Fort Mill
W-L: ( 8- 2) PR = 89.1390Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 306 H Chapin (10- 7, 88.6) 9-15 324 A Catawba Ridge ( 9- 6, 85.6) 14-12 327 H Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 16-10 403 H Catawba Ridge ( 9- 6, 85.6) 8- 7 410 A Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 14- 3 414 A Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 18- 6 416 H Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 16- 4 425 H Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 13- 9 428 A TL Hanna (16- 1, 88.6) 18- 8 503 N Lucy Beckham (13- 1, 92.5) 5- 8
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
306 H Chapin 9-15 -6 1 --- -6.15
324 A Catawba Ridge 14-12 2 3 -0.93
327 H Clover 16-10 6 4 1.34
403 H Catawba Ridge 8- 7 1 4 - -3.17
410 A Nation Ford 14- 3 11 7 0.00
414 A Clover 18- 6 12 2 + 2.58
416 H Nation Ford 16- 4 12 8 0.00
425 H Riverside 13- 9 4 3 0.97
428 A TL Hanna 18- 8 10 0 ++ 5.09
503 N Lucy Beckham 5- 8 -3 -3 0.38
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 306 H Chapin 9-15 -6 1 --- -6.15 403 H Catawba Ridge 8- 7 1 4 - -3.17 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 428 A TL Hanna 18- 8 10 0 ++ 5.09 414 A Clover 18- 6 12 2 + 2.58 |
Fort Mill Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| Academic Magnet | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Aiken | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Ashley Hall | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Beaufort | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Bishop England | Bishop England | insuffient: ( 0- 1)( 1- 0) | Bishop England | |
| Bluffton | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Blythewood | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Boiling Springs | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Byrnes | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | Fort Mill | |
| Carolina Forest | Fort Mill | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| Catawba Ridge | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Chapin | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Christ Church Episcopal | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| Clover | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Dorman | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Dutch Fork | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Eastside | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 5- 0 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Fountain Inn | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| Greenville | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 3- 0 vs 1- 2 | ||
| Heathwood Hall | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| Hillcrest | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| Hilton Head | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Irmo | Fort Mill | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| James Island | Fort Mill | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | tied - ( 2- 1) ( 2- 1) | JL Mann Academy | |
| Legion Collegiate Academ | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Lexington | Lexington | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Lexington | |
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | ||
| Mauldin | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| May River | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Mid-Carolina | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Myrtle Beach | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Fort Mill | |
| Nation Ford | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| North Myrtle Beach | Fort Mill | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Philip Simmons | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Pinewood Prep | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | ||
| Ridge View | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| River Bluff | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Riverside | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Socastee | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Fort Mill | |
| Spartanburg | Spartanburg | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 3- 0) | Spartanburg | |
| Spring Valley | Fort Mill | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| St James | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| St Josephs Catholic | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| TL Hanna | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Trinity Collegiate | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Waccamaw | Fort Mill | Fort Mill | ||
| Wade Hampton | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Wando | Wando | insuffient: ( 0- 2)( 1- 1) | Wando | |
| West Ashley | Fort Mill | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| Westside | Fort Mill | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Fort Mill | |
| White Knoll | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Woodmont | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 2- 0 vs 0- 2 |
PowerWise = 47
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.58
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Chapin (10- 7, 88.6) 9-15 -11.29 22.38 -0.62 1.36 -16.17
0 A Catawba Ridge ( 9- 6, 85.6) 14-12 -14.31 19.36 0.62 1.36 27.13
0 H Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 16-10 -13.80 19.86 -0.62 1.36 26.13
0 H Catawba Ridge ( 9- 6, 85.6) 8- 7 -14.31 19.36 -0.62 1.36 25.45
0 A Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 14- 3 -18.44 15.22 0.62 1.36 21.51
0 A Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 18- 6 -13.80 19.86 0.62 1.36 27.82
0 H Nation Ford ( 2- 9, 81.5) 16- 4 -18.44 15.22 -0.62 1.36 19.83
0 H Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 13- 9 -13.17 20.50 -0.62 1.36 26.99
0 A TL Hanna (16- 1, 88.6) 18- 8 -11.30 22.37 0.62 1.36 31.22
0 N Lucy Beckham (13- 1, 92.5) 5- 8 -7.38 26.29 -0.00 1.36 -10.02
------
179.88
|
winning pts = 206.0817 losing points = -26.1981
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------