Dutch Fork
W-L: ( 7- 8) PR = 83.4102Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 224 A Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 10-14 227 A Oceanside Collegiate (11- 0, 99.9) 3-17 301 H Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 13- 6 303 H River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 4- 5 305 H AC Flora ( 9- 7, 82.2) 9- 8 306 H Lexington (15- 1, 95.7) 4-15 317 A Irmo ( 0-16, 66.8) 23- 2 320 A White Knoll ( 2-11, 73.3) 18- 3 321 A Byrnes (10- 7, 85.2) 9-16 324 A Spring Valley ( 7- 8, 71.7) 24- 1 326 H Aiken ( 5- 7, 79.5) 17- 7 403 H Chapin (10- 7, 88.6) 9-10 408 A Blythewood ( 4-10, 79.2) 13-10 411 A Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 8-18 423 A Wando ( 9- 6, 90.5) 4-20
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
224 A Clover 10-14 -4 -3 -0.69
227 A Oceanside Collegiate 3-17 -14 -17 0.00
301 H Eastside 13- 6 7 3 1.81
303 H River Bluff 4- 5 -1 -1 -0.07
305 H AC Flora 9- 8 1 2 -0.83
306 H Lexington 4-15 -11 -12 0.00
317 A Irmo 23- 2 21 16 0.00
320 A White Knoll 18- 3 15 9 0.00
321 A Byrnes 9-16 -7 -2 - -2.58
324 A Spring Valley 24- 1 23 11 0.00
326 H Aiken 17- 7 10 4 0.52
403 H Chapin 9-10 -1 -5 + 3.58
408 A Blythewood 13-10 3 4 -0.59
411 A Riverside 8-18 -10 -4 -1.06
423 A Wando 4-20 -16 -8 0.00
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 321 A Byrnes 9-16 -7 -2 - -2.58 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 403 H Chapin 9-10 -1 -5 + 3.58 |
Dutch Fork Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AC Flora | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Academic Magnet | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Dutch Fork | |
| Aiken | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Ashley Hall | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Beaufort | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Bishop England | Bishop England | Bishop England 3- 2 vs 0- 5 | ||
| Bluffton | Dutch Fork | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Dutch Fork | |
| Blythewood | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Boiling Springs | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) | Dutch Fork | |
| Byrnes | Byrnes | Byrnes | ||
| Carolina Forest | Carolina Forest | insuffient: ( 1- 3)( 2- 2) | Carolina Forest | |
| Catawba Ridge | Catawba Ridge | insuffient: ( 4- 3)( 5- 2) | Catawba Ridge | |
| Chapin | Chapin | Chapin | ||
| Christ Church Episcopal | Christ Church Episcopal | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 1) | Christ Church Episcopal | |
| Clover | Clover | Clover | ||
| Dorman | Dutch Fork | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | Dutch Fork | |
| Eastside | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Fort Mill | Fort Mill | Fort Mill 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Fountain Inn | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | Dutch Fork | |
| Greenville | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Dutch Fork | |
| Heathwood Hall | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) | Dutch Fork | |
| Hillcrest | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Hilton Head | Hilton Head | Hilton Head | ||
| Irmo | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| James Island | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Dutch Fork | |
| JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy | JL Mann Academy 3- 1 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Legion Collegiate Academ | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Lexington | Lexington | Lexington | ||
| Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham | Lucy Beckham 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Mauldin | Dutch Fork | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Dutch Fork | |
| May River | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Mid-Carolina | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork 4- 0 vs 2- 2 | ||
| Myrtle Beach | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Nation Ford | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork 3- 2 vs 1- 4 | ||
| North Myrtle Beach | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | Oceanside Collegiate | ||
| Philip Simmons | Philip Simmons | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Philip Simmons | |
| Pinewood Prep | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | Dutch Fork | |
| Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | Porter-Gaud School | ||
| Ridge View | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| River Bluff | River Bluff | River Bluff | ||
| Riverside | Riverside | Riverside | ||
| Socastee | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Dutch Fork | |
| Spartanburg | Spartanburg | Spartanburg 7- 1 vs 1- 7 | ||
| Spring Valley | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| St James | St James | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | St James | |
| St Josephs Catholic | Dutch Fork | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Dutch Fork | |
| TL Hanna | TL Hanna | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | TL Hanna | |
| Trinity Collegiate | Dutch Fork | insuffient: ( 2- 0)( 1- 1) | Dutch Fork | |
| Waccamaw | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Dutch Fork | |
| Wade Hampton | Wade Hampton | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Wade Hampton | |
| Wando | Wando | Wando | ||
| West Ashley | Dutch Fork | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | Dutch Fork | |
| Westside | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| White Knoll | Dutch Fork | Dutch Fork | ||
| Woodmont | Dutch Fork | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | Dutch Fork |
PowerWise = 34
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.58
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 A Clover ( 8- 7, 86.1) 10-14 -13.80 19.86 0.62 0.91 -11.94
0 A Oceanside Coll (11- 0, 99.9) 3-17 -0.00 33.67 0.62 0.91 -0.56
0 H Eastside ( 5-12, 80.8) 13- 6 -19.06 14.61 -0.62 0.91 12.67
0 H River Bluff (10- 7, 85.0) 4- 5 -14.94 18.73 -0.62 0.91 -14.08
0 H AC Flora ( 9- 7, 82.2) 9- 8 -17.70 15.97 -0.62 0.91 13.90
0 H Lexington (15- 1, 95.7) 4-15 -4.23 29.44 -0.62 0.91 -4.39
0 A Irmo ( 0-16, 66.8) 23- 2 -33.08 1.00 0.62 0.91 1.47
0 A White Knoll ( 2-11, 73.3) 18- 3 -26.57 7.09 0.62 0.91 6.98
0 A Byrnes (10- 7, 85.2) 9-16 -14.69 18.98 0.62 0.91 -12.74
0 A Spring Valley ( 7- 8, 71.7) 24- 1 -28.20 5.47 0.62 0.91 5.51
0 H Aiken ( 5- 7, 79.5) 17- 7 -20.35 13.31 -0.62 0.91 11.49
0 H Chapin (10- 7, 88.6) 9-10 -11.29 22.38 -0.62 0.91 -10.78
0 A Blythewood ( 4-10, 79.2) 13-10 -20.70 12.97 0.62 0.91 12.30
0 A Riverside ( 9- 6, 86.7) 8-18 -13.17 20.50 0.62 0.91 -11.36
0 A Wando ( 9- 6, 90.5) 4-20 -9.36 24.30 0.62 0.91 -7.92
------
-9.46
|
winning pts = 64.3128 losing points = -73.7755
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------