UPDATED: 04-04-26 09:08 PDT

boys Layton 1
  
Layton                
W-L: ( 1- 5) PR = 77.4346

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 304 A Northridge ( 3- 5, 84.7) 2-16 310 H Clearfield ( 0- 9, 72.7) 10- 2 312 A Sky View ( 5- 1, 88.2) 1-17 317 H Dixie ( 7- 4, 82.2) 4-18 319 A Bingham ( 6- 2, 90.6) 2-16 327 A Viewmont ( 4- 5, 81.6) 5- 9 407 A Weber ( 6- 2, 91.1) 409 H Davis ( 5- 3, 88.1) 414 A Syracuse ( 6- 2, 85.3) 421 H Farmington ( 5- 1, 96.3) 423 H Weber ( 6- 2, 91.1) 428 A Davis ( 5- 3, 88.1) 430 H Syracuse ( 6- 2, 85.3) 507 A Farmington ( 5- 1, 96.3)

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   304 A Northridge              2-16     -14    -8           0.00
   310 H Clearfield             10- 2       8     5           0.02
   312 A Sky View                1-17     -16   -11           0.00
   317 H Dixie                   4-18     -14    -4          -0.53
   319 A Bingham                 2-16     -14   -13           0.00
   327 A Viewmont                5- 9      -4    -4           0.39

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Layton Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alta Alta insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Alta
American Fork American Fork   American Fork
Bear River Bear River tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Bear River
Bingham Bingham Bingham  
Bonneville Layton tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Layton
Bountiful Bountiful Bountiful   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Box Elder Box Elder   Box Elder
Brighton Brighton   Brighton
Canyon View Canyon View tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Canyon View
Cedar Layton tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Layton
Cedar Valley Cedar Valley   Cedar Valley
Clearfield Layton Layton  
Copper Hills Copper Hills insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Copper Hills
Corner Canyon Corner Canyon insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Corner Canyon
Crimson Cliffs Crimson Cliffs   Crimson Cliffs
Davis Davis insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Davis
Desert Hills Layton   Layton
Dixie Dixie Dixie  
East East insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) East
Farmington Farmington insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Farmington
Fremont Fremont tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Fremont
Green Canyon Green Canyon insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Green Canyon
Herriman Herriman   Herriman
Highland Highland   Highland
Hillcrest Layton   Layton
Hurricane Hurricane   Hurricane
Jordan Jordan insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Jordan
Juan Diego Catholic Juan Diego Catholic   Juan Diego Catholic
Judge Memorial Catho Judge Memorial Catho   Judge Memorial Catho
Lehi Lehi insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Lehi
Logan Layton tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Layton
Lone Peak Lone Peak   Lone Peak
Maple Mountain Maple Mountain   Maple Mountain
Mountain Crest Mountain Crest tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Mountain Crest
Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge   Mountain Ridge
Mountain View Layton tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Layton
Northridge Northridge Northridge  
Olympus Olympus   Olympus
Orem Layton   Layton
Park City Park City   Park City
Payson Payson tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Payson
Pine View Layton tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Layton
Pleasant Grove Pleasant Grove   Pleasant Grove
Provo Provo insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Provo
Ridgeline Ridgeline   Ridgeline
Riverton Riverton   Riverton
Roy Roy tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Roy
Salem Hills Salem Hills tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Salem Hills
Sky View Sky View Sky View  
Skyline Skyline   Skyline
Skyridge Skyridge   Skyridge
Snow Canyon Snow Canyon tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Snow Canyon
Spanish Fork Spanish Fork tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Spanish Fork
Springville Springville insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) Springville
Syracuse Syracuse tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Syracuse
Timpanogos Timpanogos   Timpanogos
Timpview Timpview insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Timpview
Viewmont Viewmont Viewmont  
Wasatch Wasatch   Wasatch
Waterford Waterford insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) Waterford
Weber Weber   Weber
West West   West
West Field West Field insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) West Field
West Jordan West Jordan tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) West Jordan
Westlake Westlake   Westlake
Woods Cross Woods Cross tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Woods Cross

PowerWise = 9


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 8.36

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Northridge      ( 3- 5, 84.7)     2-16      -15.18      12.20       0.26         1.39           -20.78
   0 H Clearfield      ( 0- 9, 72.7)    10- 2      -27.19       1.00      -0.26         1.39             1.03
   0 A Sky View        ( 5- 1, 88.2)     1-17      -11.72      15.66       0.26         1.39           -15.96
   0 H Dixie           ( 7- 4, 82.2)     4-18      -17.74       9.65      -0.26         1.39           -25.07
   0 A Bingham         ( 6- 2, 90.6)     2-16       -9.29      18.09       0.26         1.39           -12.58
   0 A Viewmont        ( 4- 5, 81.6)     5- 9      -18.33       9.05       0.26         1.39           -25.18
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       -98.54

winning pts = 1.0272 losing points = -99.5692

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------