UPDATED: 04-23-26 10:35 PDT

boys Bishop Brady 1
  
Bishop Brady          
W-L: ( 1- 2) PR = 89.5083

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 413 H Hopkinton ( 2- 2, 91.1) 11-12 415 H Pembroke Academy ( 0- 4, 86.8) 9- 8 417 A Bow ( 4- 0, 93.7) 7-10 423 A Hopkinton ( 2- 2, 91.1) 424 H Milford ( 1- 3, 85.9) 506 A Gilford ( 2- 2, 91.2) 508 A ConVal ( 2- 1, 92.2) 513 A Kennett ( 2- 1, 90.2) 516 H Coe-Brown ( 5- 0, 98.7) 518 H Plymouth Regional ( 4- 1, 95.8) 520 H John Stark ( 1- 3, 90.4) 522 H Campbell ( 2- 3, 91.4) 525 A Lebanon ( 1- 1, 93.8) 527 H Trinity Manchester ( 1- 3, 89.4) 528 A Trinity Manchester ( 1- 3, 89.4) 529 A Stevens ( 0- 3, 81.2)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   413 H Hopkinton              11-12      -1    -2           0.51
   415 H Pembroke Academy        9- 8       1     3          -1.77
   417 A Bow                     7-10      -3    -4           1.28

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Bishop Brady PairWisePlus Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alvirne Bishop Brady   Bishop Brady
Bedford Bedford   Bedford
Bishop Guertin Bishop Guertin   Bishop Guertin
Bow Bow Bow  
Campbell Campbell Campbell   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Coe-Brown Coe-Brown Coe-Brown   1- 0 vs 0- 1
Concord Concord   Concord
ConVal ConVal tied -  0- 1 ConVal
Derryfield Derryfield   Derryfield
Dover Dover   Dover
Exeter HS Exeter HS   Exeter HS
Gilford Gilford   Gilford
Goffstown Goffstown   Goffstown
Hanover Hanover   Hanover
Hollis-Brookline Hollis-Brookline tied -  1- 0 Hollis-Brookline
Hopkinton Hopkinton Hopkinton  
Inter-Lakes-Moultonb Inter-Lakes-Moultonb   Inter-Lakes-Moultonb
John Stark John Stark tied -  0- 1 John Stark
Kearsarge Bishop Brady tied -  0- 1 Bishop Brady
Keene-Monadnock Bishop Brady   Bishop Brady
Kennett Kennett   Kennett
Kingswood Kingswood tied -  1- 0 Kingswood
Laconia Laconia   Laconia
Lebanon Lebanon   Lebanon
Londonderry Londonderry   Londonderry
Manchester Memorial- Bishop Brady   Bishop Brady
Merrimack Merrimack   Merrimack
Merrimack Valley Bishop Brady   Bishop Brady
Milford Bishop Brady   Bishop Brady
Nashua North Bishop Brady   Bishop Brady
Nashua South Nashua South   Nashua South
Oyster River-Newmark Oyster River-Newmark   Oyster River-Newmark
Pelham Pelham   Pelham
Pembroke Academy Bishop Brady Bishop Brady  
Pinkerton Academy Pinkerton Academy   Pinkerton Academy
Plymouth Regional Plymouth Regional   Plymouth Regional
Portsmouth Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Salem Bishop Brady   Bishop Brady
Souhegan Souhegan tied -  1- 0 Souhegan
Spaulding Bishop Brady   Bishop Brady
St Thomas Aquinas Bishop Brady   Bishop Brady
Stevens Bishop Brady   Bishop Brady
Timberlane Timberlane   Timberlane
Trinity Manchester Bishop Brady tied -  0- 1 Bishop Brady
Windham Windham   Windham
Winnacunnet Winnacunnet   Winnacunnet

PairWisePlus = 13


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 3.83

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Hopkinton       ( 2- 2, 91.1)    11-12       -8.84       9.89      -0.04         1.28           -11.34
   0 H Pembroke Acade  ( 0- 4, 86.8)     9- 8      -13.12       5.61      -0.04         1.28             7.11
   0 A Bow             ( 4- 0, 93.7)     7-10       -6.16      12.57       0.04         1.28            -7.80
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -12.03

winning pts = 7.1088 losing points = -19.1434

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------