Bishop Guertin
W-L: ( 7- 1) PR = 99.9000
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
413 H Londonderry ( 5- 5, 91.8) 18- 5
420 A Manchester Memorial- ( 1- 8, 82.3) 16- 5
423 H Windham ( 7- 5, 90.8) 13- 3
427 A Concord ( 4- 7, 89.6) 19- 3
501 H Salem ( 1-11, 82.3) 24- 0
505 H Bedford ( 7- 1, 97.5) 12- 1
508 A Nashua North ( 3- 9, 86.5) 20- 2
511 H Pinkerton Academy ( 8- 0, 99.5) 8- 9
514 H Merrimack ( 6- 4, 90.6)
518 H Exeter HS ( 8- 2, 96.6)
520 A Keene-Monadnock ( 3- 6, 86.2)
527 A Exeter HS ( 8- 2, 96.6)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
413 H Londonderry 18- 5 13 9 0.00
420 A Manchester Memorial- 16- 5 11 17 0.00
423 H Windham 13- 3 10 9 0.00
427 A Concord 19- 3 16 10 0.00
501 H Salem 24- 0 24 18 0.00
505 H Bedford 12- 1 11 3 + 2.18
508 A Nashua North 20- 2 18 13 0.00
511 H Pinkerton Academy 8- 9 -1 1 -1.82
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
505 H Bedford 12- 1 11 3 + 2.18
|
Bishop Guertin PairWisePlus Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
| Alvirne |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Bedford |
Bishop Guertin |
Bishop Guertin |
 
| |
| Bishop Brady |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Bow |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Campbell |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Coe-Brown |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Concord |
Bishop Guertin |
Bishop Guertin |
 
| |
| ConVal |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Derryfield |
Bishop Guertin |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Bishop Guertin |
| Dover |
Bishop Guertin |
|
Bishop Guertin   3- 1 vs 2- 2 |
|
| Exeter HS |
Bishop Guertin |
|
Bishop Guertin   6- 1 vs 5- 2 |
|
| Gilford |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Goffstown |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Hanover |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Hollis-Brookline |
Bishop Guertin |
|
Bishop Guertin   1- 0 vs 0- 1 |
|
| Hopkinton |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| John Stark |
Bishop Guertin |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Bishop Guertin |
| Kearsarge |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Keene-Monadnock |
Bishop Guertin |
|
Bishop Guertin   5- 1 vs 3- 3 |
|
| Kennett |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Kingswood |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Laconia |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Lebanon |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Londonderry |
Bishop Guertin |
Bishop Guertin |
 
| |
| Manchester Memorial- |
Bishop Guertin |
Bishop Guertin |
 
| |
| Merrimack |
Bishop Guertin |
|
Bishop Guertin   4- 1 vs 2- 3 |
|
| Merrimack Valley |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Milford |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Nashua North |
Bishop Guertin |
Bishop Guertin |
 
| |
| Nashua South |
Bishop Guertin |
|
Bishop Guertin   6- 1 vs 3- 4 |
|
| Oyster River-Newmark |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Pelham |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Pembroke Academy |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Pinkerton Academy |
Pinkerton Academy |
Pinkerton Academy |
 
| |
| Plymouth Regional |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Portsmouth |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Salem |
Bishop Guertin |
Bishop Guertin |
 
| |
| Souhegan |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Spaulding |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| St Thomas Aquinas |
Bishop Guertin |
|
Bishop Guertin   2- 0 vs 1- 1 |
|
| Stevens |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Timberlane |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Trinity Manchester |
Bishop Guertin |
|
 
| Bishop Guertin |
| Windham |
Bishop Guertin |
Bishop Guertin |
 
| |
| Winnacunnet |
Bishop Guertin |
|
tied -  1- 0 |
Bishop Guertin |
PairWisePlus = 45

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 9.36
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Londonderry ( 5- 5, 91.8) 18- 5 -8.12 16.27 -0.40 1.17 18.58
0 A Manchester Mem ( 1- 8, 82.3) 16- 5 -17.61 6.79 0.40 1.17 8.41
0 H Windham ( 7- 5, 90.8) 13- 3 -9.06 15.33 -0.40 1.17 17.48
0 A Concord ( 4- 7, 89.6) 19- 3 -10.29 14.10 0.40 1.17 16.97
0 H Salem ( 1-11, 82.3) 24- 0 -17.56 6.84 -0.40 1.17 7.54
0 H Bedford ( 7- 1, 97.5) 12- 1 -2.42 21.97 -0.40 1.17 25.25
0 A Nashua North ( 3- 9, 86.5) 20- 2 -13.44 10.96 0.40 1.17 13.29
0 H Pinkerton Acad ( 8- 0, 99.5) 8- 9 -0.42 23.97 -0.40 1.17 -0.96
------
106.55
|
winning pts = 107.5089 losing points = -0.9561
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------