Pinkerton Academy
W-L: (15- 3) PR = 95.7287Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 A Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 17- 4 418 H Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 7- 9 421 A Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 20- 3 425 H Manchester Central-Wes ( 4-12, 84.2) 19- 3 428 H Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 9- 8 430 H Hanover (11- 8, 90.6) 16- 8 502 A Goffstown ( 6-11, 87.0) 20- 4 503 H Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 15- 7 505 A Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 17-12 507 H Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 18-13 513 A Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 9-10 516 H Windham ( 5-11, 89.0) 7- 5 519 A Concord ( 2-14, 87.3) 17- 2 521 H Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 12-10 528 A Nashua North ( 1-11, 85.5) 21- 1 529 H Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 15- 8 605 H Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 12- 9 608 N Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 8- 9
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 A Salem 17- 4 13 8 0.00
418 H Portsmouth 7- 9 -2 -4 + 2.02
421 A Dover 20- 3 17 7 0.00
425 H Manchester Central-Wes 19- 3 16 12 0.00
428 H Souhegan 9- 8 1 1 0.34
430 H Hanover 16- 8 8 5 0.00
502 A Goffstown 20- 4 16 9 0.00
503 H Nashua South 15- 7 8 3 + 2.30
505 A Exeter HS 17-12 5 2 + 2.91
507 H Londonderry 18-13 5 5 0.46
513 A Bishop Guertin 9-10 -1 1 -1.65
516 H Windham 7- 5 2 7 - -3.00
519 A Concord 17- 2 15 8 0.00
521 H Bedford 12-10 2 3 -0.66
528 A Nashua North 21- 1 20 10 0.00
529 H Londonderry 15- 8 7 5 0.46
605 H Bedford 12- 9 3 3 0.34
608 N Souhegan 8- 9 -1 1 -1.51
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 516 H Windham 7- 5 2 7 - -3.00 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 418 H Portsmouth 7- 9 -2 -4 + 2.02 503 H Nashua South 15- 7 8 3 + 2.30 505 A Exeter HS 17-12 5 2 + 2.91 |
Pinkerton Academy Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Bedford | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Belmont | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Bishop Brady | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | ||
| Bow | Pinkerton Academy | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Campbell | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Coe-Brown | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Concord | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Concord Christian | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| ConVal | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Derryfield | Pinkerton Academy | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Dover | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Exeter HS | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Gilford | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Goffstown | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Hanover | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 5- 1 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Hopkinton | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonborou | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| John Stark | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Kearsarge | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Kennett | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Kingswood | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Laconia | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Lebanon | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Londonderry | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Manchester Central-West | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Manchester Memorial | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Merrimack | Pinkerton Academy | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Merrimack Valley | Pinkerton Academy | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Milford | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Nashua North | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Nashua South | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Oyster River-Newmarket | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Pelham | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Plymouth | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth | ||
| Salem | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Souhegan | Pinkerton Academy | tied - (10- 2) (10- 2) | Pinkerton Academy | |
| Spaulding | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | St Thomas Aquinas | |
| Timberlane | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Windham | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | insuffient: ( 4- 2)( 5- 1) | Winnacunnet |
PowerWise = 44
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.96
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Salem ( 5-13, 88.1) 17- 4 -11.83 16.10 0.16 0.89 14.41
0 H Portsmouth (18- 0, 99.9) 7- 9 -0.00 27.93 -0.16 0.89 -0.14
0 A Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 20- 3 -11.38 16.55 0.16 0.89 14.81
0 H Manchester Cen ( 4-12, 84.2) 19- 3 -15.68 12.24 -0.16 0.89 10.72
0 H Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 9- 8 -4.68 23.25 -0.16 0.89 20.48
0 H Hanover (11- 8, 90.6) 16- 8 -9.29 18.64 -0.16 0.89 16.39
0 A Goffstown ( 6-11, 87.0) 20- 4 -12.89 15.04 0.16 0.89 13.47
0 H Nashua South (14- 5, 93.2) 15- 7 -6.72 21.21 -0.16 0.89 18.67
0 A Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 17-12 -6.42 21.51 0.16 0.89 19.21
0 H Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 18-13 -8.55 19.37 -0.16 0.89 17.04
0 A Bishop Guertin ( 8- 5, 94.9) 9-10 -4.97 22.95 0.16 0.89 -4.27
0 H Windham ( 5-11, 89.0) 7- 5 -10.89 17.03 -0.16 0.89 14.96
0 A Concord ( 2-14, 87.3) 17- 2 -12.58 15.34 0.16 0.89 13.74
0 H Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 12-10 -6.68 21.25 -0.16 0.89 18.70
0 A Nashua North ( 1-11, 85.5) 21- 1 -14.43 13.49 0.16 0.89 12.10
0 H Londonderry ( 6-11, 91.3) 15- 8 -8.55 19.37 -0.16 0.89 17.04
0 H Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 12- 9 -6.68 21.25 -0.16 0.89 18.70
0 N Souhegan (14- 4, 95.2) 8- 9 -4.68 23.25 -0.00 0.89 -4.15
------
231.88
|
winning pts = 240.4318 losing points = -8.5563
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------