---    UPDATED: 07-28-25 23:01 PDT

safe3step girls Davis 1
  
Davis                 
W-L: (13- 7) PR = 88.5420

Schedule/Results All Games

Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 305 A Box Elder (11-10, 82.1) 16-13 306 A Skyridge (17- 4, 88.8) 15-12 311 H Bountiful ( 6-11, 78.7) 17- 4 313 H Riverton (15- 5, 89.3) 7-12 320 H Corner Canyon ( 6-13, 84.8) 15-11 326 A Brighton (13- 6, 88.9) 7-10 408 A Syracuse (12- 7, 86.1) 11- 5 410 H Fremont ( 9- 8, 86.5) 9- 5 415 H Layton ( 3-14, 77.4) 18- 1 417 A Weber ( 4-14, 80.7) 14- 8 419 A Salem Hills (19- 2, 88.7) 7-10 422 H Farmington (18- 3, 93.1) 5-16 424 H Syracuse (12- 7, 86.1) 12- 9 428 A Park City (18- 0, 99.9) 5-11 429 A Fremont ( 9- 8, 86.5) 8- 5 501 A Layton ( 3-14, 77.4) 18- 4 506 H Weber ( 4-14, 80.7) 17- 3 508 A Farmington (18- 3, 93.1) 7-11 515 H Fremont ( 9- 8, 86.5) 16-10 517 A Riverton (15- 5, 89.3) 9-10

PREDICTION LIST

               -------------------------------------
               |Real   = actual goal margin        |
               |Pred   = predicted goal margin     |
               |+      = slightly above prediction |
               |++     = above prediction          |
               |+++    = well above prediction     |
               |-      = slightly below prediction |
               |--     = below prediction          |
               |---    = well below prediction     |
               |Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-)  |
               |         prediction. N/A when ten  |
               |         goal limit is exceeded    |
               |n/a    = Outside division          |
               -------------------------------------


   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   305 A Box Elder              16-13       3     6    -     -2.00
   306 A Skyridge               15-12       3    -1    +      3.82
   311 H Bountiful              17- 4      13    10           0.00
   313 H Riverton                7-12      -5     0    --    -4.83
   320 H Corner Canyon          15-11       4     4          -0.33
   326 A Brighton                7-10      -3    -1    -     -2.12
   408 A Syracuse               11- 5       6     2    +      3.10
   410 H Fremont                 9- 5       4     3           1.42
   415 H Layton                 18- 1      17    12           0.00
   417 A Weber                  14- 8       6     7           0.00
   419 A Salem Hills             7-10      -3    -1    -     -2.34
   422 H Farmington              5-16     -11    -4          -1.03
   424 H Syracuse               12- 9       3     3          -0.00
   428 A Park City               5-11      -6   -12           0.00
   429 A Fremont                 8- 5       3     1           1.51
   501 A Layton                 18- 4      14    11           0.00
   506 H Weber                  17- 3      14     8           0.00
   508 A Farmington              7-11      -4    -5           1.00
   515 H Fremont                16-10       6     3    +      2.42
   517 A Riverton                9-10      -1    -1           0.27

UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   313 H Riverton                7-12      -5     0    --    -4.83
   305 A Box Elder              16-13       3     6    -     -2.00
   326 A Brighton                7-10      -3    -1    -     -2.12
   419 A Salem Hills             7-10      -3    -1    -     -2.34

OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES

   Date  Opponent               Score     Real Pred    +/-   Goals*
   306 A Skyridge               15-12       3    -1    +      3.82
   408 A Syracuse               11- 5       6     2    +      3.10
   515 H Fremont                16-10       6     3    +      2.42

