---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:00 PDT

safe3step girls Mount Hope 1
  
Mount Hope            
W-L: ( 0- 5) PR = 92.9836

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 411 H Cranston West ( 1- 4, 95.0) 5-12 423 A Lincoln ( 5- 2, 98.0) 10-13 501 H Westerly ( 3- 1, 99.0) 4-19 515 H Lincoln ( 5- 2, 98.0) 12-18 521 H Ponaganset ( 1- 2, 95.1) 9-10

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   411 H Cranston West           5-12      -7    -2    -     -2.98
   423 A Lincoln                10-13      -3    -5           1.98
   501 H Westerly                4-19     -15    -6           0.00
   515 H Lincoln                12-18      -6    -5          -0.04
   521 H Ponaganset              9-10      -1    -2           1.06

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   411 H Cranston West           5-12      -7    -2    -     -2.98

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*

Mount Hope Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Barrington Barrington tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Barrington
Bishop Hendricken Bishop Hendricken   Bishop Hendricken
Burrillville Burrillville   Burrillville
Chariho Chariho   Chariho
Classical Classical   Classical
Coventry Coventry   Coventry
Cranston East Cranston East   Cranston East
Cranston West Cranston West Cranston West  
Cumberland Cumberland   Cumberland
East Greenwich East Greenwich   East Greenwich
East Providence East Providence   East Providence
La Salle Academy La Salle Academy   La Salle Academy
Lincoln Lincoln Lincoln  
Middletown Middletown   Middletown
Moses Brown School Moses Brown School   Moses Brown School
Narragansett Narragansett   Narragansett
North Kingstown North Kingstown insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) North Kingstown
North Providence North Providence   North Providence
North Smithfield North Smithfield North Smithfield   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Pilgrim Pilgrim   Pilgrim
Ponaganset Ponaganset Ponaganset  
Portsmouth Portsmouth   Portsmouth
Prout/Exeter-West Gr Prout/Exeter-West Gr   Prout/Exeter-West Gr
Providence CDS-St Ra Mount Hope   Mount Hope
Rogers Rogers   Rogers
Scituate Scituate   Scituate
Smithfield Smithfield   Smithfield
South Kingstown South Kingstown   South Kingstown
Tiverton Tiverton   Tiverton
Toll Gate Toll Gate   Toll Gate
Westerly Westerly Westerly  

PowerWise = 1


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 1.56

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 H Cranston West   ( 1- 4, 95.0)     5-12       -4.89       2.74      -0.01         0.31            -1.53
   0 A Lincoln         ( 5- 2, 98.0)    10-13       -1.94       5.68       0.01         0.31            -0.60
   0 H Westerly        ( 3- 1, 99.0)     4-19       -0.93       6.70      -0.01         0.31            -0.29
   0 H Lincoln         ( 5- 2, 98.0)    12-18       -1.94       5.68      -0.01         0.31            -0.61
   0 H Ponaganset      ( 1- 2, 95.1)     9-10       -4.85       2.78      -0.01         0.31            -1.52
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                        -4.56

winning pts = 0.0000 losing points = -4.5561

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------