Truckee-North Tahoe
W-L: (16- 1) PR = 97.9471Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 311 A McQueen ( 4-11, 86.3) 14- 1 327 A Spanish Springs ( 6- 8, 89.4) 15- 4 329 A Oasis Academy/Fallon ( 8- 8, 90.2) 22- 3 403 A Reno ( 5-12, 86.0) 16- 1 405 H Bishop Manogue (11- 4, 94.9) 12- 5 408 A Damonte Ranch ( 1-13, 85.1) 15- 2 410 H McQueen ( 4-11, 86.3) 16- 2 421 A Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 7- 8 423 A Bishop Manogue (11- 4, 94.9) 12- 9 425 H Damonte Ranch ( 1-13, 85.1) 1- 0 430 H Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 9- 7 501 H Reno ( 5-12, 86.0) 16- 4 503 H Oasis Academy/Fallon ( 8- 8, 90.2) 19- 5 507 H Spanish Springs ( 6- 8, 89.4) 16- 4 512 H Oasis Academy/Fallon ( 8- 8, 90.2) 20- 3 514 H Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 9- 8 517 A Palo Verde (12- 1, 99.9) 8- 7
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
311 A McQueen 14- 1 13 11 0.00
327 A Spanish Springs 15- 4 11 8 0.00
329 A Oasis Academy/Fallon 22- 3 19 7 0.00
403 A Reno 16- 1 15 12 0.00
405 H Bishop Manogue 12- 5 7 3 1.67
408 A Damonte Ranch 15- 2 13 12 0.00
410 H McQueen 16- 2 14 12 0.00
421 A Galena 7- 8 -1 2 - -2.98
423 A Bishop Manogue 12- 9 3 3 0.31
430 H Galena 9- 7 2 3 -0.62
501 H Reno 16- 4 12 12 0.00
503 H Oasis Academy/Fallon 19- 5 14 8 0.00
507 H Spanish Springs 16- 4 12 9 0.00
512 H Oasis Academy/Fallon 20- 3 17 8 0.00
514 H Galena 9- 8 1 3 -1.62
517 A Palo Verde 8- 7 1 -2 + 3.27
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 421 A Galena 7- 8 -1 2 - -2.98 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 517 A Palo Verde 8- 7 1 -2 + 3.27 |
Truckee-North Tahoe Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bishop Gorman | Truckee-North Tahoe | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) | Truckee-North Tahoe | |
| Bishop Gorman II | Truckee-North Tahoe | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Truckee-North Tahoe | |
| Bishop Manogue | Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe | ||
| Centennial | Centennial | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 0) | Centennial | |
| Coronado | Truckee-North Tahoe | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 1) | Truckee-North Tahoe | |
| Damonte Ranch | Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe | ||
| Faith Lutheran | Truckee-North Tahoe | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Truckee-North Tahoe | |
| Galena | Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe | ||
| McQueen | Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe | ||
| Oasis Academy/Fallon | Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe | ||
| One Hill | Truckee-North Tahoe | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Truckee-North Tahoe | |
| Palo Verde | Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe | ||
| Reed | Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Reno | Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe | ||
| Spanish Springs | Truckee-North Tahoe | Truckee-North Tahoe |
PowerWise = 14
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.62
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A McQueen ( 4-11, 86.3) 14- 1 -13.56 2.69 0.32 0.80 2.41
0 A Spanish Spring ( 6- 8, 89.4) 15- 4 -10.46 5.79 0.32 0.80 4.90
0 A Oasis Academy/ ( 8- 8, 90.2) 22- 3 -9.72 6.53 0.32 0.80 5.49
0 A Reno ( 5-12, 86.0) 16- 1 -13.85 2.40 0.32 0.80 2.18
0 H Bishop Manogue (11- 4, 94.9) 12- 5 -4.96 11.29 -0.32 0.80 8.79
0 A Damonte Ranch ( 1-13, 85.1) 15- 2 -14.76 1.49 0.32 0.80 1.45
0 H McQueen ( 4-11, 86.3) 16- 2 -13.56 2.69 -0.32 0.80 1.90
0 A Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 7- 8 -4.26 12.00 0.32 0.80 -3.15
0 A Bishop Manogue (11- 4, 94.9) 12- 9 -4.96 11.29 0.32 0.80 9.31
0 H Damonte Ranch ( 1-13, 85.1) 1- 0 -14.76 1.49 -0.32 0.80 0.94
0 H Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 9- 7 -4.26 12.00 -0.32 0.80 9.36
0 H Reno ( 5-12, 86.0) 16- 4 -13.85 2.40 -0.32 0.80 1.67
0 H Oasis Academy/ ( 8- 8, 90.2) 19- 5 -9.72 6.53 -0.32 0.80 4.98
0 H Spanish Spring ( 6- 8, 89.4) 16- 4 -10.46 5.79 -0.32 0.80 4.38
0 H Oasis Academy/ ( 8- 8, 90.2) 20- 3 -9.72 6.53 -0.32 0.80 4.98
0 H Galena (13- 6, 95.6) 9- 8 -4.26 12.00 -0.32 0.80 9.36
0 A Palo Verde (12- 1, 99.9) 8- 7 -0.00 16.25 0.32 0.80 13.28
------
82.25
|
winning pts = 85.4027 losing points = -3.1533
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------