Souhegan
W-L: (14- 4) PR = 95.2221Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 H Concord ( 2-14, 87.3) 16- 1 418 A Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 19- 5 421 A Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 6-16 425 H Nashua North ( 1-11, 85.5) 21- 1 428 A Pinkerton Academy (15- 3, 95.7) 8- 9 505 H Manchester Central-Wes ( 4-12, 84.2) 17- 2 507 H Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 17- 3 512 H Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 13-12 516 H Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 11-12 519 A Windham ( 5-11, 89.0) 18-12 521 H Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 7- 5 523 A Concord ( 2-14, 87.3) 15- 5 528 A Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 17-12 529 H Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 16- 3 530 A Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 12-11 605 H Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 7- 5 608 N Pinkerton Academy (15- 3, 95.7) 9- 8 610 N Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 7-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 H Concord 16- 1 15 8 0.00
418 A Salem 19- 5 14 7 0.00
421 A Portsmouth 6-16 -10 -5 -0.17
425 H Nashua North 21- 1 20 10 0.00
428 A Pinkerton Academy 8- 9 -1 -1 -0.34
505 H Manchester Central-Wes 17- 2 15 11 0.00
507 H Dover 17- 3 14 7 0.00
512 H Nashua South 13-12 1 2 -1.20
516 H Exeter HS 11-12 -1 2 - -2.90
519 A Windham 18-12 6 6 0.00
521 H Bishop Guertin 7- 5 2 0 1.55
523 A Concord 15- 5 10 8 0.00
528 A Bedford 17-12 5 2 + 3.15
529 H Salem 16- 3 13 7 0.00
530 A Londonderry 12-11 1 4 - -2.72
605 H Bishop Guertin 7- 5 2 0 1.55
608 N Pinkerton Academy 9- 8 1 -1 1.51
610 N Portsmouth 7-12 -5 -5 -0.32
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 516 H Exeter HS 11-12 -1 2 - -2.90 530 A Londonderry 12-11 1 4 - -2.72 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 528 A Bedford 17-12 5 2 + 3.15 |
Souhegan Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Bedford | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Belmont | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Bishop Brady | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Bow | Souhegan | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Souhegan | |
| Campbell | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Coe-Brown | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Concord | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Concord Christian | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| ConVal | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Derryfield | Souhegan | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Souhegan | |
| Dover | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Goffstown | Souhegan | Souhegan 2- 2 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Hanover | Souhegan | Souhegan 2- 1 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Souhegan | Souhegan 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Hopkinton | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonborou | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| John Stark | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Kearsarge | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Kennett | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Kingswood | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Laconia | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Lebanon | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Londonderry | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Manchester Central-West | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Manchester Memorial | Souhegan | Souhegan 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Merrimack | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Milford | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Nashua North | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Nashua South | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Oyster River-Newmarket | Souhegan | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Souhegan | |
| Pelham | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | tied - (10- 2) (10- 2) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Plymouth | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Spaulding | Souhegan | Souhegan 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Timberlane | Souhegan | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Souhegan | |
| Trinity Manchester | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Windham | Souhegan | Souhegan | ||
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Winnacunnet |
PowerWise = 43
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.96
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Concord ( 2-14, 87.3) 16- 1 -12.58 15.34 -0.16 0.89 13.47
0 A Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 19- 5 -11.83 16.10 0.16 0.89 14.41
0 A Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 6-16 -0.00 27.93 0.16 0.89 -0.14
0 H Nashua North ( 1-11, 85.5) 21- 1 -14.43 13.49 -0.16 0.89 11.82
0 A Pinkerton Acad (15- 3, 95.7) 8- 9 -4.17 23.76 0.16 0.89 -3.56
0 H Manchester Cen ( 4-12, 84.2) 17- 2 -15.68 12.24 -0.16 0.89 10.72
0 H Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 17- 3 -11.38 16.55 -0.16 0.89 14.54
0 H Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 13-12 -6.72 21.21 -0.16 0.89 18.67
0 H Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 11-12 -6.42 21.51 -0.16 0.89 -5.83
0 A Windham ( 5-11, 89.0) 18-12 -10.89 17.03 0.16 0.89 15.24
0 H Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 7- 5 -4.97 22.95 -0.16 0.89 20.21
0 A Concord ( 2-14, 87.3) 15- 5 -12.58 15.34 0.16 0.89 13.74
0 A Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 17-12 -6.68 21.25 0.16 0.89 18.98
0 H Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 16- 3 -11.83 16.10 -0.16 0.89 14.13
0 A Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 12-11 -8.55 19.37 0.16 0.89 17.31
0 H Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 7- 5 -4.97 22.95 -0.16 0.89 20.21
0 N Pinkerton Acad (15- 3, 95.7) 9- 8 -4.17 23.76 -0.00 0.89 21.06
0 N Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 7-12 -0.00 27.93 -0.00 0.89 -0.00
------
214.99
|
winning pts = 224.5167 losing points = -9.5290
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------