Riverside
W-L: ( 9- 6) PR = 86.7261Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 228 A Dorman ( 4- 6, 74.3) 18- 2 304 H Blythewood ( 4-10, 79.2) 16- 4 305 H River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 9-10 307 H Byrnes (10- 7, 85.2) 13- 9 312 A JL Mann Academy (12- 4, 90.2) 6-13 314 A Wade Hampton ( 9- 6, 83.8) 20-16 325 A Spartanburg (14- 3, 91.3) 3-15 401 H Catawba Ridge ( 9- 6, 85.6) 17-12 404 H Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 16- 4 409 A Chapin (10- 7, 88.6) 8-19 411 H Dutch Fork ( 7- 8, 83.4) 18- 8 414 A Lexington (15- 1, 95.7) 4-15 415 H Boiling Springs ( 3- 6, 81.9) 16- 4 422 H Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 17- 2 425 A Fort Mill ( 8- 2, 89.1) 9-13
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
228 A Dorman 18- 2 16 12 0.00
304 H Blythewood 16- 4 12 8 0.00
305 H River Bluff 9-10 -1 2 - -3.38
307 H Byrnes 13- 9 4 2 1.86
312 A JL Mann Academy 6-13 -7 -4 -0.95
314 A Wade Hampton 20-16 4 2 1.71
325 A Spartanburg 3-15 -12 -5 0.00
401 H Catawba Ridge 17-12 5 2 + 3.25
404 H Eastside 16- 4 12 7 0.00
409 A Chapin 8-19 -11 -3 - -2.50
411 H Dutch Fork 18- 8 10 4 1.06
414 A Lexington 4-15 -11 -10 0.00
415 H Boiling Springs 16- 4 12 5 0.00
422 H Eastside 17- 2 15 7 0.00
425 A Fort Mill 9-13 -4 -3 -0.97
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 305 H River Bluff 9-10 -1 2 - -3.38 409 A Chapin 8-19 -11 -3 - -2.50 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 401 H Catawba Ridge 17-12 5 2 + 3.25 |
Riverside Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | Riverside | Riverside 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Academic Magnet | Riverside | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Riverside | |
| Aiken | Riverside | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Riverside | |
| Ashley Hall | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Beaufort | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Bishop England | Bishop England | Bishop England 4- 1 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Bluffton | Riverside | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Riverside | |
| Blythewood | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Boiling Springs | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Byrnes | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Carolina Forest | Riverside | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Riverside | |
| Catawba Ridge | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Chapin | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Christ Church Episcopal | Christ Church Episcopal | tied - ( 3- 2) ( 3- 2) | Christ Church Episcopal | |
| Clover | Riverside | tied - ( 5- 4) ( 5- 4) | Riverside | |
| Dorman | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Dutch Fork | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Eastside | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Fort Mill | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Fountain Inn | Riverside | Riverside 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Greenville | Riverside | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | Riverside | |
| Heathwood Hall | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Hillcrest | Riverside | Riverside 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Hilton Head | Hilton Head | Hilton Head | ||
| Irmo | Riverside | Riverside 2- 3 vs 0- 5 | ||
| James Island | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | ||
| Legion Collegiate Academ | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Lexington | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Mauldin | Riverside | Riverside 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| May River | Riverside | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Riverside | |
| Mid-Carolina | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Myrtle Beach | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Nation Ford | Riverside | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 3) | Riverside | |
| North Myrtle Beach | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Philip Simmons | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Pinewood Prep | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | ||
| Ridge View | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| River Bluff | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Socastee | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Spartanburg | Spartanburg | Spartanburg | ||
| Spring Valley | Riverside | Riverside 2- 3 vs 0- 5 | ||
| St James | Riverside | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Riverside | |
| St Josephs Catholic | Riverside | Riverside 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| TL Hanna | TL Hanna | insuffient: ( 5- 2)( 6- 1) | TL Hanna | |
| Trinity Collegiate | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Waccamaw | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Wade Hampton | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Wando | Wando | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | Wando | |
| West Ashley | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Westside | Riverside | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Riverside | |
| White Knoll | Riverside | Riverside 4- 3 vs 0- 7 | ||
| Woodmont | Riverside | Riverside 2- 1 vs 0- 3 |
PowerWise = 42
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.58
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Dorman ( 4- 6, 74.3) 18- 2 -25.56 8.11 0.62 0.91 7.90
0 H Blythewood ( 4-10, 79.2) 16- 4 -20.70 12.97 -0.62 0.91 11.18
0 H River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 9-10 -14.94 18.73 -0.62 0.91 -14.08
0 H Byrnes (10- 7, 85.2) 13- 9 -14.69 18.98 -0.62 0.91 16.62
0 A JL Mann Academ (12- 4, 90.2) 6-13 -9.74 23.93 0.62 0.91 -8.26
0 A Wade Hampton ( 9- 6, 83.8) 20-16 -16.08 17.59 0.62 0.91 16.48
0 A Spartanburg (14- 3, 91.3) 3-15 -8.59 25.08 0.62 0.91 -7.22
0 H Catawba Ridge ( 9- 6, 85.6) 17-12 -14.31 19.36 -0.62 0.91 16.97
0 H Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 16- 4 -19.06 14.61 -0.62 0.91 12.67
0 A Chapin (10- 7, 88.6) 8-19 -11.29 22.38 0.62 0.91 -9.66
0 H Dutch Fork ( 7- 8, 83.4) 18- 8 -16.49 17.18 -0.62 0.91 14.99
0 A Lexington (15- 1, 95.7) 4-15 -4.23 29.44 0.62 0.91 -3.27
0 H Boiling Spring ( 3- 6, 81.9) 16- 4 -17.99 15.68 -0.62 0.91 13.63
0 H Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 17- 2 -19.06 14.61 -0.62 0.91 12.67
0 A Fort Mill ( 8- 2, 89.1) 9-13 -10.76 22.91 0.62 0.91 -9.18
------
71.43
|
winning pts = 123.1043 losing points = -51.6719
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------