River Bluff
W-L: (10- 7) PR = 84.9615Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 225 A Spartanburg (14- 3, 91.3) 7-15 227 H Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 8-12 303 A Dutch Fork ( 7- 8, 83.4) 5- 4 305 A Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 10- 9 306 H Spring Valley ( 7- 8, 71.7) 18- 2 313 A Catawba Ridge ( 9- 6, 85.6) 5-14 317 H Aiken ( 5- 7, 79.5) 18- 6 320 H Chapin (10- 7, 88.6) 7-11 322 H St James (13- 3, 83.5) 17- 7 327 A Blythewood ( 4-10, 79.2) 13- 6 329 H Bishop England (15- 2, 94.7) 1-17 402 H Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 16- 6 407 A Irmo ( 0-16, 66.8) 22- 3 409 A White Knoll ( 2-11, 73.3) 19- 3 410 H Lexington (15- 1, 95.7) 5-16 426 H Carolina Forest (10- 7, 83.6) 11- 8 429 A Lexington (15- 1, 95.7) 5-19
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
225 A Spartanburg 7-15 -8 -7 0.00
227 H Clover 8-12 -4 -1 - -3.49
303 A Dutch Fork 5- 4 1 1 0.07
305 A Riverside 10- 9 1 -2 + 3.38
306 H Spring Valley 18- 2 16 14 0.00
313 A Catawba Ridge 5-14 -9 -1 - -3.75
317 H Aiken 18- 6 12 6 0.00
320 H Chapin 7-11 -4 -3 -0.97
322 H St James 17- 7 10 2 + 2.90
327 A Blythewood 13- 6 7 5 0.00
329 H Bishop England 1-17 -16 -9 0.00
402 H Nation Ford 16- 6 10 4 0.87
407 A Irmo 22- 3 19 18 0.00
409 A White Knoll 19- 3 16 11 0.00
410 H Lexington 5-16 -11 -10 0.00
426 H Carolina Forest 11- 8 3 2 1.06
429 A Lexington 5-19 -14 -11 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 227 H Clover 8-12 -4 -1 - -3.49 313 A Catawba Ridge 5-14 -9 -1 - -3.75 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 305 A Riverside 10- 9 1 -2 + 3.38 322 H St James 17- 7 10 2 + 2.90 |
River Bluff Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | River Bluff | River Bluff 6- 1 vs 4- 3 | ||
| Academic Magnet | River Bluff | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | River Bluff | |
| Aiken | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Ashley Hall | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Beaufort | River Bluff | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Bishop England | Bishop England | Bishop England | ||
| Bluffton | River Bluff | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Blythewood | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Boiling Springs | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | River Bluff | |
| Byrnes | Byrnes | insuffient: ( 4- 3)( 3- 4) | Byrnes | |
| Carolina Forest | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | ||
| Chapin | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Christ Church Episcopal | Christ Church Episcopal | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Christ Church Episcopal | |
| Clover | Clover | Clover | ||
| Dorman | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | River Bluff | |
| Dutch Fork | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Eastside | River Bluff | River Bluff 3- 3 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Fort Mill | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Fountain Inn | River Bluff | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | River Bluff | |
| Greenville | River Bluff | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Heathwood Hall | River Bluff | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Hillcrest | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Hilton Head | Hilton Head | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Hilton Head | |
| Irmo | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| James Island | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | River Bluff | |
| JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 3- 1 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Legion Collegiate Academ | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Lexington | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Lucy Beckham | |
| Mauldin | River Bluff | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | River Bluff | |
| May River | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Mid-Carolina | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Myrtle Beach | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Nation Ford | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| North Myrtle Beach | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate 5- 0 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Philip Simmons | Philip Simmons | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Philip Simmons | |
| Pinewood Prep | River Bluff | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | River Bluff | |
| Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | ||
| Ridge View | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Riverside | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Socastee | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Spartanburg | Spartanburg | Spartanburg | ||
| Spring Valley | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| St James | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| St Josephs Catholic | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| TL Hanna | TL Hanna | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | TL Hanna | |
| Trinity Collegiate | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | River Bluff | |
| Waccamaw | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Wade Hampton | River Bluff | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | River Bluff | |
| Wando | Wando | insuffient: ( 2- 4)( 3- 3) | Wando | |
| West Ashley | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Westside | River Bluff | River Bluff 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| White Knoll | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Woodmont | River Bluff | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | River Bluff |
PowerWise = 39
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.58
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Spartanburg (14- 3, 91.3) 7-15 -8.59 25.08 0.62 0.80 -6.37
0 H Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 8-12 -13.80 19.86 -0.62 0.80 -11.52
0 A Dutch Fork ( 7- 8, 83.4) 5- 4 -16.49 17.18 0.62 0.80 14.22
0 A Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 10- 9 -13.17 20.50 0.62 0.80 16.87
0 H Spring Valley ( 7- 8, 71.7) 18- 2 -28.20 5.47 -0.62 0.80 3.87
0 A Catawba Ridge ( 9- 6, 85.6) 5-14 -14.31 19.36 0.62 0.80 -10.93
0 H Aiken ( 5- 7, 79.5) 18- 6 -20.35 13.31 -0.62 0.80 10.14
0 H Chapin (10- 7, 88.6) 7-11 -11.29 22.38 -0.62 0.80 -9.51
0 H St James (13- 3, 83.5) 17- 7 -16.42 17.25 -0.62 0.80 13.28
0 A Blythewood ( 4-10, 79.2) 13- 6 -20.70 12.97 0.62 0.80 10.85
0 H Bishop England (15- 2, 94.7) 1-17 -5.19 28.48 -0.62 0.80 -4.64
0 H Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 16- 6 -18.44 15.22 -0.62 0.80 11.67
0 A Irmo ( 0-16, 66.8) 22- 3 -33.08 1.00 0.62 0.80 1.29
0 A White Knoll ( 2-11, 73.3) 19- 3 -26.57 7.09 0.62 0.80 6.16
0 H Lexington (15- 1, 95.7) 5-16 -4.23 29.44 -0.62 0.80 -3.88
0 H Carolina Fores (10- 7, 83.6) 11- 8 -16.26 17.41 -0.62 0.80 13.41
0 A Lexington (15- 1, 95.7) 5-19 -4.23 29.44 0.62 0.80 -2.89
------
52.02
|
winning pts = 101.7635 losing points = -49.7435
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------