Mt Anthony Union
W-L: (10- 2) PR = 99.9000Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 412 A Rutland ( 3-13, 91.2) 18- 2 429 A Brattleboro Union ( 3- 9, 92.7) 18- 3 501 H Rutland ( 3-13, 91.2) 15- 1 503 H Champlain Valley Union (15- 2, 98.9) 17- 7 505 A Burr & Burton Academy (12- 5, 98.5) 9-11 510 H Woodstock Union (10- 8, 95.2) 14- 5 517 H Burr & Burton Academy (12- 5, 98.5) 21- 6 519 H Brattleboro Union ( 3- 9, 92.7) 14- 7 520 A Stratton Mountain Scho ( 0- 8, 90.7) 17- 6 522 H Stratton Mountain Scho ( 0- 8, 90.7) 17- 3 530 A Woodstock Union (10- 8, 95.2) 17- 9 605 H South Burlington (12- 6, 96.9) 10-11
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
412 A Rutland 18- 2 16 8 0.00
429 A Brattleboro Union 18- 3 15 7 0.00
501 H Rutland 15- 1 14 9 0.00
503 H Champlain Valley Union 17- 7 10 2 + 3.48
505 A Burr & Burton Academy 9-11 -2 1 - -2.91
510 H Woodstock Union 14- 5 9 5 0.00
517 H Burr & Burton Academy 21- 6 15 2 + 3.14
519 H Brattleboro Union 14- 7 7 8 0.00
520 A Stratton Mountain Scho 17- 6 11 9 0.00
522 H Stratton Mountain Scho 17- 3 14 10 0.00
530 A Woodstock Union 17- 9 8 4 0.77
605 H South Burlington 10-11 -1 3 -- -4.47
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 605 H South Burlington 10-11 -1 3 -- -4.47 505 A Burr & Burton Academy 9-11 -2 1 - -2.91 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 503 H Champlain Valley Union 17- 7 10 2 + 3.48 517 H Burr & Burton Academy 21- 6 15 2 + 3.14 |
Mt Anthony Union Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bellows Free Academy - S | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union 3- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Brattleboro Union | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union | ||
| Burlington | Mt Anthony Union | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| Burr & Burton Academy | Mt Anthony Union | tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| Champlain Valley Union | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union | ||
| Colchester | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union | ||
| Essex | Mt Anthony Union | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 2) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| Green Mountain Valley | Mt Anthony Union | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| Hartford | Mt Anthony Union | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| Harwood Union | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union | ||
| Lamoille Union | Mt Anthony Union | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| Lyndon Institute | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union | ||
| Middlebury Union | Mt Anthony Union | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| Milton | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union | ||
| Mt Mansfield Union | Mt Anthony Union | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 2) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| Rice Memorial | Mt Anthony Union | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| Rutland | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union | ||
| South Burlington | South Burlington | South Burlington | ||
| Spaulding | Mt Anthony Union | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| St Johnsbury Academy | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Stowe | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union | ||
| Stratton Mountain School | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union | ||
| U-32 | Mt Anthony Union | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Mt Anthony Union | |
| Vergennes/Mt Abraham | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union | ||
| Woodstock Union | Mt Anthony Union | Mt Anthony Union |
PowerWise = 24
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.54
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Rutland ( 3-13, 91.2) 18- 2 -8.71 8.69 0.48 1.29 11.87
0 A Brattleboro Un ( 3- 9, 92.7) 18- 3 -7.21 10.19 0.48 1.29 13.81
0 H Rutland ( 3-13, 91.2) 15- 1 -8.71 8.69 -0.48 1.29 10.63
0 H Champlain Vall (15- 2, 98.9) 17- 7 -1.04 16.36 -0.48 1.29 20.57
0 A Burr & Burton (12- 5, 98.5) 9-11 -1.38 16.02 0.48 1.29 -1.17
0 H Woodstock Unio (10- 8, 95.2) 14- 5 -4.71 12.69 -0.48 1.29 15.82
0 H Burr & Burton (12- 5, 98.5) 21- 6 -1.38 16.02 -0.48 1.29 20.12
0 H Brattleboro Un ( 3- 9, 92.7) 14- 7 -7.21 10.19 -0.48 1.29 12.58
0 A Stratton Mount ( 0- 8, 90.7) 17- 6 -9.21 8.19 0.48 1.29 11.22
0 H Stratton Mount ( 0- 8, 90.7) 17- 3 -9.21 8.19 -0.48 1.29 9.99
0 A Woodstock Unio (10- 8, 95.2) 17- 9 -4.71 12.69 0.48 1.29 17.05
0 H South Burlingt (12- 6, 96.9) 10-11 -3.00 14.41 -0.48 1.29 -4.50
------
137.98
|
winning pts = 143.6562 losing points = -5.6723
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------