Oyster River-Newmark
W-L: ( 9- 7) PR = 87.6992Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 418 H Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 5- 8 421 A Winnacunnet (19- 1, 95.7) 4-14 423 H Goffstown ( 6-11, 87.0) 9- 8 424 H Spaulding ( 2-14, 78.6) 18- 1 425 A Alvirne ( 1-14, 76.4) 21- 2 507 A Timberlane (10- 6, 89.7) 10-13 514 A Manchester Memorial ( 1-15, 76.5) 19- 1 516 H Hollis-Brookline ( 8-10, 88.5) 9- 8 519 A Kingswood ( 6-10, 83.8) 16- 8 520 H Merrimack Valley (12- 5, 90.1) 11- 9 521 H Kennett ( 5- 9, 83.9) 13- 9 523 A Hanover (11- 8, 90.6) 10-14 527 H Merrimack (14- 2, 91.0) 15-16 530 A Spaulding ( 2-14, 78.6) 19- 3 605 A Merrimack Valley (12- 5, 90.1) 9-14 607 N Merrimack Valley (12- 5, 90.1) 9-14
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
418 H Dover 5- 8 -3 -1 - -2.33
421 A Winnacunnet 4-14 -10 -8 0.00
423 H Goffstown 9- 8 1 1 0.16
424 H Spaulding 18- 1 17 9 0.00
425 A Alvirne 21- 2 19 11 0.00
507 A Timberlane 10-13 -3 -2 -0.80
514 A Manchester Memorial 19- 1 18 11 0.00
516 H Hollis-Brookline 9- 8 1 -1 1.61
519 A Kingswood 16- 8 8 4 1.24
520 H Merrimack Valley 11- 9 2 -2 ++ 4.21
521 H Kennett 13- 9 4 4 0.01
523 A Hanover 10-14 -4 -3 -0.93
527 H Merrimack 15-16 -1 -3 + 2.10
530 A Spaulding 19- 3 16 9 0.00
605 A Merrimack Valley 9-14 -5 -3 - -2.48
607 N Merrimack Valley 9-14 -5 -2 - -2.64
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 418 H Dover 5- 8 -3 -1 - -2.33 605 A Merrimack Valley 9-14 -5 -3 - -2.48 607 N Merrimack Valley 9-14 -5 -2 - -2.64 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 520 H Merrimack Valley 11- 9 2 -2 ++ 4.21 527 H Merrimack 15-16 -1 -3 + 2.10 |
Oyster River-Newmarket Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Belmont | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Bishop Brady | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Bishop Guertin | |
| Bow | Bow | Bow | ||
| Campbell | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | ||
| Concord | Oyster River-Newmarket | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Oyster River-Newmarket | |
| Concord Christian | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| ConVal | Oyster River-Newmarket | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Oyster River-Newmarket | |
| Derryfield | Derryfield | Derryfield | ||
| Dover | Dover | Dover | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 3- 1) | Exeter HS | |
| Gilford | Gilford | Gilford | ||
| Goffstown | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Hanover | Hanover | Hanover | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Hopkinton | Hopkinton | Hopkinton | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonborou | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| John Stark | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Kearsarge | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket 8- 4 vs 2- 9 | ||
| Kennett | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Kingswood | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Laconia | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Lebanon | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Londonderry | Londonderry | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Londonderry | |
| Manchester Central-West | Oyster River-Newmarket | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Oyster River-Newmarket | |
| Manchester Memorial | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Merrimack | Merrimack | Merrimack | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Merrimack Valley | Merrimack Valley | ||
| Milford | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Nashua North | Oyster River-Newmarket | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Oyster River-Newmarket | |
| Nashua South | Nashua South | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Nashua South | |
| Pelham | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Plymouth | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Salem | Salem | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Salem | |
| Souhegan | Souhegan | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Souhegan | |
| Spaulding | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Timberlane | Timberlane | Timberlane | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Windham | Windham | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Windham | |
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet |
PowerWise = 25
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.96
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Dover ( 7- 9, 88.5) 5- 8 -11.38 16.55 -0.16 1.00 -11.50
0 A Winnacunnet (19- 1, 95.7) 4-14 -4.17 23.76 0.16 1.00 -4.00
0 H Goffstown ( 6-11, 87.0) 9- 8 -12.89 15.04 -0.16 1.00 14.85
0 H Spaulding ( 2-14, 78.6) 18- 1 -21.26 6.66 -0.16 1.00 6.49
0 A Alvirne ( 1-14, 76.4) 21- 2 -23.49 4.44 0.16 1.00 4.58
0 A Timberlane (10- 6, 89.7) 10-13 -10.15 17.77 0.16 1.00 -9.97
0 A Manchester Mem ( 1-15, 76.5) 19- 1 -23.43 4.50 0.16 1.00 4.64
0 H Hollis-Brookli ( 8-10, 88.5) 9- 8 -11.44 16.49 -0.16 1.00 16.29
0 A Kingswood ( 6-10, 83.8) 16- 8 -16.12 11.81 0.16 1.00 11.93
0 H Merrimack Vall (12- 5, 90.1) 11- 9 -9.84 18.09 -0.16 1.00 17.89
0 H Kennett ( 5- 9, 83.9) 13- 9 -16.04 11.89 -0.16 1.00 11.70
0 A Hanover (11- 8, 90.6) 10-14 -9.29 18.64 0.16 1.00 -9.11
0 H Merrimack (14- 2, 91.0) 15-16 -8.95 18.98 -0.16 1.00 -9.08
0 A Spaulding ( 2-14, 78.6) 19- 3 -21.26 6.66 0.16 1.00 6.80
0 A Merrimack Vall (12- 5, 90.1) 9-14 -9.84 18.09 0.16 1.00 -9.66
0 N Merrimack Vall (12- 5, 90.1) 9-14 -9.84 18.09 -0.00 1.00 -9.81
------
32.04
|
winning pts = 95.1758 losing points = -63.1317
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------