---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 22:49 PDT

safe3step girls King Philip Regional 1
  
King Philip Regional  
W-L: (17- 5) PR = 93.0972

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 331 A Mansfield ( 8-11, 87.1) 12- 6 402 A Milford ( 7-10, 82.3) 15- 4 404 H Needham (12- 7, 91.7) 14- 8 407 H Foxborough (14- 6, 91.8) 8- 9 410 A Sharon (10-10, 84.4) 18- 5 414 H Mansfield ( 8-11, 87.1) 18- 8 416 A Attleboro ( 8-11, 86.5) 12- 5 421 H Bishop Feehan (12- 6, 90.7) 11- 7 423 H Grafton (12- 9, 91.2) 17-10 425 A Natick ( 6-13, 88.5) 13- 6 428 H Oliver Ames ( 6-12, 83.7) 21- 2 430 H Taunton ( 3-14, 78.9) 20- 0 505 A Canton ( 5-13, 84.2) 14- 3 507 H Stoughton ( 0-19, 75.1) 21- 1 509 H Attleboro ( 8-11, 86.5) 15- 5 512 H North Attleborough (12- 9, 85.6) 14- 4 514 A Walpole (25- 1, 99.8) 7-20 516 H Weymouth ( 6-15, 88.8) 20- 7 519 A Franklin (17- 3, 95.3) 6-13 521 A Medfield (22- 3, 95.3) 9-13 530 H Brookline (10-11, 88.8) 17- 6 603 A Westford Academy (19- 4, 96.0) 5-19

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   331 A Mansfield              12- 6       6     5           0.00
   402 A Milford                15- 4      11    10           0.00
   404 H Needham                14- 8       6     2    +      3.00
   407 H Foxborough              8- 9      -1     2    -     -2.83
   410 A Sharon                 18- 5      13     8           0.00
   414 H Mansfield              18- 8      10     7           0.00
   416 A Attleboro              12- 5       7     6           0.00
   421 H Bishop Feehan          11- 7       4     3           1.04
   423 H Grafton                17-10       7     2    +      2.53
   425 A Natick                 13- 6       7     4           1.01
   428 H Oliver Ames            21- 2      19    10           0.00
   430 H Taunton                20- 0      20    15           0.00
   505 A Canton                 14- 3      11     8           0.00
   507 H Stoughton              21- 1      20    19           0.00
   509 H Attleboro              15- 5      10     7           0.00
   512 H North Attleborough     14- 4      10     8           0.00
   514 A Walpole                 7-20     -13    -7           0.00
   516 H Weymouth               20- 7      13     5           0.13
   519 A Franklin                6-13      -7    -3    -     -2.25
   521 A Medfield                9-13      -4    -3          -1.20
   530 H Brookline              17- 6      11     5           0.15
   603 A Westford Academy        5-19     -14    -3          -1.57

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   407 H Foxborough              8- 9      -1     2    -     -2.83
   519 A Franklin                6-13      -7    -3    -     -2.25

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   404 H Needham                14- 8       6     2    +      3.00
   423 H Grafton                17-10       7     2    +      2.53

