---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:00 PDT

safe3step girls Seymour 1
  
Seymour               
W-L: ( 9- 3) PR = 92.0396

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 225 A Ooltewah ( 3-12, 81.8) 16- 4 228 A White Station ( 1-11, 83.5) 20- 4 301 A Independence ( 8- 8, 89.2) 9- 6 301 A Hutchison School (10- 6, 93.8) 7- 8 302 N St Marys Episcopal ( 9- 5, 95.4) 8-13 318 H Pigeon Forge ( 8- 5, 83.8) 14- 1 414 H Farragut (10- 4, 88.5) 16- 7 421 H Gatlinburg Pittman (12- 5, 87.7) 17- 7 429 H Sevier County ( 0-15, 75.7) 19- 3 501 H William Blount ( 9- 7, 85.0) 22- 5 506 H Gatlinburg Pittman (12- 5, 87.7) 16- 7 517 N Page ( 9- 7, 91.6) 12-13

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   225 A Ooltewah               16- 4      12    10           0.00
   228 A White Station          20- 4      16     8           0.00
   301 A Independence            9- 6       3     2           0.69
   301 A Hutchison School        7- 8      -1    -2           1.34
   302 N St Marys Episcopal      8-13      -5    -3          -1.61
   318 H Pigeon Forge           14- 1      13     9           0.00
   414 H Farragut               16- 7       9     4           0.87
   421 H Gatlinburg Pittman     17- 7      10     5           0.08
   429 H Sevier County          19- 3      16    17           0.00
   501 H William Blount         22- 5      17     8           0.00
   506 H Gatlinburg Pittman     16- 7       9     5           0.08
   517 N Page                   12-13      -1     0          -1.41

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Seymour Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Arlington Seymour tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seymour
Bartlett Seymour tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Seymour
Baylor School Seymour tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seymour
Bearden Seymour tied - ( 4- 0) ( 4- 0) Seymour
Bradley Central Seymour tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Seymour
Brentwood Brentwood insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) Brentwood
Briarcrest Christian Briarcrest Christian insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) Briarcrest Christian
Centennial Seymour tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seymour
Christ Presbyterian Acad Seymour insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seymour
Christian Academy Knoxvi Seymour insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Seymour
Collierville Seymour tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) Seymour
Cookeville Cookeville insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 0) Cookeville
Dobyns Bennett Seymour Seymour   4- 0 vs 0- 4
Ensworth Ensworth Ensworth   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Evangelical Christian Seymour tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Seymour
Farragut Seymour Seymour  
Father Ryan Father Ryan Father Ryan   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Franklin Franklin Franklin   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Franklin Road Academy Seymour insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seymour
Gatlinburg Pittman Seymour Seymour  
Girls Preparatory School Seymour insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seymour
Green Hill Seymour insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Seymour
Harpeth Hall Harpeth Hall Harpeth Hall   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Heritage Seymour Seymour   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Hillsboro Seymour insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Seymour
Houston Seymour insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) Seymour
Hunters Lane Seymour insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Seymour
Hutchison School Hutchison School Hutchison School  
Independence Seymour Seymour  
Knoxville Catholic Seymour tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) Seymour
Lausanne Collegiate Seymour tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Seymour
Maryville Seymour insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Seymour
Ooltewah Seymour Seymour  
Page Page Page  
Pigeon Forge Seymour Seymour  
Pope John Paul II Seymour insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seymour
Ravenwood Ravenwood Ravenwood   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Science Hill Seymour Seymour   5- 0 vs 1- 4
Sevier County Seymour Seymour  
Signal Mountain Seymour insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Seymour
Soddy Daisy Seymour Seymour   3- 0 vs 1- 2
St Agnes Academy Seymour tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Seymour
St Benedict Seymour tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seymour
St Cecilia Academy Seymour   Seymour
St Georges Seymour tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Seymour
St Marys Episcopal St Marys Episcopal St Marys Episcopal  
Summit Seymour insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seymour
University School Nashvi Seymour tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Seymour
Upperman Seymour insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Seymour
Walker Valley Seymour Seymour   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Webb School Bell Buckle Seymour   Seymour
Webb School Knoxville Seymour insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Seymour
West Seymour insuffient: ( 6- 0)( 5- 1) Seymour
White Station Seymour Seymour  
William Blount Seymour Seymour  
Wilson Central Seymour   Seymour

PowerWise = 45


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 12.88

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Ooltewah        ( 3-12, 81.8)    16- 4      -18.11       8.71       0.56         1.07             9.95
   0 A White Station   ( 1-11, 83.5)    20- 4      -16.38      10.44       0.56         1.07            11.80
   0 A Independence    ( 8- 8, 89.2)     9- 6      -10.74      16.08       0.56         1.07            17.86
   0 A Hutchison Scho  (10- 6, 93.8)     7- 8       -6.08      20.74       0.56         1.07            -5.93
   0 N St Marys Episc  ( 9- 5, 95.4)     8-13       -4.47      22.35      -0.00         1.07            -4.79
   0 H Pigeon Forge    ( 8- 5, 83.8)    14- 1      -16.06      10.77      -0.56         1.07            10.95
   0 H Farragut        (10- 4, 88.5)    16- 7      -11.43      15.39      -0.56         1.07            15.91
   0 H Gatlinburg Pit  (12- 5, 87.7)    17- 7      -12.22      14.60      -0.56         1.07            15.06
   0 H Sevier County   ( 0-15, 75.7)    19- 3      -24.22       2.60      -0.56         1.07             2.19
   0 H William Blount  ( 9- 7, 85.0)    22- 5      -14.95      11.87      -0.56         1.07            12.14
   0 H Gatlinburg Pit  (12- 5, 87.7)    16- 7      -12.22      14.60      -0.56         1.07            15.06
   0 N Page            ( 9- 7, 91.6)    12-13       -8.27      18.55      -0.00         1.07            -8.88
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        91.33

winning pts = 110.9292 losing points = -19.5970

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------