Gorham
W-L: (10- 5) PR = 94.9989Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 419 H Cape Elizabeth ( 8- 9, 94.5) 14- 9 430 H North Yarmouth Academy ( 7- 8, 93.7) 10- 7 502 H Falmouth (12- 5, 95.9) 10- 3 508 A Portland ( 3-11, 87.9) 14- 8 509 A Scarborough ( 7- 8, 93.2) 4- 7 513 A Wells (14- 2, 94.7) 8- 5 516 H Noble ( 2-12, 85.1) 17- 6 519 H Westbrook ( 6- 8, 88.4) 15- 5 523 A Sanford ( 8- 7, 92.5) 15- 8 527 H Biddeford ( 4-10, 89.5) 19- 5 530 H Marshwood (11- 5, 96.3) 6-15 602 A Kennebunk (16- 0, 99.9) 7-14 603 A Windham (15- 3, 97.3) 6-16 605 A Bonny Eagle ( 5-10, 89.3) 12- 5 611 H Cape Elizabeth ( 8- 9, 94.5) 11-17
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
419 H Cape Elizabeth 14- 9 5 1 + 3.97
430 H North Yarmouth Academy 10- 7 3 2 1.16
502 H Falmouth 10- 3 7 0 ++ 5.35
508 A Portland 14- 8 6 7 0.00
509 A Scarborough 4- 7 -3 1 -- -4.31
513 A Wells 8- 5 3 0 + 3.26
516 H Noble 17- 6 11 10 0.00
519 H Westbrook 15- 5 10 7 0.00
523 A Sanford 15- 8 7 2 + 3.06
527 H Biddeford 19- 5 14 6 0.00
530 H Marshwood 6-15 -9 -1 -- -4.25
602 A Kennebunk 7-14 -7 -5 0.00
603 A Windham 6-16 -10 -3 - -2.21
605 A Bonny Eagle 12- 5 7 5 0.00
611 H Cape Elizabeth 11-17 -6 1 --- -6.03
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 611 H Cape Elizabeth 11-17 -6 1 --- -6.03 509 A Scarborough 4- 7 -3 1 -- -4.31 530 H Marshwood 6-15 -9 -1 -- -4.25 603 A Windham 6-16 -10 -3 - -2.21 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 502 H Falmouth 10- 3 7 0 ++ 5.35 419 H Cape Elizabeth 14- 9 5 1 + 3.97 513 A Wells 8- 5 3 0 + 3.26 523 A Sanford 15- 8 7 2 + 3.06 |
Gorham Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bangor | Gorham | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Gorham | |
| Biddeford | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Bonny Eagle | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Brewer/Hampden | Gorham | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Gorham | |
| Brunswick | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Camden Hills Regional | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Cape Elizabeth | Gorham | tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) | Gorham | |
| Cheverus | Gorham | tied - ( 3- 5) ( 3- 4) | Gorham | |
| Cony | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Deering | Gorham | Gorham 6- 1 vs 0- 7 | ||
| Edward Little | Gorham | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Gorham | |
| Erskine Academy | Gorham | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Gorham | |
| Falmouth | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Freeport | Freeport | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 0) | Freeport | |
| Fryeburg Academy | Gorham | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Gorham | |
| Gardiner-Hall-Dale | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Gray-New Gloucester/Pola | Gorham | Gorham 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Greely | Gorham | Gorham 3- 3 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Houlton | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Kennebunk | Kennebunk | Kennebunk | ||
| Lake Region | Gorham | Gorham 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Lewiston | Gorham | Gorham 2- 2 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Lincoln Academy | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Maranacook/Winthrop | Gorham | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Gorham | |
| Marshwood | Marshwood | Marshwood | ||
| Massabesic | Gorham | tied - ( 6- 4) ( 6- 3) | Gorham | |
| MCI/Nokomis | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Messalonskee | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Morse-Boothbay | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Mount Ararat | Mount Ararat | Mount Ararat | ||
| Mount Blue | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Noble | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| North Yarmouth Academy | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Oceanside | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Oxford Hills Comp | Gorham | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Gorham | |
| Portland | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Sanford | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Scarborough | Scarborough | Scarborough | ||
| South Portland | Gorham | Gorham 6- 2 vs 4- 4 | ||
| St Dominic Academy | Gorham | Gorham 3- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Thornton Academy | Thornton Academy | insuffient: ( 5- 5)( 4- 5) | Thornton Academy | |
| Traip Academy | Gorham | Gorham 5- 0 vs 3- 2 | ||
| Waynflete School | Gorham | insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) | Gorham | |
| Wells | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Westbrook | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Windham | Windham | Windham | ||
| Winslow/Lawrence | Gorham | Gorham | ||
| Yarmouth | Gorham | insuffient: ( 2- 4)( 1- 4) | Gorham | |
| York | Gorham | Gorham 4- 2 vs 1- 4 |
PowerWise = 42
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 14.76
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Cape Elizabeth ( 8- 9, 94.5) 14- 9 -5.42 13.33 -0.51 0.98 12.61
0 H North Yarmouth ( 7- 8, 93.7) 10- 7 -6.23 12.52 -0.51 0.98 11.81
0 H Falmouth (12- 5, 95.9) 10- 3 -4.04 14.71 -0.51 0.98 13.97
0 A Portland ( 3-11, 87.9) 14- 8 -11.97 6.78 0.51 0.98 7.18
0 A Scarborough ( 7- 8, 93.2) 4- 7 -6.73 12.02 0.51 0.98 -6.12
0 A Wells (14- 2, 94.7) 8- 5 -5.15 13.60 0.51 0.98 13.88
0 H Noble ( 2-12, 85.1) 17- 6 -14.82 3.92 -0.51 0.98 3.36
0 H Westbrook ( 6- 8, 88.4) 15- 5 -11.53 7.21 -0.51 0.98 6.59
0 A Sanford ( 8- 7, 92.5) 15- 8 -7.35 11.39 0.51 0.98 11.72
0 H Biddeford ( 4-10, 89.5) 19- 5 -10.39 8.36 -0.51 0.98 7.72
0 H Marshwood (11- 5, 96.3) 6-15 -3.64 15.11 -0.51 0.98 -4.09
0 A Kennebunk (16- 0, 99.9) 7-14 -0.00 18.75 0.51 0.98 -0.51
0 A Windham (15- 3, 97.3) 6-16 -2.62 16.13 0.51 0.98 -2.07
0 A Bonny Eagle ( 5-10, 89.3) 12- 5 -10.59 8.16 0.51 0.98 8.54
0 H Cape Elizabeth ( 8- 9, 94.5) 11-17 -5.42 13.33 -0.51 0.98 -5.84
------
78.75
|
winning pts = 97.3703 losing points = -18.6195
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------