Thornton Academy
W-L: ( 9- 7) PR = 95.7440Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 418 H Falmouth (12- 5, 95.9) 9-10 422 A Lewiston ( 1-13, 86.7) 20- 1 424 A Cheverus (12- 5, 95.0) 14- 9 429 H Oxford Hills Comp ( 5-11, 89.2) 22- 0 502 H Massabesic ( 8- 7, 93.9) 10- 7 506 A Portland ( 3-11, 87.9) 15- 5 510 A Cape Elizabeth ( 8- 9, 94.5) 15-16 513 H Scarborough ( 7- 8, 93.2) 16- 6 516 H Sanford ( 8- 7, 92.5) 11- 5 519 H Windham (15- 3, 97.3) 7-11 522 A Yarmouth ( 9- 7, 95.0) 12-13 530 A Biddeford ( 4-10, 89.5) 16- 5 603 A Marshwood (11- 5, 96.3) 11-13 605 H Kennebunk (16- 0, 99.9) 11-14 611 N Scarborough ( 7- 8, 93.2) 7- 5 614 H Kennebunk (16- 0, 99.9) 7-11
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
418 H Falmouth 9-10 -1 0 -1.39
422 A Lewiston 20- 1 19 9 0.00
424 A Cheverus 14- 9 5 0 ++ 4.77
429 H Oxford Hills Comp 22- 0 22 7 0.00
502 H Massabesic 10- 7 3 2 0.67
506 A Portland 15- 5 10 7 0.00
510 A Cape Elizabeth 15-16 -1 1 -1.75
513 H Scarborough 16- 6 10 3 1.91
516 H Sanford 11- 5 6 4 1.29
519 H Windham 7-11 -4 -1 - -2.98
522 A Yarmouth 12-13 -1 0 -1.26
530 A Biddeford 16- 5 11 6 0.00
603 A Marshwood 11-13 -2 -1 -0.97
605 H Kennebunk 11-14 -3 -4 0.64
611 N Scarborough 7- 5 2 3 -0.57
614 H Kennebunk 7-11 -4 -4 -0.36
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 519 H Windham 7-11 -4 -1 - -2.98 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 424 A Cheverus 14- 9 5 0 ++ 4.77 |
Thornton Academy Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangor | Thornton Academy | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Thornton Academy | |
| Biddeford | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Bonny Eagle | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy 4- 1 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Brewer/Hampden | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Thornton Academy | |
| Brunswick | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Camden Hills Regional | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Thornton Academy | |
| Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | Cape Elizabeth | ||
| Cheverus | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Cony | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Thornton Academy | |
| Deering | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy 4- 1 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Edward Little | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Erskine Academy | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Falmouth | Falmouth | Falmouth | ||
| Freeport | Freeport | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Freeport | |
| Fryeburg Academy | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Thornton Academy | |
| Gardiner-Hall-Dale | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Thornton Academy | |
| Gorham | Thornton Academy | insuffient: ( 4- 5)( 5- 4) | Thornton Academy | |
| Gray-New Gloucester/Pola | Thornton Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Thornton Academy | |
| Greely | Greely | Greely 2- 3 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Houlton | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Kennebunk | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Lake Region | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Thornton Academy | |
| Lewiston | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Lincoln Academy | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Maranacook/Winthrop | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Thornton Academy | |
| Marshwood | Marshwood | Marshwood | ||
| Massabesic | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| MCI/Nokomis | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Messalonskee | Thornton Academy | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Thornton Academy | |
| Morse-Boothbay | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Mount Ararat | Mount Ararat | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Mount Ararat | |
| Mount Blue | Thornton Academy | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Thornton Academy | |
| Noble | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| North Yarmouth Academy | Thornton Academy | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Thornton Academy | |
| Oceanside | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Oxford Hills Comp | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Portland | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Sanford | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Scarborough | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| South Portland | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy 6- 1 vs 2- 5 | ||
| St Dominic Academy | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Thornton Academy | |
| Traip Academy | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Thornton Academy | |
| Waynflete School | Thornton Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Thornton Academy | |
| Wells | Thornton Academy | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Thornton Academy | |
| Westbrook | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Windham | Windham | Windham | ||
| Winslow/Lawrence | Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | ||
| Yarmouth | Yarmouth | Yarmouth | ||
| York | Thornton Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 4)( 0- 5) | Thornton Academy |
PowerWise = 40
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 14.76
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Falmouth (12- 5, 95.9) 9-10 -4.04 14.71 -0.51 0.92 -4.20
0 A Lewiston ( 1-13, 86.7) 20- 1 -13.22 5.53 0.51 0.92 5.58
0 A Cheverus (12- 5, 95.0) 14- 9 -4.90 13.84 0.51 0.92 13.24
0 H Oxford Hills C ( 5-11, 89.2) 22- 0 -10.72 8.02 -0.51 0.92 6.93
0 H Massabesic ( 8- 7, 93.9) 10- 7 -5.97 12.78 -0.51 0.92 11.31
0 A Portland ( 3-11, 87.9) 15- 5 -11.97 6.78 0.51 0.92 6.73
0 A Cape Elizabeth ( 8- 9, 94.5) 15-16 -5.42 13.33 0.51 0.92 -4.52
0 H Scarborough ( 7- 8, 93.2) 16- 6 -6.73 12.02 -0.51 0.92 10.61
0 H Sanford ( 8- 7, 92.5) 11- 5 -7.35 11.39 -0.51 0.92 10.04
0 H Windham (15- 3, 97.3) 7-11 -2.62 16.13 -0.51 0.92 -2.89
0 A Yarmouth ( 9- 7, 95.0) 12-13 -4.93 13.82 0.51 0.92 -4.07
0 A Biddeford ( 4-10, 89.5) 16- 5 -10.39 8.36 0.51 0.92 8.18
0 A Marshwood (11- 5, 96.3) 11-13 -3.64 15.11 0.51 0.92 -2.88
0 H Kennebunk (16- 0, 99.9) 11-14 -0.00 18.75 -0.51 0.92 -0.47
0 N Scarborough ( 7- 8, 93.2) 7- 5 -6.73 12.02 -0.00 0.92 11.09
0 H Kennebunk (16- 0, 99.9) 7-11 -0.00 18.75 -0.51 0.92 -0.47
------
64.19
|
winning pts = 83.7067 losing points = -19.5196
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------