Tower Hill School
W-L: (17- 1) PR = 96.1581Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 401 A St Marks (11- 5, 87.6) 18- 3 403 A Sanford School ( 9- 9, 89.3) 20- 2 408 H Tatnall School (10- 5, 93.1) 9- 7 410 A Wilmington Friends (12- 5, 91.4) 14- 9 415 H St Andrews ( 8- 8, 87.8) 23- 8 417 H Sussex Academy (10- 6, 91.4) 11- 7 422 H Sanford School ( 9- 9, 89.3) 19- 4 424 A Archmere Academy (10- 5, 91.5) 11- 8 429 A Tatnall School (10- 5, 93.1) 16-11 501 H Wilmington Friends (12- 5, 91.4) 17- 3 502 H Caravel Academy (10- 4, 90.3) 11- 4 506 A St Andrews ( 8- 8, 87.8) 18- 8 508 A Wilmington Charter ( 5-10, 81.6) 23- 1 513 A Padua Academy ( 4-11, 82.4) 17- 3 514 H Concord ( 9- 7, 83.2) 21- 3 521 H Tatnall School (10- 5, 93.1) 14- 6 529 H Caesar Rodney (12- 2, 95.7) 12-11 531 N Cape Henlopen (11- 0, 99.9) 9-20
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
401 A St Marks 18- 3 15 8 0.00
403 A Sanford School 20- 2 18 7 0.00
408 H Tatnall School 9- 7 2 3 -1.11
410 A Wilmington Friends 14- 9 5 5 0.26
415 H St Andrews 23- 8 15 8 0.00
417 H Sussex Academy 11- 7 4 5 -0.78
422 H Sanford School 19- 4 15 7 0.00
424 A Archmere Academy 11- 8 3 5 -1.56
429 A Tatnall School 16-11 5 3 2.00
501 H Wilmington Friends 17- 3 14 5 0.15
502 H Caravel Academy 11- 4 7 6 0.00
506 A St Andrews 18- 8 10 8 0.00
508 A Wilmington Charter 23- 1 22 14 0.00
513 A Padua Academy 17- 3 14 14 0.00
514 H Concord 21- 3 18 13 0.00
521 H Tatnall School 14- 6 8 3 1.89
529 H Caesar Rodney 12-11 1 0 0.51
531 N Cape Henlopen 9-20 -11 -4 -1.26
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Tower Hill School Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glasglow | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Appoquinimink | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Archmere Academy | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Brandywine | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Caesar Rodney | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | ||
| Caravel Academy | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Christiana | Tower Hill School | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Tower Hill School | |
| Concord | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Conrad School | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Delaware Military Academ | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Dover | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 4- 1 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Hodgson Vo-Tech | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Indian River | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Lake Forest | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Middletown | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Milford | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 6- 1 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Mt Pleasant | Tower Hill School | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Tower Hill School | |
| Newark | Tower Hill School | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Tower Hill School | |
| Newark Charter School | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 7- 0 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Odessa | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Padua Academy | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Polytech | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 6- 1 vs 0- 7 | ||
| Sanford School | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Smyrna | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 6- 1 vs 3- 4 | ||
| St Andrews | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| St Georges Tech | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| St Marks | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Sussex Academy | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Sussex Tech | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Tatnall School | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Ursuline Academy | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School 10- 0 vs 2- 8 | ||
| Wilmington Charter | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Wilmington Friends | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School |
PowerWise = 33
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.83
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A St Marks (11- 5, 87.6) 18- 3 -12.26 21.34 0.05 0.77 16.44
0 A Sanford School ( 9- 9, 89.3) 20- 2 -10.65 22.96 0.05 0.77 17.68
0 H Tatnall School (10- 5, 93.1) 9- 7 -6.80 26.81 -0.05 0.77 20.55
0 A Wilmington Fri (12- 5, 91.4) 14- 9 -8.53 25.07 0.05 0.77 19.30
0 H St Andrews ( 8- 8, 87.8) 23- 8 -12.13 21.48 -0.05 0.77 16.46
0 H Sussex Academy (10- 6, 91.4) 11- 7 -8.47 25.14 -0.05 0.77 19.27
0 H Sanford School ( 9- 9, 89.3) 19- 4 -10.65 22.96 -0.05 0.77 17.59
0 A Archmere Acade (10- 5, 91.5) 11- 8 -8.36 25.25 0.05 0.77 19.44
0 A Tatnall School (10- 5, 93.1) 16-11 -6.80 26.81 0.05 0.77 20.64
0 H Wilmington Fri (12- 5, 91.4) 17- 3 -8.53 25.07 -0.05 0.77 19.22
0 H Caravel Academ (10- 4, 90.3) 11- 4 -9.61 24.00 -0.05 0.77 18.40
0 A St Andrews ( 8- 8, 87.8) 18- 8 -12.13 21.48 0.05 0.77 16.54
0 A Wilmington Cha ( 5-10, 81.6) 23- 1 -18.28 15.32 0.05 0.77 11.81
0 A Padua Academy ( 4-11, 82.4) 17- 3 -17.54 16.06 0.05 0.77 12.38
0 H Concord ( 9- 7, 83.2) 21- 3 -16.70 16.90 -0.05 0.77 12.94
0 H Tatnall School (10- 5, 93.1) 14- 6 -6.80 26.81 -0.05 0.77 20.55
0 H Caesar Rodney (12- 2, 95.7) 12-11 -4.18 29.43 -0.05 0.77 22.57
0 N Cape Henlopen (11- 0, 99.9) 9-20 -0.00 33.61 -0.00 0.77 -0.00
------
301.79
|
winning pts = 301.7928 losing points = 0.0000
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------