham insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bingham
Juan Diego Catholic Juan Diego Catholic   Juan Diego Catholic
Judge Memorial Catho Judge Memorial Catho tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Judge Memorial Catho
Layton Bingham Bingham  
Lehi Bingham   Bingham
Logan Bingham insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bingham
Lone Peak Bingham insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Bingham
Maple Mountain Bingham   Bingham
Mountain Crest Bingham   Bingham
Mountain Ridge Bingham   Bingham
Mountain View Bingham insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bingham
Northridge Bingham tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Bingham
Olympus Olympus   Olympus
Orem Bingham Bingham   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Park City Park City Park City   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Payson Bingham Bingham  
Pine View Bingham   Bingham
Pleasant Grove Bingham   Bingham
Provo Bingham insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bingham
Ridgeline Bingham   Bingham
Riverton Bingham tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bingham
Roy Bingham   Bingham
Salem Hills Bingham Bingham  
Sky View Bingham tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bingham
Skyline Bingham insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Bingham
Skyridge Skyridge   Skyridge
Snow Canyon Bingham   Bingham
Spanish Fork Bingham Bingham  
Springville Bingham   Bingham
Syracuse Bingham tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Bingham
Timpanogos Bingham insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bingham
Timpview Bingham   Bingham
Viewmont Bingham insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Bingham
Wasatch Wasatch tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Wasatch
Waterford Bingham tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bingham
Weber Weber tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) Weber
West Bingham   Bingham
West Field West Field tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) West Field
West Jordan Bingham insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Bingham
Westlake Bingham tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Bingham
Woods Cross Bingham Bingham  

PowerWise = 53


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.36

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Alta            ( 6- 1, 95.5)     6- 9       -4.40      22.98      -0.26         1.04            -4.87
   0 H Spanish Fork    ( 6- 4, 86.2)    13- 4      -13.73      13.65      -0.26         1.04            13.98
   0 H Payson          ( 6- 4, 88.6)     8- 7      -11.32      16.07      -0.26         1.04            16.51
   0 A Bountiful       ( 7- 1, 93.0)     6- 9       -6.90      20.49       0.26         1.04            -6.93
   0 H Layton          ( 1- 5, 77.4)    16- 2      -22.47       4.92      -0.26         1.04             4.86
   0 A Woods Cross     ( 1- 8, 83.9)    17- 5      -16.00      11.38       0.26         1.04            12.17
   0 A Salem Hills     ( 2- 6, 82.6)    16- 4      -17.27      10.11       0.26         1.04            10.84
   0 A Davis           ( 5- 3, 88.1)    10- 8      -11.78      15.60       0.26         1.04            16.57
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        63.13

winning pts = 74.9350 losing points = -11.8012

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------