Black Hills LC
W-L: ( 5- 7) PR = 94.6190Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 509 H Bismarck-Mandan LC ( 7- 7, 95.1) 7- 8 509 H Watertown LC ( 0-12, 90.2) 10- 2 510 H Red River Valley LC (15- 0, 99.9) 1-10 516 N Red River Valley LC (15- 0, 99.9) 3-12 516 A Grand Cities LC ( 7- 8, 95.1) 5- 8 517 N Bismarck-Mandan LC ( 7- 7, 95.1) 11- 8 530 A Watertown LC ( 0-12, 90.2) 8- 5 530 N Grand Cities LC ( 7- 8, 95.1) 11- 6 531 N Bismarck-Mandan LC ( 7- 7, 95.1) 9-10 606 A Bismarck-Mandan LC ( 7- 7, 95.1) 6- 7 607 A Watertown LC ( 0-12, 90.2) 9- 2 607 N Grand Cities LC ( 7- 8, 95.1) 10-15
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
509 H Bismarck-Mandan LC 7- 8 -1 0 -0.57
509 H Watertown LC 10- 2 8 4 0.54
510 H Red River Valley LC 1-10 -9 -5 0.00
516 N Red River Valley LC 3-12 -9 -5 0.00
516 A Grand Cities LC 5- 8 -3 -1 - -2.46
517 N Bismarck-Mandan LC 11- 8 3 0 + 3.44
530 A Watertown LC 8- 5 3 4 -1.44
530 N Grand Cities LC 11- 6 5 -1 ++ 5.53
531 N Bismarck-Mandan LC 9-10 -1 0 -0.56
606 A Bismarck-Mandan LC 6- 7 -1 0 -0.55
607 A Watertown LC 9- 2 7 4 0.56
607 N Grand Cities LC 10-15 -5 -1 -- -4.47
|
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 607 N Grand Cities LC 10-15 -5 -1 -- -4.47 516 A Grand Cities LC 5- 8 -3 -1 - -2.46 |
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 530 N Grand Cities LC 11- 6 5 -1 ++ 5.53 517 N Bismarck-Mandan LC 11- 8 3 0 + 3.44 |
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bismarck-Mandan LC | Bismarck-Mandan LC | Bismarck-Mandan LC | ||
| Grand Cities LC | Grand Cities LC | Grand Cities LC | ||
| Red River Valley LC | Red River Valley LC | Red River Valley LC | ||
| Watertown LC | Black Hills LC | Black Hills LC |
division Games Only
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Bismarck-Manda ( 7- 7, 95.1) 7- 8 -4.84 4.89 -0.01 1.13 -5.50
0 H Watertown LC ( 0-12, 90.2) 10- 2 -9.73 1.00 -0.01 1.13 1.12
0 H Red River Vall (15- 0, 99.9) 1-10 -0.00 9.73 -0.01 1.13 -0.01
0 N Red River Vall (15- 0, 99.9) 3-12 -0.00 9.73 -0.00 1.13 -0.00
0 A Grand Cities L ( 7- 8, 95.1) 5- 8 -4.75 4.98 0.01 1.13 -5.38
0 N Bismarck-Manda ( 7- 7, 95.1) 11- 8 -4.84 4.89 -0.00 1.13 5.54
0 A Watertown LC ( 0-12, 90.2) 8- 5 -9.73 1.00 0.01 1.13 1.14
0 N Grand Cities L ( 7- 8, 95.1) 11- 6 -4.75 4.98 -0.00 1.13 5.64
0 N Bismarck-Manda ( 7- 7, 95.1) 9-10 -4.84 4.89 -0.00 1.13 -5.49
0 A Bismarck-Manda ( 7- 7, 95.1) 6- 7 -4.84 4.89 0.01 1.13 -5.48
0 A Watertown LC ( 0-12, 90.2) 9- 2 -9.73 1.00 0.01 1.13 1.14
0 N Grand Cities L ( 7- 8, 95.1) 10-15 -4.75 4.98 -0.00 1.13 -5.39
------
-12.66
|