King Philip Regional Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Abington King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Acton-Boxborough King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 2) King Philip Regional
Agawam King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Algonquin King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Amherst-Pelham King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
AMSA Charter King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Andover HS Andover HS insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 1) Andover HS
Apponequet King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 0) King Philip Regional
Archbishop Williams King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Arlington Catholic King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Arlington HS King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Ashland King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Assabet Valley RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Attleboro King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Auburn King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Barnstable King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Bay Path RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Bedford HS King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Belchertown King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Bellingham King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) King Philip Regional
Belmont King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Beverly King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Billerica Memorial King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Bishop Feehan King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Bishop Fenwick King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Bishop Stang King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Blackstone Valley Tech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Boston Latin Academy King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Boston Latin School King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 3) King Philip Regional
Bourne King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Braintree King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   5- 1 vs 3- 4
Bridgewater-Raynham King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) King Philip Regional
Bristol County Agricultu King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Bristol-Plymouth RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Bromfield King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Brookline King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Burlington King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Cambridge Rindge/Latin King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Canton King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Cape Cod Academy King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Cape Cod Tech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Cardinal Spellman King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Central Catholic Central Catholic insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 0) Central Catholic
Chelmsford Chelmsford insuffient: ( 0- 0)( 1- 0) Chelmsford
Chicopee Comp King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Chicopee HS King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Cohasset Cohasset   Cohasset
Concord-Carlisle Concord-Carlisle tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Concord-Carlisle
Danvers King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Dartmouth King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Dedham King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Dennis-Yarmouth King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Dighton-Rehoboth King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Doherty Memorial King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Dover-Sherborn King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Dracut King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Duxbury Duxbury tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Duxbury
East Bridgewater King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
East Longmeadow East Longmeadow tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) East Longmeadow
Essex North Shore Tech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Everett King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Fairhaven King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Falmouth Academy King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Falmouth HS King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Fontbonne Academy King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Foxborough Foxborough Foxborough  
Framingham King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   3- 1 vs 0- 5
Franklin Franklin Franklin  
Georgetown King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Gloucester King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Grafton King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Granby King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Greater Lowell Tech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Greater New Bedford RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Groton-Dunstable King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Hamilton-Wenham King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Hampshire Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Hanover King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Haverhill King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Hingham Hingham Hingham   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Holliston King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Hoosac Valley King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Hopedale King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Hopkinton King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Hudson/Clinton King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Hull King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Ipswich Ipswich   Ipswich
Lee/Lenox/Monument Mtn King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Leominster King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Lexington HS Lexington HS tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Lexington HS
Lincoln-Sudbury Lincoln-Sudbury tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) Lincoln-Sudbury
Littleton King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Longmeadow Longmeadow tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Longmeadow
Lowell King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Lowell Catholic King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Lunenburg King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Lynnfield King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Malden King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Malden Catholic King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Manchester-Essex King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Mansfield King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Marblehead King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Marlborough King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Marshfield King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Marthas Vineyard King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Masconomet King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Mashpee King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
McCann Tech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Medfield Medfield Medfield  
Medford King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Medway King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
Melrose King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Methuen King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Middleboro King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Milford King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Milton HS King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   5- 1 vs 2- 5
Minnechaug Regional King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Monomoy King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Monson King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Montachusett RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Mount Greylock Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Mystic Valley Charter King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Nantucket King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Nashoba Regional King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Nashoba Valley Tech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Natick King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Nauset Regional King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
Needham King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
New Bedford King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Newburyport King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 0) King Philip Regional
Newton North King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 4- 2) King Philip Regional
Newton South King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 2) King Philip Regional
Nipmuc Regional King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
North Andover North Andover tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) North Andover
North Attleborough King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
North Middlesex King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 0) King Philip Regional
North Quincy King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
North Reading King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Northampton King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Northbridge King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Northeast RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Norton King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Norwell Norwell insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Norwell
Norwood King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
Notre Dame Hingham Notre Dame Hingham Notre Dame Hingham   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Notre Dame Worcester King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Oakmont Regional King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Old Colony RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Old Rochester Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Oliver Ames King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Peabody Veterans Memoria King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Pembroke King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Pentucket Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Pittsfield/Taconic King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Plymouth North King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Plymouth South King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Pope Francis King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Quincy King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) King Philip Regional
Reading Memorial Reading Memorial insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 2) Reading Memorial
Revere King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Rockland King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Salem King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Sandwich Sandwich   Sandwich
Saugus King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Scituate King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Seekonk King Philip Regional King Philip Regional   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Sharon King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Shawsheen Valley Tech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Shepherd Hill King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Shrewsbury King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 2- 0) King Philip Regional
Silver Lake King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Smith VoTech King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Somerset Berkley King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Somerville King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
South Hadley King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
South Shore RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Southeastern RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Springfield Central King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
St Bernards King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
St John Paul II King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
St Marys Lynn King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Stoneham King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Stoughton King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Sturgis Charter East King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Sturgis Charter West King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Swampscott King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Tahanto Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Tantasqua King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Taunton King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Tewksbury Memorial King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Tri-County RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Triton Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Tyngsborough King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Upper Cape Cod RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Ursuline Academy King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Wachusett King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Wahconah Regional King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Wakefield Memorial King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Walpole Walpole Walpole  
Waltham King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) King Philip Regional
Watertown King Philip Regional tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 0) King Philip Regional
Wayland King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 2) King Philip Regional
Wellesley Wellesley insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 5- 2) Wellesley
West Springfield King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Westborough King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Westfield King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Westford Academy Westford Academy Westford Academy  
Weston King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 3- 1) King Philip Regional
Westwood Westwood Westwood   2- 0 vs 0- 3
Weymouth King Philip Regional King Philip Regional  
Whitman-Hanson Regional King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) King Philip Regional
Whittier RVT King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Wilmington King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Winchester King Philip Regional tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 2) King Philip Regional
Winthrop King Philip Regional   King Philip Regional
Woburn Memorial King Philip Regional insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) King Philip Regional

