Lexington
W-L: (15- 1) PR = 95.6662Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 224 H Aiken ( 5- 7, 79.5) 24- 1 228 H Academic Magnet ( 7- 8, 80.1) 22- 3 303 H White Knoll ( 2-11, 73.3) 24- 0 306 A Dutch Fork ( 7- 8, 83.4) 15- 4 308 A Bishop England (15- 2, 94.7) 14-10 311 H Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 21- 6 313 H Oceanside Collegiate (11- 0, 99.9) 9-17 317 H Spring Valley ( 7- 8, 71.7) 23- 4 320 A Irmo ( 0-16, 66.8) 23- 1 327 A Chapin (10- 7, 88.6) 17- 6 402 H Blythewood ( 4-10, 79.2) 23- 1 410 A River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 16- 5 414 H Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 15- 4 426 H Wando ( 9- 6, 90.5) 11- 8 429 H River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 19- 5 503 N Spartanburg (14- 3, 91.3) 12- 7
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
224 H Aiken 24- 1 23 17 0.00
228 H Academic Magnet 22- 3 19 16 0.00
303 H White Knoll 24- 0 24 23 0.00
306 A Dutch Fork 15- 4 11 12 0.00
308 A Bishop England 14-10 4 0 + 3.66
311 H Clover 21- 6 15 10 0.00
313 H Oceanside Collegiate 9-17 -8 -4 -1.39
317 H Spring Valley 23- 4 19 25 0.00
320 A Irmo 23- 1 22 28 0.00
327 A Chapin 17- 6 11 6 0.00
402 H Blythewood 23- 1 22 17 0.00
410 A River Bluff 16- 5 11 10 0.00
414 H Riverside 15- 4 11 10 0.00
426 H Wando 11- 8 3 6 - -2.00
429 H River Bluff 19- 5 14 11 0.00
503 N Spartanburg 12- 7 5 4 0.64
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 426 H Wando 11- 8 3 6 - -2.00 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 308 A Bishop England 14-10 4 0 + 3.66 |
Lexington Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | Lexington | insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) | Lexington | |
| Academic Magnet | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Aiken | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Ashley Hall | Lexington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Lexington | |
| Beaufort | Lexington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Lexington | |
| Bishop England | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Bluffton | Lexington | Lexington 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Blythewood | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Boiling Springs | Lexington | Lexington 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Byrnes | Lexington | Lexington 6- 0 vs 3- 3 | ||
| Carolina Forest | Lexington | Lexington 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Catawba Ridge | Lexington | Lexington 5- 0 vs 3- 2 | ||
| Chapin | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Christ Church Episcopal | Lexington | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) | Lexington | |
| Clover | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Dorman | Lexington | Lexington 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Dutch Fork | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Eastside | Lexington | Lexington 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Fort Mill | Lexington | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Lexington | |
| Fountain Inn | Lexington | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Lexington | |
| Greenville | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Heathwood Hall | Lexington | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Lexington | |
| Hillcrest | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Hilton Head | Lexington | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Lexington | |
| Irmo | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| James Island | Lexington | Lexington 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| JL Mann Academy | Lexington | insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) | Lexington | |
| Legion Collegiate Academ | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Lucy Beckham | Lexington | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | Lexington | |
| Mauldin | Lexington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Lexington | |
| May River | Lexington | Lexington 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Mid-Carolina | Lexington | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Lexington | |
| Myrtle Beach | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Nation Ford | Lexington | Lexington 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| North Myrtle Beach | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | ||
| Philip Simmons | Lexington | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Lexington | |
| Pinewood Prep | Lexington | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Lexington | |
| Porter-Gaud School | Lexington | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Lexington | |
| Ridge View | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| River Bluff | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Riverside | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Socastee | Lexington | Lexington 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Spartanburg | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Spring Valley | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| St James | Lexington | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Lexington | |
| St Josephs Catholic | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| TL Hanna | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Trinity Collegiate | Lexington | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Lexington | |
| Waccamaw | Lexington | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Lexington | |
| Wade Hampton | Lexington | Lexington 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Wando | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| West Ashley | Lexington | Lexington 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Westside | Lexington | Lexington 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| White Knoll | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Woodmont | Lexington | Lexington |
PowerWise = 55
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.58
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Aiken ( 5- 7, 79.5) 24- 1 -20.35 13.31 -0.62 0.85 10.77
0 H Academic Magne ( 7- 8, 80.1) 22- 3 -19.75 13.91 -0.62 0.85 11.28
0 H White Knoll ( 2-11, 73.3) 24- 0 -26.57 7.09 -0.62 0.85 5.49
0 A Dutch Fork ( 7- 8, 83.4) 15- 4 -16.49 17.18 0.62 0.85 15.11
0 A Bishop England (15- 2, 94.7) 14-10 -5.19 28.48 0.62 0.85 24.69
0 H Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 21- 6 -13.80 19.86 -0.62 0.85 16.33
0 H Oceanside Coll (11- 0, 99.9) 9-17 -0.00 33.67 -0.62 0.85 -0.53
0 H Spring Valley ( 7- 8, 71.7) 23- 4 -28.20 5.47 -0.62 0.85 4.11
0 A Irmo ( 0-16, 66.8) 23- 1 -33.08 1.00 0.62 0.85 1.37
0 A Chapin (10- 7, 88.6) 17- 6 -11.29 22.38 0.62 0.85 19.52
0 H Blythewood ( 4-10, 79.2) 23- 1 -20.70 12.97 -0.62 0.85 10.48
0 A River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 16- 5 -14.94 18.73 0.62 0.85 16.42
0 H Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 15- 4 -13.17 20.50 -0.62 0.85 16.87
0 H Wando ( 9- 6, 90.5) 11- 8 -9.36 24.30 -0.62 0.85 20.10
0 H River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 19- 5 -14.94 18.73 -0.62 0.85 15.37
0 N Spartanburg (14- 3, 91.3) 12- 7 -8.59 25.08 -0.00 0.85 21.28
------
208.68
|
winning pts = 209.2099 losing points = -0.5260
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------