---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 22:45 PDT

safe3step girls Huntley 1
  
Huntley               
W-L: (19- 4) PR = 91.2410

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 401 A Schaumburg ( 9-11, 82.2) 15- 0 407 H Lake Forest HS (15- 5, 93.9) 4-15 409 H Burlington Central ( 5-10, 75.1) 25- 0 411 H McHenry ( 0-10, 69.6) 18- 2 412 H Sandburg (12- 6, 88.1) 15- 6 414 A Mundelein ( 5-13, 76.8) 22- 4 416 H Hampshire ( 8- 8, 77.0) 22- 4 418 A Crystal Lake (19- 3, 94.2) 11-12 419 H Geneva ( 3-13, 79.0) 22- 1 421 A Montini Catholic (10-11, 87.6) 11- 6 424 A St Charles ( 9- 7, 88.0) 12-11 428 A Minooka ( 0-18, 73.6) 22- 2 430 A Burlington Central ( 5-10, 75.1) 25- 0 502 H Hersey (14- 9, 88.7) 11- 7 505 A Downers Grove Co-Op (20- 3, 93.1) 13-12 507 A McHenry ( 0-10, 69.6) 22- 1 509 A Hampshire ( 8- 8, 77.0) 19- 3 513 H Crystal Lake (19- 3, 94.2) 8-13 515 A Carmel Catholic (15- 6, 88.4) 8- 7 519 A Conant (10-10, 83.6) 21- 4 526 H Burlington Central ( 5-10, 75.1) 26- 1 528 N Fremd (14- 5, 86.3) 16- 4 530 A Crystal Lake (19- 3, 94.2) 8-14

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   401 A Schaumburg             15- 0      15     9           0.00
   407 H Lake Forest HS          4-15     -11    -2    -     -2.82
   409 H Burlington Central     25- 0      25    17           0.00
   411 H McHenry                18- 2      16    22           0.00
   412 H Sandburg               15- 6       9     4           1.40
   414 A Mundelein              22- 4      18    14           0.00
   416 H Hampshire              22- 4      18    15           0.00
   418 A Crystal Lake           11-12      -1    -3    +      2.42
   419 H Geneva                 22- 1      21    13           0.00
   421 A Montini Catholic       11- 6       5     3           1.84
   424 A St Charles             12-11       1     3          -1.73
   428 A Minooka                22- 2      20    17           0.00
   430 A Burlington Central     25- 0      25    16           0.00
   502 H Hersey                 11- 7       4     3           0.99
   505 A Downers Grove Co-Op    13-12       1    -2    +      3.40
   507 A McHenry                22- 1      21    21           0.00
   509 A Hampshire              19- 3      16    14           0.00
   513 H Crystal Lake            8-13      -5    -2    -     -2.58
   515 A Carmel Catholic         8- 7       1     2          -1.35
   519 A Conant                 21- 4      17     7           0.00
   526 H Burlington Central     26- 1      25    17           0.00
   528 N Fremd                  16- 4      12     5           0.08
   530 A Crystal Lake            8-14      -6    -3          -1.58

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   407 H Lake Forest HS          4-15     -11    -2    -     -2.82
   513 H Crystal Lake            8-13      -5    -2    -     -2.58

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   418 A Crystal Lake           11-12      -1    -3    +      2.42
   505 A Downers Grove Co-Op    13-12       1    -2    +      3.40