PowerWise = 192


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 18.83

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Mansfield       ( 8-11, 87.1)    12- 6      -12.80      20.50       0.58         0.86            18.04
   0 A Milford         ( 7-10, 82.3)    15- 4      -17.59      15.71       0.58         0.86            13.94
   0 H Needham         (12- 7, 91.7)    14- 8       -8.23      25.07      -0.58         0.86            20.97
   0 H Foxborough      (14- 6, 91.8)     8- 9       -8.05      25.25      -0.58         0.86            -7.39
   0 A Sharon          (10-10, 84.4)    18- 5      -15.50      17.80       0.58         0.86            15.73
   0 H Mansfield       ( 8-11, 87.1)    18- 8      -12.80      20.50      -0.58         0.86            17.05
   0 A Attleboro       ( 8-11, 86.5)    12- 5      -13.39      19.91       0.58         0.86            17.53
   0 H Bishop Feehan   (12- 6, 90.7)    11- 7       -9.18      24.12      -0.58         0.86            20.15
   0 H Grafton         (12- 9, 91.2)    17-10       -8.69      24.61      -0.58         0.86            20.57
   0 A Natick          ( 6-13, 88.5)    13- 6      -11.37      21.93       0.58         0.86            19.26
   0 H Oliver Ames     ( 6-12, 83.7)    21- 2      -16.20      17.10      -0.58         0.86            14.14
   0 H Taunton         ( 3-14, 78.9)    20- 0      -21.01      12.29      -0.58         0.86            10.02
   0 A Canton          ( 5-13, 84.2)    14- 3      -15.66      17.64       0.58         0.86            15.59
   0 H Stoughton       ( 0-19, 75.1)    21- 1      -24.81       8.49      -0.58         0.86             6.77
   0 H Attleboro       ( 8-11, 86.5)    15- 5      -13.39      19.91      -0.58         0.86            16.55
   0 H North Attlebor  (12- 9, 85.6)    14- 4      -14.33      18.97      -0.58         0.86            15.74
   0 A Walpole         (25- 1, 99.8)     7-20       -0.13      33.17       0.58         0.86            -0.38
   0 H Weymouth        ( 6-15, 88.8)    20- 7      -11.09      22.21      -0.58         0.86            18.51
   0 A Franklin        (17- 3, 95.3)     6-13       -4.62      28.67       0.58         0.86            -3.47
   0 A Medfield        (22- 3, 95.3)     9-13       -4.58      28.72       0.58         0.86            -3.42
   0 H Brookline       (10-11, 88.8)    17- 6      -11.08      22.22      -0.58         0.86            18.53
   0 A Westford Acade  (19- 4, 96.0)     5-19       -3.95      29.35       0.58         0.86            -2.88
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       261.55

winning pts = 279.0882 losing points = -17.5378

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------