Davis Evaluation

The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria: 
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
Opponent Who Gets
the Point?
Head-2-Head
Point
Common Opponent
Point
Power Rating
Point
Alta Davis Davis   3- 2 vs 1- 4
American Fork Davis insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) Davis
Bear River Davis tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Davis
Bingham Davis tied - ( 4- 4) ( 4- 4) Davis
Bonneville Davis Davis   6- 1 vs 0- 7
Bountiful Davis Davis  
Box Elder Davis Davis  
Brighton Brighton Brighton  
Canyon View Davis   Davis
Cedar Davis   Davis
Cedar Valley Davis tied - ( 2- 2) ( 2- 1) Davis
Clearfield Davis Davis   5- 0 vs 3- 2
Copper Hills Davis Davis   4- 2 vs 0- 6
Corner Canyon Davis Davis  
Crimson Cliffs Davis   Davis
Desert Hills Davis   Davis
East Davis insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Davis
Farmington Farmington Farmington  
Fremont Davis Davis  
Green Canyon Davis   Davis
Herriman Davis insuffient: ( 3- 1)( 2- 2) Davis
Highland Davis tied - ( 1- 3) ( 1- 3) Davis
Hillcrest Davis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Davis
Hurricane Davis   Davis
Jordan Davis   Davis
Juan Diego Catholic Davis   Davis
Judge Memorial Davis tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) Davis
Layton Davis Davis  
Lehi Davis Davis   3- 0 vs 1- 2
Logan Davis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Davis
Lone Peak Lone Peak insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 2- 3) Lone Peak
Maple Mountain Davis insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Davis
Mountain Crest Davis insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) Davis
Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge Mountain Ridge   7- 1 vs 4- 4
Mountain View Davis   Davis
Northridge Davis Davis   3- 0 vs 0- 3
Olympus Olympus Olympus   5- 1 vs 1- 5
Orem Davis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Davis
Park City Park City Park City  
Payson Davis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Davis
Pine View Davis   Davis
Pleasant Grove Davis tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) Davis
Provo Davis   Davis
Ridgeline Davis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Davis
Riverton Riverton Riverton  
Roy Davis Davis   5- 0 vs 0- 5
Salem Hills Salem Hills Salem Hills  
Sky View Davis   Davis
Skyline Davis tied - ( 0- 3) ( 0- 3) Davis
Skyridge Davis Davis  
Snow Canyon Davis   Davis
Spanish Fork Davis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Davis
Springville Davis insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) Davis
Syracuse Davis Davis  
Timpanogos Davis   Davis
Timpview Davis tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) Davis
Uintah Davis   Davis
Viewmont Davis tied - ( 4- 1) ( 4- 1) Davis
Wasatch Davis tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) Davis
Waterford Davis tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) Davis
Weber Davis Davis  
West Davis insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) Davis
West Field Davis   Davis
West Jordan Davis insuffient: ( 3- 3)( 2- 4) Davis
Westlake Davis Davis   2- 1 vs 0- 3
Woods Cross Davis tied - ( 3- 1) ( 3- 1) Davis

PowerWise = 58


division Games Only
Average number of games used in Games Correction = 17.79

 Date  Opponent          (W-L  PR)      SCORE       SAFE        SAFE       Home       No Games           SCI              
                                                    Loss        Win       Field      Correction         Points            
                                                    SLP         SWP     Advantage      Factor                       
                                                      
   0 A Box Elder       (11-10, 82.1)    16-13      -17.82      20.12       0.55         0.89            18.39
   0 A Skyridge        (17- 4, 88.8)    15-12      -11.09      26.86       0.55         0.89            24.38
   0 H Bountiful       ( 6-11, 78.7)    17- 4      -21.25      16.70      -0.55         0.89            14.37
   0 H Riverton        (15- 5, 89.3)     7-12      -10.63      27.31      -0.55         0.89            -9.95
   0 H Corner Canyon   ( 6-13, 84.8)    15-11      -15.14      22.81      -0.55         0.89            19.80
   0 A Brighton        (13- 6, 88.9)     7-10      -11.03      26.92       0.55         0.89            -9.32
   0 A Syracuse        (12- 7, 86.1)    11- 5      -13.81      24.14       0.55         0.89            21.96
   0 H Fremont         ( 9- 8, 86.5)     9- 5      -13.39      24.55      -0.55         0.89            21.35
   0 H Layton          ( 3-14, 77.4)    18- 1      -22.47      15.48      -0.55         0.89            13.28
   0 A Weber           ( 4-14, 80.7)    14- 8      -19.24      18.71       0.55         0.89            17.13
   0 A Salem Hills     (19- 2, 88.7)     7-10      -11.24      26.71       0.55         0.89            -9.51
   0 H Farmington      (18- 3, 93.1)     5-16       -6.84      31.11      -0.55         0.89            -6.57
   0 H Syracuse        (12- 7, 86.1)    12- 9      -13.81      24.14      -0.55         0.89            20.98
   0 A Park City       (18- 0, 99.9)     5-11       -0.00      37.95       0.55         0.89            -0.49
   0 A Fremont         ( 9- 8, 86.5)     8- 5      -13.39      24.55       0.55         0.89            22.33
   0 A Layton          ( 3-14, 77.4)    18- 4      -22.47      15.48       0.55         0.89            14.26
   0 H Weber           ( 4-14, 80.7)    17- 3      -19.24      18.71      -0.55         0.89            16.15
   0 A Farmington      (18- 3, 93.1)     7-11       -6.84      31.11       0.55         0.89            -5.60
   0 H Fremont         ( 9- 8, 86.5)    16-10      -13.39      24.55      -0.55         0.89            21.35
   0 A Riverton        (15- 5, 89.3)     9-10      -10.63      27.31       0.55         0.89            -8.97
                                                                                                        ------
                                                                                                       195.33

winning pts = 245.7358 losing points = -50.4102

             SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------