Goffstown
W-L: ( 6-11) PR = 87.0121Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 414 H Winnacunnet (19- 1, 95.7) 5-11 416 H Merrimack (14- 2, 91.0) 10-12 421 H Spaulding ( 2-14, 78.6) 27- 3 423 A Oyster River-Newmarket ( 9- 7, 87.7) 8- 9 425 A Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 6-18 428 H Hollis-Brookline ( 8-10, 88.5) 5- 8 502 H Pinkerton Academy (15- 3, 95.7) 4-20 507 A Alvirne ( 1-14, 76.4) 14- 7 509 H Keene-Monadnock ( 3- 9, 79.3) 18- 4 512 A Hanover (11- 8, 90.6) 2-18 513 A Winnacunnet (19- 1, 95.7) 3-17 514 A Timberlane (10- 6, 89.7) 9-16 516 H Merrimack Valley (12- 5, 90.1) 7- 9 519 A Manchester Memorial ( 1-15, 76.5) 13- 7 527 H Kennett ( 5- 9, 83.9) 13- 9 528 A Kingswood ( 6-10, 83.8) 13-10 529 H Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 8-12
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
414 H Winnacunnet 5-11 -6 -9 0.00
416 H Merrimack 10-12 -2 -4 1.79
421 H Spaulding 27- 3 24 9 0.00
423 A Oyster River-Newmarket 8- 9 -1 -1 -0.16
425 A Exeter HS 6-18 -12 -7 0.00
428 H Hollis-Brookline 5- 8 -3 -1 -1.71
502 H Pinkerton Academy 4-20 -16 -9 0.00
507 A Alvirne 14- 7 7 10 0.00
509 H Keene-Monadnock 18- 4 14 8 0.00
512 A Hanover 2-18 -16 -4 -1.24
513 A Winnacunnet 3-17 -14 -9 0.00
514 A Timberlane 9-16 -7 -3 - -2.11
516 H Merrimack Valley 7- 9 -2 -3 0.89
519 A Manchester Memorial 13- 7 6 10 0.00
527 H Kennett 13- 9 4 3 0.70
528 A Kingswood 13-10 3 3 -0.08
529 H Bedford 8-12 -4 -6 1.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 514 A Timberlane 9-16 -7 -3 - -2.11 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* |
Goffstown Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alvirne | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Bedford | Bedford | Bedford | ||
| Belmont | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Bishop Brady | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin | Bishop Guertin 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Bow | Bow | Bow | ||
| Campbell | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | Coe-Brown | ||
| Concord | Concord | tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) | Concord | |
| Concord Christian | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| ConVal | Goffstown | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Goffstown | |
| Derryfield | Derryfield | Derryfield | ||
| Dover | Dover | Dover 3- 3 vs 1- 5 | ||
| Exeter HS | Exeter HS | Exeter HS | ||
| Gilford | Gilford | Gilford | ||
| Hanover | Hanover | Hanover | ||
| Hollis-Brookline | Hollis-Brookline | Hollis-Brookline | ||
| Hopkinton | Hopkinton | Hopkinton | ||
| Inter-Lakes-Moultonborou | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| John Stark | John Stark | John Stark | ||
| Kearsarge | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Keene-Monadnock | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Kennett | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Kingswood | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Laconia | Laconia | Laconia | ||
| Lebanon | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Londonderry | Londonderry | tied - ( 0- 4) ( 0- 4) | Londonderry | |
| Manchester Central-West | Goffstown | tied - ( 2- 3) ( 2- 3) | Goffstown | |
| Manchester Memorial | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Merrimack | Merrimack | Merrimack | ||
| Merrimack Valley | Merrimack Valley | Merrimack Valley | ||
| Milford | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Nashua North | Goffstown | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | Goffstown | |
| Nashua South | Nashua South | Nashua South 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | Oyster River-Newmarket | ||
| Pelham | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Pembroke Academy | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | Pinkerton Academy | ||
| Plymouth | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Portsmouth | Portsmouth | Portsmouth 5- 0 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Salem | Salem | tied - ( 1- 4) ( 1- 4) | Salem | |
| Souhegan | Souhegan | insuffient: ( 0- 3)( 1- 2) | Souhegan | |
| Spaulding | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | St Thomas Aquinas | ||
| Timberlane | Timberlane | Timberlane | ||
| Trinity Manchester | Goffstown | Goffstown | ||
| Windham | Windham | insuffient: ( 0- 4)( 1- 3) | Windham | |
| Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet | Winnacunnet |
PowerWise = 21
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 15.96
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Winnacunnet (19- 1, 95.7) 5-11 -4.17 23.76 -0.16 0.94 -4.06
0 H Merrimack (14- 2, 91.0) 10-12 -8.95 18.98 -0.16 0.94 -8.54
0 H Spaulding ( 2-14, 78.6) 27- 3 -21.26 6.66 -0.16 0.94 6.11
0 A Oyster River-N ( 9- 7, 87.7) 8- 9 -12.20 15.73 0.16 0.94 -11.31
0 A Exeter HS (15- 5, 93.5) 6-18 -6.42 21.51 0.16 0.94 -5.88
0 H Hollis-Brookli ( 8-10, 88.5) 5- 8 -11.44 16.49 -0.16 0.94 -10.88
0 H Pinkerton Acad (15- 3, 95.7) 4-20 -4.17 23.76 -0.16 0.94 -4.06
0 A Alvirne ( 1-14, 76.4) 14- 7 -23.49 4.44 0.16 0.94 4.31
0 H Keene-Monadnoc ( 3- 9, 79.3) 18- 4 -20.65 7.28 -0.16 0.94 6.69
0 A Hanover (11- 8, 90.6) 2-18 -9.29 18.64 0.16 0.94 -8.57
0 A Winnacunnet (19- 1, 95.7) 3-17 -4.17 23.76 0.16 0.94 -3.76
0 A Timberlane (10- 6, 89.7) 9-16 -10.15 17.77 0.16 0.94 -9.39
0 H Merrimack Vall (12- 5, 90.1) 7- 9 -9.84 18.09 -0.16 0.94 -9.38
0 A Manchester Mem ( 1-15, 76.5) 13- 7 -23.43 4.50 0.16 0.94 4.37
0 H Kennett ( 5- 9, 83.9) 13- 9 -16.04 11.89 -0.16 0.94 11.02
0 A Kingswood ( 6-10, 83.8) 13-10 -16.12 11.81 0.16 0.94 11.23
0 H Bedford ( 9- 6, 93.2) 8-12 -6.68 21.25 -0.16 0.94 -6.42
------
-38.53
|
winning pts = 43.7247 losing points = -82.2578
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------