Portsmouth
W-L: (18- 0) PR = 99.9000Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 H Hollis-Brookline ( 8-10, 88.5) 18- 4 416 H Winnacunnet (19- 1, 95.7) 17- 6 418 A Pinkerton Academy (15- 3, 95.7) 9- 7 421 H Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 16- 6 425 H Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 16- 3 428 A Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 18- 8 429 H St Thomas Aquinas (17- 1, 95.8) 21- 7 505 H Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 16- 7 507 H Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 22- 9 512 H Concord ( 2-14, 87.3) 18- 1 513 A Windham ( 5-11, 89.0) 17- 4 516 A Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 20- 6 519 A Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 21- 1 521 A Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 20- 3 528 H Manchester Central-Wes ( 4-12, 84.2) 19- 1 605 H Windham ( 5-11, 89.0) 20- 8 608 N Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 19- 3 610 N Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 12- 7
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 H Hollis-Brookline 18- 4 14 12 0.00
416 H Winnacunnet 17- 6 11 4 0.68
418 A Pinkerton Academy 9- 7 2 4 - -2.02
421 H Souhegan 16- 6 10 5 0.17
425 H Dover 16- 3 13 12 0.00
428 A Londonderry 18- 8 10 8 0.00
429 H St Thomas Aquinas 21- 7 14 4 0.76
505 H Nashua South 16- 7 9 7 0.00
507 H Exeter HS 22- 9 13 7 0.00
512 H Concord 18- 1 17 13 0.00
513 A Windham 17- 4 13 11 0.00
516 A Bishop Guertin 20- 6 14 5 0.18
519 A Bedford 21- 1 20 7 0.00
521 A Salem 20- 3 17 12 0.00
528 H Manchester Central-Wes 19- 1 18 16 0.00
605 H Windham 20- 8 12 11 0.00
608 N Exeter HS 19- 3 16 6 0.00
610 N Souhegan 12- 7 5 5 0.32
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 418 A Pinkerton Academy 9- 7 2 4 - -2.02 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Portsmouth Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Bedford | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Belmont | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Bishop Brady | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Bishop Guertin | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Bow | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Campbell | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Coe-Brown | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Concord | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Concord Christian | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| ConVal | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Derryfield | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Dover | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Exeter HS | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Gilford | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Goffstown | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Hanover | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Hopkinton | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonborou | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| John Stark | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Kearsarge | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Keene-Monadnock | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Kennett | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Kingswood | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Laconia | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Lebanon | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Londonderry | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Manchester Central-West | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Manchester Memorial | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Merrimack | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Merrimack Valley | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Milford | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Nashua North | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 10- 0 vs 1- 9 | ||
| Nashua South | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Oyster River-Newmarket | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Pelham | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Pembroke Academy | Portsmouth | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Portsmouth | |
| Pinkerton Academy | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Plymouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Souhegan | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Spaulding | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Timberlane | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Windham | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Winnacunnet | Portsmouth | Portsmouth |
PowerWise = 48
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.96
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Hollis-Brookli ( 8-10, 88.5) 18- 4 -11.44 16.49 -0.16 0.89 14.48
0 H Winnacunnet (19- 1, 95.7) 17- 6 -4.17 23.76 -0.16 0.89 20.93
0 A Pinkerton Acad (15- 3, 95.7) 9- 7 -4.17 23.76 0.16 0.89 21.20
0 H Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 16- 6 -4.68 23.25 -0.16 0.89 20.48
0 H Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 16- 3 -11.38 16.55 -0.16 0.89 14.54
0 A Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 18- 8 -8.55 19.37 0.16 0.89 17.31
0 H St Thomas Aqui (17- 1, 95.8) 21- 7 -4.08 23.84 -0.16 0.89 21.00
0 H Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 16- 7 -6.72 21.21 -0.16 0.89 18.67
0 H Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 22- 9 -6.42 21.51 -0.16 0.89 18.93
0 H Concord ( 2-14, 87.3) 18- 1 -12.58 15.34 -0.16 0.89 13.47
0 A Windham ( 5-11, 89.0) 17- 4 -10.89 17.03 0.16 0.89 15.24
0 A Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 20- 6 -4.97 22.95 0.16 0.89 20.49
0 A Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 21- 1 -6.68 21.25 0.16 0.89 18.98
0 A Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 20- 3 -11.83 16.10 0.16 0.89 14.41
0 H Manchester Cen ( 4-12, 84.2) 19- 1 -15.68 12.24 -0.16 0.89 10.72
0 H Windham ( 5-11, 89.0) 20- 8 -10.89 17.03 -0.16 0.89 14.96
0 N Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 19- 3 -6.42 21.51 -0.00 0.89 19.07
0 N Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 12- 7 -4.68 23.25 -0.00 0.89 20.61
------
315.48
|
winning pts = 315.4769 losing points = 0.0000
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------