Kennebunk
W-L: (16- 0) PR = 99.9000Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 417 H Windham (15- 3, 97.3) 10- 6 422 H Greely ( 9- 8, 95.2) 10- 1 429 A Cape Elizabeth ( 8- 9, 94.5) 15- 1 502 H Portland ( 3-11, 87.9) 17- 2 506 H Yarmouth ( 9- 7, 95.0) 16- 7 513 A North Yarmouth Academy ( 7- 8, 93.7) 16- 2 515 H Marshwood (11- 5, 96.3) 13- 7 517 H Biddeford ( 4-10, 89.5) 19- 2 519 A Scarborough ( 7- 8, 93.2) 16- 6 522 A Falmouth (12- 5, 95.9) 10- 8 527 A Massabesic ( 8- 7, 93.9) 14- 5 530 H Cheverus (12- 5, 95.0) 14- 8 602 H Gorham (10- 5, 95.0) 14- 7 605 A Thornton Academy ( 9- 7, 95.7) 14-11 614 A Thornton Academy ( 9- 7, 95.7) 11- 7 618 H Cape Elizabeth ( 8- 9, 94.5) 12- 6
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
417 H Windham 10- 6 4 3 0.86
422 H Greely 10- 1 9 5 0.00
429 A Cape Elizabeth 15- 1 14 5 0.10
502 H Portland 17- 2 15 12 0.00
506 H Yarmouth 16- 7 9 5 0.00
513 A North Yarmouth Academy 16- 2 14 6 0.00
515 H Marshwood 13- 7 6 4 0.85
517 H Biddeford 19- 2 17 11 0.00
519 A Scarborough 16- 6 10 6 0.00
522 A Falmouth 10- 8 2 4 -1.52
527 A Massabesic 14- 5 9 5 0.00
530 H Cheverus 14- 8 6 5 0.00
602 H Gorham 14- 7 7 5 0.00
605 A Thornton Academy 14-11 3 4 -0.64
614 A Thornton Academy 11- 7 4 4 0.36
618 H Cape Elizabeth 12- 6 6 6 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Kennebunk Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangor | Kennebunk | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Kennebunk | |
| Biddeford | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Bonny Eagle | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Brewer/Hampden | Kennebunk | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Kennebunk | |
| Brunswick | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Camden Hills Regional | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Cape Elizabeth | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Cheverus | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Cony | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Deering | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Edward Little | Kennebunk | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Kennebunk | |
| Erskine Academy | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Falmouth | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Freeport | Kennebunk | tied - ( 5- 0) ( 5- 0) | Kennebunk | |
| Fryeburg Academy | Kennebunk | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Kennebunk | |
| Gardiner-Hall-Dale | Kennebunk | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Kennebunk | |
| Gorham | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Gray-New Gloucester/Pola | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Greely | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Houlton | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Lake Region | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Lewiston | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Lincoln Academy | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Maranacook/Winthrop | Kennebunk | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Kennebunk | |
| Marshwood | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Massabesic | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| MCI/Nokomis | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Messalonskee | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Morse-Boothbay | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Mount Ararat | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Mount Blue | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Noble | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| North Yarmouth Academy | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Oceanside | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Oxford Hills Comp | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 4- 0 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Portland | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Sanford | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 5- 0 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Scarborough | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| South Portland | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 7- 0 vs 2- 5 | ||
| St Dominic Academy | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Thornton Academy | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Traip Academy | Kennebunk | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Kennebunk | |
| Waynflete School | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 4- 0 vs 1- 3 | ||
| Wells | Kennebunk | insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) | Kennebunk | |
| Westbrook | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Windham | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Winslow/Lawrence | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Yarmouth | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| York | Kennebunk | Kennebunk 7- 0 vs 1- 6 |
PowerWise = 49
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 14.76
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Windham (15- 3, 97.3) 10- 6 -2.62 16.13 -0.51 0.98 15.36
0 H Greely ( 9- 8, 95.2) 10- 1 -4.69 14.06 -0.51 0.98 13.33
0 A Cape Elizabeth ( 8- 9, 94.5) 15- 1 -5.42 13.33 0.51 0.98 13.62
0 H Portland ( 3-11, 87.9) 17- 2 -11.97 6.78 -0.51 0.98 6.16
0 H Yarmouth ( 9- 7, 95.0) 16- 7 -4.93 13.82 -0.51 0.98 13.09
0 A North Yarmouth ( 7- 8, 93.7) 16- 2 -6.23 12.52 0.51 0.98 12.82
0 H Marshwood (11- 5, 96.3) 13- 7 -3.64 15.11 -0.51 0.98 14.36
0 H Biddeford ( 4-10, 89.5) 19- 2 -10.39 8.36 -0.51 0.98 7.72
0 A Scarborough ( 7- 8, 93.2) 16- 6 -6.73 12.02 0.51 0.98 12.33
0 A Falmouth (12- 5, 95.9) 10- 8 -4.04 14.71 0.51 0.98 14.98
0 A Massabesic ( 8- 7, 93.9) 14- 5 -5.97 12.78 0.51 0.98 13.08
0 H Cheverus (12- 5, 95.0) 14- 8 -4.90 13.84 -0.51 0.98 13.11
0 H Gorham (10- 5, 95.0) 14- 7 -4.90 13.85 -0.51 0.98 13.12
0 A Thornton Acade ( 9- 7, 95.7) 14-11 -4.16 14.59 0.51 0.98 14.86
0 A Thornton Acade ( 9- 7, 95.7) 11- 7 -4.16 14.59 0.51 0.98 14.86
0 H Cape Elizabeth ( 8- 9, 94.5) 12- 6 -5.42 13.33 -0.51 0.98 12.61
------
205.43
|
winning pts = 205.4267 losing points = 0.0000
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------