Huntley Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Barrington Barrington insuffient: ( 6- 0)( 5- 1) Barrington
Benet Academy Benet Academy insuffient: ( 6- 2)( 5- 3) Benet Academy
Bloomington Huntley   Huntley
Buffalo Grove Huntley Huntley   5- 0 vs 0- 6
Burlington Central Huntley Huntley  
Carmel Catholic Huntley Huntley  
Conant Huntley Huntley  
Crystal Lake Crystal Lake Crystal Lake  
Deerfield Huntley Huntley   4- 0 vs 1- 3
DePaul Prep Huntley tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) Huntley
Downers Grove Co-Op Huntley Huntley  
Dunlap Huntley insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Huntley
Edwardsville Huntley   Huntley
Elk Grove Huntley Huntley   3- 0 vs 0- 4
Evanston Evanston insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 2- 0) Evanston
Fenwick Huntley insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 2) Huntley
Fremd Huntley Huntley  
Geneva Huntley Huntley  
Glenbard West Huntley insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) Huntley
Glenbrook North Huntley Huntley   3- 2 vs 0- 5
Glenbrook South Huntley tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Huntley
Gurnee Warren Huntley Huntley   3- 1 vs 1- 4
Hampshire Huntley Huntley  
Hersey Huntley Huntley  
Highland Park Huntley   Huntley
Hinsdale Central Hinsdale Central insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 1) Hinsdale Central
Hoffman Estates Huntley Huntley   3- 0 vs 0- 4
Jones Huntley   Huntley
Kenwood Huntley   Huntley
Lake Forest Academy Huntley insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Huntley
Lake Forest HS Lake Forest HS Lake Forest HS  
Lake Zurich Huntley insuffient: ( 5- 1)( 4- 2) Huntley
Lane Tech Huntley tied - ( 0- 0) ( 0- 1) Huntley
Latin School Huntley Huntley   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Libertyville Huntley Huntley   3- 1 vs 1- 4
Lincoln Park Huntley   Huntley
Lincoln-Way Co-Op Huntley Huntley   4- 1 vs 2- 3
Lockport Lockport insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 2) Lockport
Loyola Academy Loyola Academy Loyola Academy   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Lyons Township Huntley Huntley   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Maine South Maine South tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) Maine South
Marist Marist insuffient: ( 4- 0)( 3- 1) Marist
Mather Huntley   Huntley
McHenry Huntley Huntley  
Metea Valley Huntley Huntley   5- 0 vs 2- 3
Minooka Huntley Huntley  
Montini Catholic Huntley Huntley  
Mother McAuley Huntley Huntley   4- 0 vs 1- 3
Mundelein Huntley Huntley  
Naperville Central Huntley Huntley   5- 0 vs 3- 1
Naperville North Huntley Huntley   4- 0 vs 2- 2
Nazareth Academy Huntley insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Huntley
Neuqua Valley Huntley Huntley   7- 0 vs 2- 5
New Trier New Trier insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) New Trier
Normal Community Huntley insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) Huntley
Northside Prep Huntley   Huntley
Oak Park-River Forest Oak Park-River Forest insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Oak Park-River Forest
OFallon Huntley tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Huntley
Palatine Huntley insuffient: ( 5- 0)( 4- 2) Huntley
Payton College Prep Huntley   Huntley
Plainfield East Huntley Huntley   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Prospect Huntley insuffient: ( 4- 1)( 3- 3) Huntley
Providence Catholic Huntley insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Huntley
Regina Dominican Huntley insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Huntley
Resurrection Huntley   Huntley
Riverside-Brookfield Huntley Huntley   2- 0 vs 0- 2
Rolling Meadows Huntley Huntley   5- 0 vs 0- 6
Rosary Huntley Huntley   2- 0 vs 0- 3
Sandburg Huntley Huntley  
Schaumburg Huntley Huntley  
St Charles Huntley Huntley  
St Francis Huntley Huntley   5- 0 vs 2- 3
St Ignatius Huntley tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Huntley
St Laurence Huntley insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Huntley
St Viator Huntley insuffient: ( 3- 0)( 2- 1) Huntley
Stevenson Huntley Huntley   3- 1 vs 1- 4
Streamwood Huntley Huntley   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Taft HS Huntley   Huntley
Trinity Huntley insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Huntley
Vernon Hills Huntley insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Huntley
Washington Huntley Huntley   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Wheaton United Huntley Huntley   6- 0 vs 3- 3
Whitney Young Huntley   Huntley
York York tied - ( 6- 0) ( 6- 0) York

PowerWise = 71


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 16.92

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Schaumburg      ( 9-11, 82.2)    15- 0      -17.74      20.87       0.50         0.74            15.72
   0 H Lake Forest HS  (15- 5, 93.9)     4-15       -5.97      32.64      -0.50         0.74            -4.76
   0 H Burlington Cen  ( 5-10, 75.1)    25- 0      -24.84      13.77      -0.50         0.74             9.76
   0 H McHenry         ( 0-10, 69.6)    18- 2      -30.26       8.35      -0.50         0.74             5.77
   0 H Sandburg        (12- 6, 88.1)    15- 6      -11.76      26.85      -0.50         0.74            19.38
   0 A Mundelein       ( 5-13, 76.8)    22- 4      -23.14      15.47       0.50         0.74            11.75
   0 H Hampshire       ( 8- 8, 77.0)    22- 4      -22.93      15.68      -0.50         0.74            11.16
   0 A Crystal Lake    (19- 3, 94.2)    11-12       -5.74      32.87       0.50         0.74            -3.85
   0 H Geneva          ( 3-13, 79.0)    22- 1      -20.85      17.76      -0.50         0.74            12.69
   0 A Montini Cathol  (10-11, 87.6)    11- 6      -12.32      26.29       0.50         0.74            19.70
   0 A St Charles      ( 9- 7, 88.0)    12-11      -11.89      26.72       0.50         0.74            20.02
   0 A Minooka         ( 0-18, 73.6)    22- 2      -26.30      12.31       0.50         0.74             9.43
   0 A Burlington Cen  ( 5-10, 75.1)    25- 0      -24.84      13.77       0.50         0.74            10.49
   0 H Hersey          (14- 9, 88.7)    11- 7      -11.17      27.44      -0.50         0.74            19.81
   0 A Downers Grove   (20- 3, 93.1)    13-12       -6.76      31.85       0.50         0.74            23.80
   0 A McHenry         ( 0-10, 69.6)    22- 1      -30.26       8.35       0.50         0.74             6.51
   0 A Hampshire       ( 8- 8, 77.0)    19- 3      -22.93      15.68       0.50         0.74            11.90
   0 H Crystal Lake    (19- 3, 94.2)     8-13       -5.74      32.87      -0.50         0.74            -4.59
   0 A Carmel Catholi  (15- 6, 88.4)     8- 7      -11.51      27.10       0.50         0.74            20.30
   0 A Conant          (10-10, 83.6)    21- 4      -16.31      22.30       0.50         0.74            16.77
   0 H Burlington Cen  ( 5-10, 75.1)    26- 1      -24.84      13.77      -0.50         0.74             9.76
   0 N Fremd           (14- 5, 86.3)    16- 4      -13.58      25.03      -0.00         0.74            18.41
   0 A Crystal Lake    (19- 3, 94.2)     8-14       -5.74      32.87       0.50         0.74            -3.85
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       256.08

winning pts = 273.1405 losing points = -17.0623

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------