St Thomas Aquinas
W-L: (17- 1) PR = 95.8163Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 416 A Hopkinton (15- 3, 91.5) 19-13 421 A Laconia (11- 5, 87.9) 22- 3 423 H Bow (14- 4, 91.1) 16- 8 425 H Kearsarge ( 7- 8, 82.9) 20- 3 429 A Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 7-21 501 H Derryfield (13- 5, 90.9) 17-14 508 A Bishop Brady ( 3- 9, 82.5) 19- 3 509 A Pelham ( 7- 8, 85.7) 22- 8 512 H John Stark (13- 3, 87.7) 18- 3 514 A Gilford (13- 3, 93.5) 11- 9 519 H Concord Christian ( 2-12, 79.1) 20- 6 520 A Lebanon ( 9- 6, 85.6) 13- 5 523 H Milford ( 1-12, 79.3) 19- 0 527 A Coe-Brown ( 9- 7, 87.7) 22-12 528 H Pembroke Academy ( 2-12, 78.2) 22- 2 605 H Coe-Brown ( 9- 7, 87.7) 15- 5 607 N Bow (14- 4, 91.1) 17- 6 610 N Gilford (13- 3, 93.5) 15-11
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
416 A Hopkinton 19-13 6 4 0.88
421 A Laconia 22- 3 19 8 0.00
423 H Bow 16- 8 8 5 0.08
425 H Kearsarge 20- 3 17 13 0.00
429 A Portsmouth 7-21 -14 -4 -0.76
501 H Derryfield 17-14 3 5 - -2.00
508 A Bishop Brady 19- 3 16 13 0.00
509 A Pelham 22- 8 14 10 0.00
512 H John Stark 18- 3 15 8 0.00
514 A Gilford 11- 9 2 2 -0.12
519 H Concord Christian 20- 6 14 17 0.00
520 A Lebanon 13- 5 8 10 0.00
523 H Milford 19- 0 19 17 0.00
527 A Coe-Brown 22-12 10 8 0.00
528 H Pembroke Academy 22- 2 20 18 0.00
605 H Coe-Brown 15- 5 10 8 0.00
607 N Bow 17- 6 11 5 0.24
610 N Gilford 15-11 4 2 1.72
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 501 H Derryfield 17-14 3 5 - -2.00 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
St Thomas Aquinas Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Bedford | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Belmont | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 10- 0 vs 0-10 | ||
| Bishop Brady | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Bishop Guertin | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Bow | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Campbell | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 10- 0 vs 2- 8 | ||
| Coe-Brown | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Concord | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Concord Christian | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| ConVal | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 11- 0 vs 2- 9 | ||
| Derryfield | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Dover | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Exeter HS | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Gilford | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Goffstown | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Hanover | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Hopkinton | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonborou | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 9- 0 vs 0- 9 | ||
| John Stark | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Kearsarge | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Kennett | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Kingswood | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Laconia | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Lebanon | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Londonderry | St Thomas Aquinas | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Manchester Central-West | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Manchester Memorial | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Merrimack | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Merrimack Valley | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Milford | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Nashua North | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Nashua South | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Oyster River-Newmarket | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Pelham | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Pembroke Academy | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Plymouth | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 10- 0 vs 3- 7 | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Souhegan | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Spaulding | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Timberlane | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Trinity Manchester | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas 9- 0 vs 3- 5 | ||
| Windham | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Winnacunnet | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas |
PowerWise = 47
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.96
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Hopkinton (15- 3, 91.5) 19-13 -8.36 19.57 0.16 0.89 17.49
0 A Laconia (11- 5, 87.9) 22- 3 -11.97 15.96 0.16 0.89 14.29
0 H Bow (14- 4, 91.1) 16- 8 -8.84 19.08 -0.16 0.89 16.78
0 H Kearsarge ( 7- 8, 82.9) 20- 3 -16.99 10.93 -0.16 0.89 9.56
0 A Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 7-21 -0.00 27.93 0.16 0.89 -0.14
0 H Derryfield (13- 5, 90.9) 17-14 -9.03 18.90 -0.16 0.89 16.62
0 A Bishop Brady ( 3- 9, 82.5) 19- 3 -17.40 10.53 0.16 0.89 9.47
0 A Pelham ( 7- 8, 85.7) 22- 8 -14.23 13.70 0.16 0.89 12.28
0 H John Stark (13- 3, 87.7) 18- 3 -12.20 15.72 -0.16 0.89 13.80
0 A Gilford (13- 3, 93.5) 11- 9 -6.36 21.57 0.16 0.89 19.26
0 H Concord Christ ( 2-12, 79.1) 20- 6 -20.81 7.12 -0.16 0.89 6.17
0 A Lebanon ( 9- 6, 85.6) 13- 5 -14.30 13.63 0.16 0.89 12.22
0 H Milford ( 1-12, 79.3) 19- 0 -20.61 7.32 -0.16 0.89 6.35
0 A Coe-Brown ( 9- 7, 87.7) 22-12 -12.17 15.75 0.16 0.89 14.11
0 H Pembroke Acade ( 2-12, 78.2) 22- 2 -21.73 6.19 -0.16 0.89 5.35
0 H Coe-Brown ( 9- 7, 87.7) 15- 5 -12.17 15.75 -0.16 0.89 13.83
0 N Bow (14- 4, 91.1) 17- 6 -8.84 19.08 -0.00 0.89 16.92
0 N Gilford (13- 3, 93.5) 15-11 -6.36 21.57 -0.00 0.89 19.12
------
223.49
|
winning pts = 223.6274 losing points = -0.1380
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------