Kenosha
W-L: ( 8- 7) PR = 89.8790
Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score
404 H Waukesha ( 3-14, 87.8) 11- 5
411 A Cedarburg ( 8- 5, 89.5) 6-11
416 A Oak Creek ( 3-11, 83.0) 14- 3
417 H Janesville ( 4-11, 84.0) 21- 5
428 A University Milwaukee (16- 2, 96.8) 13-21
501 H Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 19- 6
505 A Franklin ( 5-10, 87.7) 12-13
507 H Oak Creek ( 3-11, 83.0) 18- 3
512 H Franklin ( 5-10, 87.7) 19-10
512 H Franklin ( 5-10, 87.7) 21-10
513 A Muskego (10-10, 91.9) 9-13
519 H University Milwaukee (16- 2, 96.8) 6-16
520 A Mukwonago (13- 6, 92.9) 11-12
521 H Wauwatosa ( 1-16, 81.9) 15- 4
529 H Oconomowoc ( 8- 9, 91.0) 10-11
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
404 H Waukesha 11- 5 6 3 + 2.29
411 A Cedarburg 6-11 -5 0 -- -4.77
416 A Oak Creek 14- 3 11 6 0.00
417 H Janesville 21- 5 16 6 0.00
428 A University Milwaukee 13-21 -8 -8 0.00
501 H Homestead 19- 6 13 7 0.00
505 A Franklin 12-13 -1 2 - -2.61
507 H Oak Creek 18- 3 15 7 0.00
512 H Franklin 19-10 9 3 + 2.18
512 H Franklin 21-10 11 3 + 2.18
513 A Muskego 9-13 -4 -3 -1.33
519 H University Milwaukee 6-16 -10 -6 0.00
520 A Mukwonago 11-12 -1 -4 + 2.59
521 H Wauwatosa 15- 4 11 9 0.00
529 H Oconomowoc 10-11 -1 0 -0.53
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
411 A Cedarburg 6-11 -5 0 -- -4.77
505 A Franklin 12-13 -1 2 - -2.61
|
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
404 H Waukesha 11- 5 6 3 + 2.29
512 H Franklin 19-10 9 3 + 2.18
512 H Franklin 21-10 11 3 + 2.18
520 A Mukwonago 11-12 -1 -4 + 2.59
|
Kenosha Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent |
Who Gets the Point?
| Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
Appleton |
Kenosha |
|
 
| Kenosha |
Arrowhead |
Arrowhead |
|
Arrowhead   4- 1 vs 1- 4 |
|
Bay Port |
Kenosha |
|
 
| Kenosha |
Brookfield |
Brookfield |
|
insuffient: ( 4- 3)( 5- 1) |
Brookfield |
Cedarburg |
Cedarburg |
Cedarburg |
 
| |
Central Wisconsin |
Kenosha |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Kenosha |
De Pere |
Kenosha |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Kenosha |
DeForest |
Kenosha |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Kenosha |
Divine Savior |
Divine Savior |
|
tied - ( 4- 6) ( 4- 5) |
Divine Savior |
Franklin |
Kenosha |
Kenosha |
 
| |
Hamilton |
Kenosha |
|
Kenosha   3- 1 vs 1- 3 |
|
Homestead |
Kenosha |
Kenosha |
 
| |
Hudson |
Hudson |
|
insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) |
Hudson |
Janesville |
Kenosha |
Kenosha |
 
| |
Kettle Moraine |
Kettle Moraine |
|
Kettle Moraine   5- 2 vs 3- 4 |
|
Kimberly |
Kenosha |
|
 
| Kenosha |
Madison |
Madison |
|
tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 2) |
Madison |
Middleton |
Kenosha |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Kenosha |
Mukwonago |
Mukwonago |
Mukwonago |
 
| |
Muskego |
Muskego |
Muskego |
 
| |
Neenah |
Kenosha |
|
 
| Kenosha |
Notre Dame |
Notre Dame |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Notre Dame |
Oak Creek |
Kenosha |
Kenosha |
 
| |
Oconomowoc |
Oconomowoc |
Oconomowoc |
 
| |
Oregon |
Oregon |
|
tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 0) |
Oregon |
Pulaski |
Kenosha |
|
insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) |
Kenosha |
Sun Prairie |
Kenosha |
|
Kenosha   2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
|
Superior |
Kenosha |
|
 
| Kenosha |
University Milwaukee |
University Milwaukee |
University Milwaukee |
 
| |
Verona |
Kenosha |
|
tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) |
Kenosha |
Waukesha |
Kenosha |
Kenosha |
 
| |
Waunakee |
Kenosha |
|
tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) |
Kenosha |
Wauwatosa |
Kenosha |
Kenosha |
 
| |
West Bend |
Kenosha |
|
insuffient: ( 2- 2)( 1- 2) |
Kenosha |
Whitefish Bay |
Whitefish Bay |
|
Whitefish Bay   6- 1 vs 3- 5 |
|
PowerWise = 21

division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 15.72
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Waukesha ( 3-14, 87.8) 11- 5 -12.12 8.78 -0.60 1.05 8.57
0 A Cedarburg ( 8- 5, 89.5) 6-11 -10.40 10.51 0.60 1.05 -10.26
0 A Oak Creek ( 3-11, 83.0) 14- 3 -16.90 4.01 0.60 1.05 4.83
0 H Janesville ( 4-11, 84.0) 21- 5 -15.88 5.02 -0.60 1.05 4.63
0 A University Mil (16- 2, 96.8) 13-21 -3.07 17.83 0.60 1.05 -2.59
0 H Homestead ( 2-12, 83.6) 19- 6 -16.32 4.58 -0.60 1.05 4.17
0 A Franklin ( 5-10, 87.7) 12-13 -12.24 8.66 0.60 1.05 -12.19
0 H Oak Creek ( 3-11, 83.0) 18- 3 -16.90 4.01 -0.60 1.05 3.57
0 H Franklin ( 5-10, 87.7) 19-10 -12.24 8.66 -0.60 1.05 8.45
0 H Franklin ( 5-10, 87.7) 21-10 -12.24 8.66 -0.60 1.05 8.45
0 A Muskego (10-10, 91.9) 9-13 -7.96 12.94 0.60 1.05 -7.71
0 H University Mil (16- 2, 96.8) 6-16 -3.07 17.83 -0.60 1.05 -3.86
0 A Mukwonago (13- 6, 92.9) 11-12 -7.03 13.87 0.60 1.05 -6.74
0 H Wauwatosa ( 1-16, 81.9) 15- 4 -17.98 2.92 -0.60 1.05 2.43
0 H Oconomowoc ( 8- 9, 91.0) 10-11 -8.95 11.96 -0.60 1.05 -10.01
------
-8.27
|
winning pts = 45.0868 losing points = -53.3524
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------