All ratings/rankings on this page are based on the state (not league) championships.
Conf =
Nickname = Coach =GAME LIST
Team Power Rating = 65.7600021 home-field advantage = -0.42 Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 309 A Clearfield ( 6-12, 64.1) 6- 5 309 A Westlake ( 8-10, 65.2) 6- 4 309 H Springville ( 4-13, 62.5) 9- 3 314 A Spanish Fork ( 1-16, 58.9) 6- 4 320 A Cedar Valley (10- 5, 66.2) 7-11 326 H Springville ( 4-13, 62.5) 14- 4 328 H Uintah ( 4-12, 55.6) 11- 3 411 A Payson (18- 2, 69.3) 8-13 415 H Orem ( 3-13, 55.8) 16- 5 418 H Mountain View ( 1-12, 51.7) 14- 1 422 A Provo ( 9- 9, 63.1) 6- 5 425 A Uintah ( 4-12, 55.6) 15- 4 429 H Payson (18- 2, 69.3) 7- 8 502 A Orem ( 3-13, 55.8) 14- 4 506 A Mountain View ( 1-12, 51.7) 15- 1 509 H Provo ( 9- 9, 63.1) 9- 5 516 H Mountain View ( 1-12, 51.7) 14- 3 518 A Sky View ( 8- 6, 63.7) 5- 4 521 H Payson (18- 2, 69.3) 9-12
PREDICTION LIST
------------------------------------- |Real = actual goal margin | |Pred = predicted goal margin | |+ = slightly above prediction | |++ = above prediction | |+++ = well above prediction | |- = slightly below prediction | |-- = below prediction | |--- = well below prediction | |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) | | prediction. N/A when ten | | goal limit is exceeded | |n/a = Outside division | ------------------------------------- Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 309 A Clearfield 6- 5 1 1 -0.21 309 A Westlake 6- 4 2 0 1.84 309 H Springville 9- 3 6 3 + 2.34 314 A Spanish Fork 6- 4 2 6 -- -4.44 320 A Cedar Valley 7-11 -4 0 - -3.13 326 H Springville 14- 4 10 3 + 3.34 328 H Uintah 11- 3 8 10 0.00 411 A Payson 8-13 -5 -3 -1.07 415 H Orem 16- 5 11 10 0.00 418 H Mountain View 14- 1 13 14 0.00 422 A Provo 6- 5 1 2 -1.24 425 A Uintah 15- 4 11 9 0.00 429 H Payson 7- 8 -1 -3 + 2.09 502 A Orem 14- 4 10 9 0.00 506 A Mountain View 15- 1 14 13 0.00 509 H Provo 9- 5 4 3 0.92 516 H Mountain View 14- 3 11 14 0.00 518 A Sky View 5- 4 1 1 -0.67 521 H Payson 9-12 -3 -3 0.09UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 314 A Spanish Fork 6- 4 2 6 -- -4.44 320 A Cedar Valley 7-11 -4 0 - -3.13OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 309 H Springville 9- 3 6 3 + 2.34 326 H Springville 14- 4 10 3 + 3.34 429 H Payson 7- 8 -1 -3 + 2.09
RATING BASED ON POWER RATING Power Rating............. 65.76 Power Rank................. 37 SOS (PR) Rating.......... 29.33 SOS (PR) Rank.............. 64 SOS (RPI) Rating......... .5584 SOS (RPI) Rank............. 51 RPI Rating............... .5175 RPI Rank................... 28 Champ. Probability ...... 0.0 Championship Rank ......... 59 Selection sum ........... 97 Selection Rank ............ 32 Qual Win (PR) Rating..... -25. Qual Win (PR) Rank......... 26 Qual Win (RPI) Rating.... 5. Qual Win (RPI) Rank........ 18 PERFORMANCE BASED ON POWER RATING Ave Offensive Goals ..... 10.1 Ave Defensive Goals ....... 5.2 Wins/Losses(all )...... 15- 4 Ave Goal diff (all )..... 4.8 Wins/Losses(top 5)...... 0- 0 Ave Goal diff (top 5)..... Wins/Losses(top 10)...... 0- 0 Ave Goal diff (top 10)..... Wins/Losses(2nd 10)...... 0- 0 Ave Goal diff (top 20)..... Wins/Losses(last 3)...... 2- 1 Ave Goal diff (last 3)..... 3.0