Bishop Brady
W-L: ( 4- 3) PR = 84.3691Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 413 H Hopkinton ( 6- 3, 85.6) 11-12 415 H Pembroke Academy ( 1- 9, 81.2) 9- 8 417 A Bow ( 8- 1, 88.2) 7-10 423 A Hopkinton ( 6- 3, 85.6) 7-16 424 H Milford ( 1- 9, 80.8) 12- 2 507 A Gilford ( 3- 6, 83.6) 6- 5 508 A ConVal ( 5- 4, 86.1) 6- 5 512 A Trinity Manchester ( 3- 6, 84.7) 516 H Coe-Brown (10- 0, 91.1) 518 H Plymouth Regional ( 9- 2, 88.0) 519 A Kennett ( 5- 3, 85.9) 520 H John Stark ( 3- 7, 83.3) 522 H Campbell ( 4- 6, 84.9) 525 A Lebanon ( 6- 1, 87.8) 527 H Trinity Manchester ( 3- 6, 84.7) 529 A Stevens ( 0- 7, 78.7)
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
413 H Hopkinton 11-12 -1 -1 -0.20
415 H Pembroke Academy 9- 8 1 4 - -2.61
417 A Bow 7-10 -3 -4 1.27
423 A Hopkinton 7-16 -9 -2 - -3.41
424 H Milford 12- 2 10 4 1.05
507 A Gilford 6- 5 1 0 0.59
508 A ConVal 6- 5 1 -2 + 3.11
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 415 H Pembroke Academy 9- 8 1 4 - -2.61 423 A Hopkinton 7-16 -9 -2 - -3.41 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 508 A ConVal 6- 5 1 -2 + 3.11 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Bow | Bow | ||
| Campbell | Campbell | tied - 1- 2 | Campbell | |
| Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown 3- 0 vs 2- 1 | ||
| Concord | Concord | Concord | ||
| ConVal | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady | ||
| Derryfield | Derryfield | tied - 1- 0 | Derryfield | |
| Dover | Dover | Dover | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady | ||
| Goffstown | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Hanover | Hanover | tied - 1- 0 | Hanover | |
| Hollis-Brookline | Hollis-Brookline | tied - 1- 0 | Hollis-Brookline | |
| Hopkinton | Hopkinton | Hopkinton | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | Inter-Lakes-Moultonb | ||
| John Stark | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady 3- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Kearsarge | Bishop Brady | tied - 1- 2 | Bishop Brady | |
| Keene-Monadnock | Keene-Monadnock | Keene-Monadnock | ||
| Kennett | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady 2- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Kingswood | Kingswood | tied - 1- 0 | Kingswood | |
| Laconia | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Lebanon | Lebanon | Lebanon 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| Londonderry | Londonderry | Londonderry | ||
| Manchester Memorial- | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady | ||
| Merrimack | Merrimack | Merrimack | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady | ||
| Milford | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady | ||
| Nashua North | Nashua North | Nashua North | ||
| Nashua South | Nashua South | Nashua South | ||
| Oyster River-Newmark | Oyster River-Newmark | tied - 1- 0 | Oyster River-Newmark | |
| Pelham | Pelham | tied - 2- 0 | Pelham | |
| Pembroke Academy | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional | Plymouth Regional 3- 0 vs 2- 1 | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | tied - 1- 0 | Portsmouth | |
| Salem | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady | ||
| Souhegan | Bishop Brady | tied - 1- 0 | Bishop Brady | |
| Spaulding | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady 1- 0 vs 0- 1 | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - 1- 0 | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Stevens | Bishop Brady | tied - 0- 2 | Bishop Brady | |
| Timberlane | Timberlane | Timberlane | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Bishop Brady | Bishop Brady 2- 1 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Windham | Windham | Windham | ||
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Hopkinton ( 6- 3, 85.6) 11-12 -14.34 10.06 -0.40 1.34 -19.70
0 H Pembroke Acade ( 1- 9, 81.2) 9- 8 -18.74 5.65 -0.40 1.34 7.03
0 A Bow ( 8- 1, 88.2) 7-10 -11.65 12.74 0.40 1.34 -15.05
0 A Hopkinton ( 6- 3, 85.6) 7-16 -14.34 10.06 0.40 1.34 -18.65
0 H Milford ( 1- 9, 80.8) 12- 2 -19.09 5.31 -0.40 1.34 6.57
0 A Gilford ( 3- 6, 83.6) 6- 5 -16.34 8.06 0.40 1.34 11.30
0 A ConVal ( 5- 4, 86.1) 6- 5 -13.82 10.58 0.40 1.34 14.68
------
-13.82
|