James Clemens
W-L: ( 2-10) PR = 87.9449Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 125 A Auburn ( 3- 9, 90.5) 6-19 202 H Vestavia Hills ( 7- 7, 93.1) 2-21 209 A Mountain Brook (14- 0, 99.9) 1-20 215 A Hoover (11- 4, 97.3) 2-15 216 H Trussville ( 0-13, 86.1) 10- 5 222 H Vestavia Hills ( 7- 7, 93.1) 5-20 223 H Spain Park (10- 4, 96.4) 5-21 302 A Trussville ( 0-13, 86.1) 8- 7 405 H Hoover (11- 4, 97.3) 1-15 406 A Spain Park (10- 4, 96.4) 4-19 413 H Mountain Brook (14- 0, 99.9) 3-18 425 A Hoover (11- 4, 97.3) 6-18
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
125 A Auburn 6-19 -13 -3 - -2.17
202 H Vestavia Hills 2-21 -19 -5 -0.11
209 A Mountain Brook 1-20 -19 -12 0.00
215 A Hoover 2-15 -13 -10 0.00
216 H Trussville 10- 5 5 2 + 2.92
222 H Vestavia Hills 5-20 -15 -5 -0.11
223 H Spain Park 5-21 -16 -8 0.00
302 A Trussville 8- 7 1 2 -0.52
405 H Hoover 1-15 -14 -9 0.00
406 A Spain Park 4-19 -15 -9 0.00
413 H Mountain Brook 3-18 -15 -12 0.00
425 A Hoover 6-18 -12 -10 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 125 A Auburn 6-19 -13 -3 - -2.17 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 216 H Trussville 10- 5 5 2 + 2.92 |
James Clemens Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auburn | Auburn | Auburn | ||
| Hoover | Hoover | Hoover | ||
| Mountain Brook | Mountain Brook | Mountain Brook | ||
| Spain Park | Spain Park | Spain Park | ||
| Trussville | James Clemens | James Clemens | ||
| Vestavia Hills | Vestavia Hills | Vestavia Hills |
PowerWise = 1
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.43
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Auburn ( 3- 9, 90.5) 6-19 -9.41 4.34 0.28 1.12 -10.22
0 H Vestavia Hills ( 7- 7, 93.1) 2-21 -6.79 6.97 -0.28 1.12 -7.91
0 A Mountain Brook (14- 0, 99.9) 1-20 -0.00 13.75 0.28 1.12 -0.32
0 A Hoover (11- 4, 97.3) 2-15 -2.62 11.13 0.28 1.12 -2.62
0 H Trussville ( 0-13, 86.1) 10- 5 -13.75 1.00 -0.28 1.12 0.80
0 H Vestavia Hills ( 7- 7, 93.1) 5-20 -6.79 6.97 -0.28 1.12 -7.91
0 H Spain Park (10- 4, 96.4) 5-21 -3.45 10.30 -0.28 1.12 -4.18
0 A Trussville ( 0-13, 86.1) 8- 7 -13.75 1.00 0.28 1.12 1.44
0 H Hoover (11- 4, 97.3) 1-15 -2.62 11.13 -0.28 1.12 -3.25
0 A Spain Park (10- 4, 96.4) 4-19 -3.45 10.30 0.28 1.12 -3.55
0 H Mountain Brook (14- 0, 99.9) 3-18 -0.00 13.75 -0.28 1.12 -0.32
0 A Hoover (11- 4, 97.3) 6-18 -2.62 11.13 0.28 1.12 -2.62
------
-40.65
|
winning pts = 2.2381 losing points = -42.8920
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------