Nathan Hale/Ingraham
W-L: ( 7- 5) PR = 83.8611Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 311 A Stanwood ( 0- 9, 76.1) 18-10 314 H West Seattle ( 3- 9, 82.5) 12-11 317 H Bainbridge Island (12- 3, 96.7) 4-20 325 A Lincoln ( 0-12, 76.1) 19- 8 402 A Tahoma ( 7- 6, 85.3) 6-19 404 H Ballard (11- 4, 87.0) 2-16 407 A Shoreline ( 8- 4, 85.0) 16-18 410 H Bishop Blanchet ( 7- 8, 88.6) 14-16 411 H Evergreen ( 2- 9, 77.3) 18- 6 423 H Roosevelt ( 3- 8, 82.3) 16- 9 425 A Overlake ( 2- 6, 84.1) 11-11 430 H Squalicum ( 2- 9, 81.6) 15- 7 502 A Garfield ( 4- 8, 81.0) 10- 9
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
311 A Stanwood 18-10 8 7 0.00
314 H West Seattle 12-11 1 2 -0.91
317 H Bainbridge Island 4-20 -16 -12 0.00
325 A Lincoln 19- 8 11 7 0.00
402 A Tahoma 6-19 -13 -2 - -3.02
404 H Ballard 2-16 -14 -3 - -2.41
407 A Shoreline 16-18 -2 -2 -0.32
410 H Bishop Blanchet 14-16 -2 -4 + 2.17
411 H Evergreen 18- 6 12 7 0.00
423 H Roosevelt 16- 9 7 2 + 2.86
425 A Overlake 11-11 0 -1 0.77
430 H Squalicum 15- 7 8 3 + 2.19
502 A Garfield 10- 9 1 2 -1.35
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 402 A Tahoma 6-19 -13 -2 - -3.02 404 H Ballard 2-16 -14 -3 - -2.41 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 410 H Bishop Blanchet 14-16 -2 -4 + 2.17 423 H Roosevelt 16- 9 7 2 + 2.86 430 H Squalicum 15- 7 8 3 + 2.19 |
Nathan Hale/Ingraham Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anacortes | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | |
| Auburn-Riverside | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | |
| Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | Bainbridge Island | ||
| Ballard | Ballard | Ballard | ||
| Bellarmine Prep | Bellarmine Prep | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) | Bellarmine Prep | |
| Bellevue | Bellevue | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Bellevue | |
| Big Cat | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | ||
| Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet | Bishop Blanchet | ||
| Camas | Camas | Camas | ||
| Curtis | Curtis | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Curtis | |
| Eastlake | Eastlake | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Eastlake | |
| Eastside Catholic | Eastside Catholic | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Eastside Catholic | |
| Evergreen | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | ||
| Garfield | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | ||
| Gonzaga Prep | Gonzaga Prep | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 1) | Gonzaga Prep | |
| Graham-Kapowsin | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Holy Names Academy | Holy Names Academy | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 1) | Holy Names Academy | |
| Issaquah | Issaquah | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Issaquah | |
| Kamiakin | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | ||
| Kennedy | Kennedy | Kennedy 4- 0 vs 2- 1 | ||
| Klahowya | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | |
| Lakeside School | Lakeside School | Lakeside School 3- 0 vs 1- 1 | ||
| Lincoln | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | ||
| Mercer Island | Mercer Island | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Mercer Island | |
| Mount Si | Mount Si | Mount Si 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Newport Sammamish Interl | Newport Sammamish Interl | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Newport Sammamish Interl | |
| Northshore | Northshore | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Northshore | |
| Overlake | Overlake | insuffient: ( 3- 4)( 2- 4) | Overlake | |
| Peninsula SD | Peninsula SD | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Peninsula SD | |
| Puyallup | Puyallup | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Puyallup | |
| Richland Hanford | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | ||
| Roosevelt | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | ||
| Sandpoint | Sandpoint | Sandpoint | ||
| Seattle Academy | Seattle Academy | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Seattle Academy | |
| Seattle Prep | Seattle Prep | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Seattle Prep | |
| Shoreline | Shoreline | Shoreline | ||
| Snohomish | Snohomish | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | Snohomish | |
| Spokane | Spokane | Spokane | ||
| Squalicum | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | ||
| Stadium | Stadium | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Stadium | |
| Stanwood | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | ||
| Sumner | Sumner | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Sumner | |
| Tahoma | Tahoma | Tahoma | ||
| West Seattle | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | Nathan Hale/Ingraham | ||
| Woodinville | Woodinville | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Woodinville |
PowerWise = 14
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 12.30
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Stanwood ( 0- 9, 76.1) 18-10 -23.77 1.00 0.53 0.95 1.45
0 H West Seattle ( 3- 9, 82.5) 12-11 -17.41 6.35 -0.53 0.95 5.51
0 H Bainbridge Isl (12- 3, 96.7) 4-20 -3.24 20.53 -0.53 0.95 -3.57
0 A Lincoln ( 0-12, 76.1) 19- 8 -23.77 1.00 0.53 0.95 1.45
0 A Tahoma ( 7- 6, 85.3) 6-19 -14.59 9.18 0.53 0.95 -13.31
0 H Ballard (11- 4, 87.0) 2-16 -12.92 10.85 -0.53 0.95 -12.73
0 A Shoreline ( 8- 4, 85.0) 16-18 -14.90 8.87 0.53 0.95 -13.60
0 H Bishop Blanche ( 7- 8, 88.6) 14-16 -11.33 12.43 -0.53 0.95 -11.23
0 H Evergreen ( 2- 9, 77.3) 18- 6 -22.56 1.21 -0.53 0.95 0.64
0 H Roosevelt ( 3- 8, 82.3) 16- 9 -17.65 6.12 -0.53 0.95 5.29
0 H Squalicum ( 2- 9, 81.6) 15- 7 -18.31 5.46 -0.53 0.95 4.66
0 A Garfield ( 4- 8, 81.0) 10- 9 -18.92 4.84 0.53 0.95 5.09
------
-30.35
|
winning pts = 24.0876 losing points = -54.4342
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------