Tatnall School
W-L: (10- 5) PR = 93.1029Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 331 A Caesar Rodney (12- 2, 95.7) 10-12 408 A Tower Hill School (17- 1, 96.2) 7- 9 410 A St Andrews ( 8- 8, 87.8) 11- 5 412 A Sussex Academy (10- 6, 91.4) 8- 9 414 H Wilmington Charter ( 5-10, 81.6) 19- 3 417 A Sanford School ( 9- 9, 89.3) 14- 3 423 A Wilmington Friends (12- 5, 91.4) 15- 6 429 H Tower Hill School (17- 1, 96.2) 11-16 501 H St Andrews ( 8- 8, 87.8) 19- 4 505 H Newark Charter School ( 6- 9, 82.4) 22- 6 507 H Ursuline Academy ( 4- 9, 84.0) 19- 4 509 H Sanford School ( 9- 9, 89.3) 17- 8 514 H Wilmington Friends (12- 5, 91.4) 11-10 519 H St Andrews ( 8- 8, 87.8) 18- 8 521 A Tower Hill School (17- 1, 96.2) 6-14
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
331 A Caesar Rodney 10-12 -2 -3 0.67
408 A Tower Hill School 7- 9 -2 -3 1.11
410 A St Andrews 11- 5 6 5 0.00
412 A Sussex Academy 8- 9 -1 2 - -2.62
414 H Wilmington Charter 19- 3 16 12 0.00
417 A Sanford School 14- 3 11 4 1.20
423 A Wilmington Friends 15- 6 9 2 + 3.32
429 H Tower Hill School 11-16 -5 -3 -2.00
501 H St Andrews 19- 4 15 5 0.00
505 H Newark Charter School 22- 6 16 11 0.00
507 H Ursuline Academy 19- 4 15 9 0.00
509 H Sanford School 17- 8 9 4 1.09
514 H Wilmington Friends 11-10 1 2 -0.79
519 H St Andrews 18- 8 10 5 0.00
521 A Tower Hill School 6-14 -8 -3 -1.89
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 412 A Sussex Academy 8- 9 -1 2 - -2.62 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 423 A Wilmington Friends 15- 6 9 2 + 3.32 |
Tatnall School Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glasglow | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| Appoquinimink | Tatnall School | Tatnall School 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Archmere Academy | Tatnall School | tied - ( 4- 3) ( 4- 3) | Tatnall School | |
| Brandywine | Tatnall School | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Tatnall School | |
| Caesar Rodney | Caesar Rodney | Caesar Rodney | ||
| Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen | Cape Henlopen 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Caravel Academy | Tatnall School | tied - ( 4- 2) ( 4- 2) | Tatnall School | |
| Christiana | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| Concord | Tatnall School | Tatnall School 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Conrad School | Tatnall School | Tatnall School 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Delaware Military Academ | Tatnall School | Tatnall School 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Dover | Tatnall School | Tatnall School 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Hodgson Vo-Tech | Tatnall School | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Tatnall School | |
| Indian River | Tatnall School | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Tatnall School | |
| Lake Forest | Tatnall School | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Tatnall School | |
| Middletown | Tatnall School | Tatnall School 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Milford | Tatnall School | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | Tatnall School | |
| Mt Pleasant | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| Newark | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| Newark Charter School | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| Odessa | Tatnall School | Tatnall School 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Padua Academy | Tatnall School | Tatnall School 6- 1 vs 1- 6 | ||
| Polytech | Tatnall School | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Tatnall School | |
| Sanford School | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| Smyrna | Tatnall School | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Tatnall School | |
| St Andrews | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| St Georges Tech | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| St Marks | Tatnall School | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | Tatnall School | |
| Sussex Academy | Sussex Academy | Sussex Academy | ||
| Sussex Tech | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | Tower Hill School | ||
| Ursuline Academy | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| Wilmington Charter | Tatnall School | Tatnall School | ||
| Wilmington Friends | Tatnall School | Tatnall School |
PowerWise = 30
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.83
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Caesar Rodney (12- 2, 95.7) 10-12 -4.18 29.43 0.05 0.92 -3.80
0 A Tower Hill Sch (17- 1, 96.2) 7- 9 -3.74 29.86 0.05 0.92 -3.40
0 A St Andrews ( 8- 8, 87.8) 11- 5 -12.13 21.48 0.05 0.92 19.85
0 A Sussex Academy (10- 6, 91.4) 8- 9 -8.47 25.14 0.05 0.92 -7.76
0 H Wilmington Cha ( 5-10, 81.6) 19- 3 -18.28 15.32 -0.05 0.92 14.08
0 A Sanford School ( 9- 9, 89.3) 14- 3 -10.65 22.96 0.05 0.92 21.21
0 A Wilmington Fri (12- 5, 91.4) 15- 6 -8.53 25.07 0.05 0.92 23.16
0 H Tower Hill Sch (17- 1, 96.2) 11-16 -3.74 29.86 -0.05 0.92 -3.50
0 H St Andrews ( 8- 8, 87.8) 19- 4 -12.13 21.48 -0.05 0.92 19.75
0 H Newark Charter ( 6- 9, 82.4) 22- 6 -17.50 16.11 -0.05 0.92 14.80
0 H Ursuline Acade ( 4- 9, 84.0) 19- 4 -15.85 17.75 -0.05 0.92 16.32
0 H Sanford School ( 9- 9, 89.3) 17- 8 -10.65 22.96 -0.05 0.92 21.11
0 H Wilmington Fri (12- 5, 91.4) 11-10 -8.53 25.07 -0.05 0.92 23.06
0 H St Andrews ( 8- 8, 87.8) 18- 8 -12.13 21.48 -0.05 0.92 19.75
0 A Tower Hill Sch (17- 1, 96.2) 6-14 -3.74 29.86 0.05 0.92 -3.40
------
171.24
|
winning pts = 193.0981 losing points = -21.8579
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------