Wells
W-L: (14- 2) PR = 94.7485Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 417 A York ( 6-10, 93.5) 9- 5 425 A St Dominic Academy ( 1-12, 82.8) 14- 1 429 A Westbrook ( 6- 8, 88.4) 6- 3 501 A Fryeburg Academy ( 8- 6, 91.2) 11- 1 505 H Bonny Eagle ( 5-10, 89.3) 11- 4 507 H Bonny Eagle ( 5-10, 89.3) 11- 4 508 A Freeport (16- 0, 98.4) 5-14 510 A Lake Region ( 3-11, 88.5) 12- 2 513 H Gorham (10- 5, 95.0) 5- 8 516 H Waynflete School ( 8- 7, 93.1) 7- 5 520 A Sanford ( 8- 7, 92.5) 7- 6 527 H North Yarmouth Academy ( 7- 8, 93.7) 5- 4 529 H Biddeford ( 4-10, 89.5) 11- 4 603 A Traip Academy (10- 5, 93.2) 7- 6 613 N Erskine Academy ( 8- 7, 90.0) 13- 4 617 H Traip Academy (10- 5, 93.2) 10- 4
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
417 A York 9- 5 4 1 + 3.28
425 A St Dominic Academy 14- 1 13 11 0.00
429 A Westbrook 6- 3 3 6 - -2.00
501 A Fryeburg Academy 11- 1 10 3 1.97
505 H Bonny Eagle 11- 4 7 6 0.00
507 H Bonny Eagle 11- 4 7 6 0.00
508 A Freeport 5-14 -9 -4 -0.88
510 A Lake Region 12- 2 10 6 0.00
513 H Gorham 5- 8 -3 0 - -3.26
516 H Waynflete School 7- 5 2 2 -0.21
520 A Sanford 7- 6 1 2 -0.69
527 H North Yarmouth Academy 5- 4 1 2 -0.59
529 H Biddeford 11- 4 7 6 0.00
603 A Traip Academy 7- 6 1 1 -0.01
613 N Erskine Academy 13- 4 9 5 0.29
617 H Traip Academy 10- 4 6 2 + 2.97
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 429 A Westbrook 6- 3 3 6 - -2.00 513 H Gorham 5- 8 -3 0 - -3.26 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 417 A York 9- 5 4 1 + 3.28 617 H Traip Academy 10- 4 6 2 + 2.97 |
Wells Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangor | Wells | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Wells | |
| Biddeford | Wells | Wells | ||
| Bonny Eagle | Wells | Wells | ||
| Brewer/Hampden | Wells | Wells | ||
| Brunswick | Wells | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Wells | |
| Camden Hills Regional | Wells | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Wells | |
| Cape Elizabeth | Wells | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 3) | Wells | |
| Cheverus | Cheverus | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Cheverus | |
| Cony | Wells | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Wells | |
| Deering | Wells | Wells 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Edward Little | Wells | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Wells | |
| Erskine Academy | Wells | Wells | ||
| Falmouth | Falmouth | tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) | Falmouth | |
| Freeport | Freeport | Freeport | ||
| Fryeburg Academy | Wells | Wells | ||
| Gardiner-Hall-Dale | Wells | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Wells | |
| Gorham | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Gray-New Gloucester/Pola | Wells | Wells 10- 0 vs 1- 9 | ||
| Greely | Greely | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) | Greely | |
| Houlton | Wells | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Wells | |
| Kennebunk | Kennebunk | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Kennebunk | |
| Lake Region | Wells | Wells | ||
| Lewiston | Wells | Wells | ||
| Lincoln Academy | Wells | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Wells | |
| Maranacook/Winthrop | Maranacook/Winthrop | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) | Maranacook/Winthrop | |
| Marshwood | Marshwood | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Marshwood | |
| Massabesic | Wells | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Wells | |
| MCI/Nokomis | Wells | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Wells | |
| Messalonskee | Wells | Wells | ||
| Morse-Boothbay | Wells | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Wells | |
| Mount Ararat | Mount Ararat | Mount Ararat | ||
| Mount Blue | Wells | Wells 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Noble | Wells | Wells 5- 1 vs 0- 6 | ||
| North Yarmouth Academy | Wells | Wells | ||
| Oceanside | Wells | Wells | ||
| Oxford Hills Comp | Wells | Wells | ||
| Portland | Wells | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Wells | |
| Sanford | Wells | Wells | ||
| Scarborough | Wells | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Wells | |
| South Portland | Wells | Wells 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| St Dominic Academy | Wells | Wells | ||
| Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Thornton Academy | |
| Traip Academy | Wells | Wells | ||
| Waynflete School | Wells | Wells | ||
| Westbrook | Wells | Wells | ||
| Windham | Windham | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) | Windham | |
| Winslow/Lawrence | Wells | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Wells | |
| Yarmouth | Yarmouth | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Yarmouth | |
| York | Wells | Wells |
PowerWise = 37
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 14.76
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A York ( 6-10, 93.5) 9- 5 -6.39 12.36 0.51 0.98 12.67
0 A St Dominic Aca ( 1-12, 82.8) 14- 1 -17.05 1.69 0.51 0.98 2.17
0 A Westbrook ( 6- 8, 88.4) 6- 3 -11.53 7.21 0.51 0.98 7.60
0 A Fryeburg Acade ( 8- 6, 91.2) 11- 1 -8.70 10.05 0.51 0.98 10.39
0 H Bonny Eagle ( 5-10, 89.3) 11- 4 -10.59 8.16 -0.51 0.98 7.52
0 H Bonny Eagle ( 5-10, 89.3) 11- 4 -10.59 8.16 -0.51 0.98 7.52
0 A Freeport (16- 0, 98.4) 5-14 -1.54 17.21 0.51 0.98 -1.01
0 A Lake Region ( 3-11, 88.5) 12- 2 -11.37 7.38 0.51 0.98 7.77
0 H Gorham (10- 5, 95.0) 5- 8 -4.90 13.85 -0.51 0.98 -5.33
0 H Waynflete Scho ( 8- 7, 93.1) 7- 5 -6.84 11.90 -0.51 0.98 11.21
0 A Sanford ( 8- 7, 92.5) 7- 6 -7.35 11.39 0.51 0.98 11.72
0 H North Yarmouth ( 7- 8, 93.7) 5- 4 -6.23 12.52 -0.51 0.98 11.81
0 H Biddeford ( 4-10, 89.5) 11- 4 -10.39 8.36 -0.51 0.98 7.72
0 A Traip Academy (10- 5, 93.2) 7- 6 -6.67 12.07 0.51 0.98 12.39
0 N Erskine Academ ( 8- 7, 90.0) 13- 4 -9.86 8.89 -0.00 0.98 8.74
0 H Traip Academy (10- 5, 93.2) 10- 4 -6.67 12.07 -0.51 0.98 11.38
------
124.27
|
winning pts = 130.6087 losing points = -6.3387
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------