---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 22:51 PDT

safe3step girls Timberlane 1
  
Timberlane            
W-L: (10- 6) PR = 89.7463

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 416 H Kingswood ( 6-10, 83.8) 12- 2 417 A Kennett ( 5- 9, 83.9) 15- 6 421 H Hanover (11- 8, 90.6) 15-17 423 A Merrimack (14- 2, 91.0) 13-14 430 A Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 9-10 505 A Spaulding ( 2-14, 78.6) 18- 1 507 H Oyster River-Newmarket ( 9- 7, 87.7) 13-10 508 A Winnacunnet (19- 1, 95.7) 5-17 514 H Goffstown ( 6-11, 87.0) 16- 9 516 A Alvirne ( 1-14, 76.4) 16- 5 519 H Keene-Monadnock ( 3- 9, 79.3) 18- 3 520 H Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 15- 6 523 A Merrimack Valley (12- 5, 90.1) 8- 5 527 H Manchester Memorial ( 1-15, 76.5) 16- 3 530 A Hollis-Brookline ( 8-10, 88.5) 7- 8 605 H Hanover (11- 8, 90.6) 7-13

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   416 H Kingswood              12- 2      10     6           0.00
   417 A Kennett                15- 6       9     6           0.00
   421 H Hanover                15-17      -2    -1          -1.29
   423 A Merrimack              13-14      -1    -1           0.36
   430 A Dover                   9-10      -1     1    -     -2.07
   505 A Spaulding              18- 1      17    11           0.00
   507 H Oyster River-Newmarket 13-10       3     2           0.80
   508 A Winnacunnet             5-17     -12    -6           0.00
   514 H Goffstown              16- 9       7     3    +      2.11
   516 A Alvirne                16- 5      11    13           0.00
   519 H Keene-Monadnock        18- 3      15    11           0.00
   520 H Salem                  15- 6       9     2    +      3.17
   523 A Merrimack Valley        8- 5       3     0    +      3.47
   527 H Manchester Memorial    16- 3      13    13           0.00
   530 A Hollis-Brookline        7- 8      -1     1    -     -2.13
   605 H Hanover                 7-13      -6    -1    --    -4.29

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   605 H Hanover                 7-13      -6    -1    --    -4.29
   430 A Dover                   9-10      -1     1    -     -2.07
   530 A Hollis-Brookline        7- 8      -1     1    -     -2.13

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   514 H Goffstown              16- 9       7     3    +      2.11
   520 H Salem                  15- 6       9     2    +      3.17
   523 A Merrimack Valley        8- 5       3     0    +      3.47

Timberlane Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alvirne Timberlane Timberlane  
Bedford Bedford Bedford   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Belmont Timberlane   Timberlane
Bishop Brady Timberlane   Timberlane
Bishop Guertin Bishop Guertin insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Bishop Guertin
Bow Bow   Bow
Campbell Timberlane   Timberlane
Coe-Brown Timberlane   Timberlane
Concord Timberlane insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Timberlane
Concord Christian Timberlane   Timberlane
ConVal Timberlane tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Timberlane
Derryfield Derryfield   Derryfield
Dover Dover Dover  
Exeter HS Exeter HS Exeter HS   4- 1 vs 2- 3
Gilford Gilford   Gilford
Goffstown Timberlane Timberlane  
Hanover Hanover Hanover  
Hollis-Brookline Hollis-Brookline Hollis-Brookline  
Hopkinton Hopkinton   Hopkinton
Inter-Lakes-Moultonborou Timberlane   Timberlane
John Stark Timberlane   Timberlane
Kearsarge Timberlane   Timberlane
Keene-Monadnock Timberlane Timberlane  
Kennett Timberlane Timberlane  
Kingswood Timberlane Timberlane  
Laconia Timberlane   Timberlane
Lebanon Timberlane   Timberlane
Londonderry Londonderry insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) Londonderry
Manchester Central-West Timberlane insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Timberlane
Manchester Memorial Timberlane Timberlane  
Merrimack Merrimack Merrimack  
Merrimack Valley Timberlane Timberlane  
Milford Timberlane   Timberlane
Nashua North Timberlane insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Timberlane
Nashua South Nashua South Nashua South   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Oyster River-Newmarket Timberlane Timberlane  
Pelham Timberlane   Timberlane
Pembroke Academy Timberlane   Timberlane
Pinkerton Academy Pinkerton Academy Pinkerton Academy   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Plymouth Timberlane   Timberlane
Portsmouth Portsmouth Portsmouth   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Salem Timberlane Timberlane  
Souhegan Souhegan insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Souhegan
Spaulding Timberlane Timberlane  
St Thomas Aquinas St Thomas Aquinas   St Thomas Aquinas
Trinity Manchester Timberlane   Timberlane
Windham Windham Windham   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Winnacunnet Winnacunnet Winnacunnet  

PowerWise = 29


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 15.96

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Kingswood       ( 6-10, 83.8)    12- 2      -16.12      11.81      -0.16         1.00            11.62
   0 A Kennett         ( 5- 9, 83.9)    15- 6      -16.04      11.89       0.16         1.00            12.02
   0 H Hanover         (11- 8, 90.6)    15-17       -9.29      18.64      -0.16         1.00            -9.42
   0 A Merrimack       (14- 2, 91.0)    13-14       -8.95      18.98       0.16         1.00            -8.77
   0 A Dover           ( 7- 9, 88.5)     9-10      -11.38      16.55       0.16         1.00           -11.19
   0 A Spaulding       ( 2-14, 78.6)    18- 1      -21.26       6.66       0.16         1.00             6.80
   0 H Oyster River-N  ( 9- 7, 87.7)    13-10      -12.20      15.73      -0.16         1.00            15.53
   0 A Winnacunnet     (19- 1, 95.7)     5-17       -4.17      23.76       0.16         1.00            -4.00
   0 H Goffstown       ( 6-11, 87.0)    16- 9      -12.89      15.04      -0.16         1.00            14.85
   0 A Alvirne         ( 1-14, 76.4)    16- 5      -23.49       4.44       0.16         1.00             4.58
   0 H Keene-Monadnoc  ( 3- 9, 79.3)    18- 3      -20.65       7.28      -0.16         1.00             7.11
   0 H Salem           ( 5-13, 88.1)    15- 6      -11.83      16.10      -0.16         1.00            15.90
   0 A Merrimack Vall  (12- 5, 90.1)     8- 5       -9.84      18.09       0.16         1.00            18.20
   0 H Manchester Mem  ( 1-15, 76.5)    16- 3      -23.43       4.50      -0.16         1.00             4.33
   0 A Hollis-Brookli  ( 8-10, 88.5)     7- 8      -11.44      16.49       0.16         1.00           -11.25
   0 H Hanover         (11- 8, 90.6)     7-13       -9.29      18.64      -0.16         1.00            -9.42
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        56.88

winning pts = 110.9318 losing points = -54.0476

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------